| Re: Canadiangunnutz postings |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.conspiracy · Group Profile
Author: klunkklunk Date: Jul 12, 2006 08:28
"Alex Cunningham" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:12b93a8am7icu11@corp.supernews.com...>>>"Alex Cunningham" wrote: ...
>>> Where's your documented proof that you claim to have, that the long gun
>>> registry is effective in
>>> solving crimes?
>
>>"klunk" theothershoe.org> wrote: ...
>> Where's your documented proof that you claim to have, that the long gun
>> registry is NOT effective in solving crimes?>
> That claim was never made by me whereas you most definitely made the claim
> you had documented evidence that the registry was used to solve many
> crimes.
> Where is it? Put up or shut up!
ok.... here's a previous post of yours:
12/04/2006
>>>>>>>Alex Cunningham wrote:
>>>>>>> The gun registry does not get abused.
>>>>>>> What gets abused here are the civil rights of legal gun owners
>>>>>>> because the authorities cannot stem the inflow and use of illegal
>>>>>>> guns by criminals. Criminals do not register their guns. There are
>>>>>>> absolutely no positive benefits in the registry, particularly in
>>>>>>> regards to the illegal possession of firearms.
i would say that the statement, "There are absolutely no positive benefits
in the registry" constitutes a statement that means it is NOT effective in
solving crimes... but, i'm open minded and could have misinterpreted your
meaning of "absolutely no positive benefit"... if i have, then please
clarify the distinction for me... it's a bit muddy right now.
| 
