|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: justme1952justme1952 Date: Jan 28, 2008 03:57
Just bump this post to the top of the list so we can all remind him
about his contributions to this board. 20+ posts in a day and a half,
not one of them concerning JFK. Two of these posts were a response to
someone that actually adressed him. The rest are just his incoherent
ramblings he adds when trying to defend Holmes or when he can't keep
his mouth shut and needs to feed his ego into to thinking anyone cares
what he says.
It gets rather boring listening to him accusing people of knowing
nothing about the case. The following posts by Healy show exactly what
he knows. Let me remind you, he thought Kennedys name was John FRANCIS
Kennedy...the rest speaks for itself.
|
| Show full article (7.23Kb) |
|
| | 48 Comments |
|
|
Author: aeffectsaeffects Date: Jan 28, 2008 08:01
On Jan 28, 3:57 am, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> Just bump this post to the top of the list so we can all remind him
> about his contributions to this board. 20+ posts in a day and a half,
> not one of them concerning JFK. Two of these posts were a response to
> someone that actually adressed him. The rest are just his incoherent
> ramblings he adds when trying to defend Holmes or when he can't keep
> his mouth shut and needs to feed his ego into to thinking anyone cares
> what he says.
>
> It gets rather boring listening to him accusing people of knowing
> nothing about the case. The following posts by Healy show exactly what
> he knows. Let me remind you, he thought Kennedys name was John FRANCIS
> Kennedy...the rest speaks for itself.
>
> Jan 27, 11:30 pm
> we need he/she/its insight concerning the JFK assassination and
> surrounding conspiracy.....
> After all, with Sammy daTuna's 2300 posts to this board (and
> counting) ...
|
| Show full article (7.97Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: justme1952justme1952 Date: Jan 28, 2008 08:39
On Jan 28, 11:01Â am, aeffects gmail.com> wrote:> On Jan 28, 3:57 am, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> Just bump this post to the top of the list so we can all remind him
>> about his contributions to this board. 20+ posts in a day and a half,
>> not one of them concerning JFK. Two of these posts were a response to
>> someone that actually adressed him. The rest are just his incoherent
>> ramblings he adds when trying to defend Holmes or when he can't keep
>> his mouth shut and needs to feed his ego into to thinking anyone cares
>> what he says.
>
>> It gets rather boring listening to him accusing people of knowing
>> nothing about the case. The following posts by Healy show exactly what
>> he knows. Let me remind you, he thought Kennedys name was John FRANCIS
>> Kennedy...the rest speaks for itself. ...
|
| Show full article (8.73Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tomnlntomnln Date: Jan 28, 2008 10:00
gmail.com> wrote in message
news:48d23e38-60fa-4f35-9b6c-dc77f5518295@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 28, 11:01 am, aeffects gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 3:57 am, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> Just bump this post to the top of the list so we can all remind him
>> about his contributions to this board. 20+ posts in a day and a half,
>> not one of them concerning JFK. Two of these posts were a response to
>> someone that actually adressed him. The rest are just his incoherent
>> ramblings he adds when trying to defend Holmes or when he can't keep
>> his mouth shut and needs to feed his ego into to thinking anyone cares
>> what he says.
>
>> It gets rather boring listening to him accusing people of knowing
>> nothing about the case. The following posts by Healy show exactly what ...
|
| Show full article (9.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Gil JesusGil Jesus Date: Jan 28, 2008 14:03
On Jan 28, 6:57�am, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:
> Just bump this post to the top of the list so we can all remind him
> about his contributions to this board. 20+ posts in a day and a half,
> not one of them concerning JFK.
Please post LINKS to ANY of your 2,208 posts in which you addressed
evidence, cited testimony, or posted something "concerning JFK".
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: justme1952justme1952 Date: Jan 28, 2008 14:10
On Jan 28, 5:03 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:> On Jan 28, 6:57�am, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Just bump this post to the top of the list so we can all remind him
>> about his contributions to this board. 20+ posts in a day and a half,
>> not one of them concerning JFK.
>
> Please post LINKS to ANY of your 2,208 posts in which you addressed
> evidence, cited testimony, or posted something "concerning JFK".
Go look for them yourself I'm not here to accomodate you.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: aeffectsaeffects Date: Jan 28, 2008 14:15
On Jan 28, 2:10 pm, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jan 28, 5:03 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 28, 6:57�am, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
>> wrote:>
>>> Just bump this post to the top of the list so we can all remind him
>>> about his contributions to this board. 20+ posts in a day and a half,
>>> not one of them concerning JFK.
>
>> Please post LINKS to ANY of your 2,208 posts in which you addressed
>> evidence, cited testimony, or posted something "concerning JFK".
>
> Go look for them yourself I'm not here to accomodate you.
none there toots-e-roll, so far as accomodating anyone here, keep BOTH
your hands on the keyboard
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Gil JesusGil Jesus Date: Jan 28, 2008 14:22
On Jan 28, 5:10�pm, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:
> Go look for them �yourself I'm not here to accomodate you.
You're not here to judge other people's posts but you have no problem
doing THAT.
You complain about a few off topic posts and yet you haven't posted
ONE on- topic post out of over 2200.
Then when asked prove that FACT wrong, you go off running.
You are a true loser.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: justme1952justme1952 Date: Jan 28, 2008 14:28
On Jan 28, 5:22 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:> On Jan 28, 5:10�pm, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Go look for them �yourself I'm not here to accomodate you.
>
> You're not here to judge other people's posts but you have no problem
> doing THAT.
>
> You complain about a few off topic posts and yet you haven't posted
> ONE on- topic post out of over 2200.
>
> Then when asked prove that FACT wrong, you go off running.
>
> You are a true loser.
and you're a liar...ask your buddy Walt if I've posted anything or
look at the threads hes been posting in.
Now go play with yourself, its what you do best
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: aeffectsaeffects Date: Jan 28, 2008 14:31
On Jan 28, 2:28 pm, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jan 28, 5:22 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 28, 5:10�pm, "justme1...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
>> wrote:>
>>> Go look for them �yourself I'm not here to accomodate you.
>
>> You're not here to judge other people's posts but you have no problem
>> doing THAT.
>
>> You complain about a few off topic posts and yet you haven't posted
>> ONE on- topic post out of over 2200.
>
>> Then when asked prove that FACT wrong, you go off running.
>
>> You are a true loser.
>
> and you're a liar...ask your buddy Walt if I've posted anything or ...
|
| Show full article (0.81Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
