> On 11 May, 12:20, aeffects gmail.com> wrote:
>

>>http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=12745&pid=14491...

>
> Dave, I would like to have refuted Alaric Rosman's contention that
> Helen Markham could have seen just what she claimed to have seen, but
> I'm not a member of that forum so I can't reply.
>
> Here's what Rosman wrote: .......
>
> (3) Her statement was to the point, unambiguous, and she claimed to
> have witnessed nothing that she could not have reasonably been
> expected to have seen. Her vantage point would have given her an
> unobstructed view, situated only about 150 ft (8) from the incident.
>
> Rosman fails to take into consideration that Tippits car was between
> Markham and the gunman so she could NOT have seen EXACTLY how the
> killer rested his upper body weight against the sde of Tippits car.
> She SURMISED that the passenger side window was down and the killer
> leaned his arms on the car. She had to ASSUME that, because she could
> NOT have seen either the window or the killer's hands and arms as he
> leaned forward to talk to Tippit. Since photos taken shortly after
> the shooting show that the window was closed but the VENT window was
> open it's a fair assumption that this is the positions of the windows
> when the killer talked to Tippit.
>
> I'm pretty much in agreement with Rosman but he should be made aware
> that he needs to reexamine the point I've mentioned.