The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.conspiracy.jfk only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.conspiracy.jfk Profile…
 Up
The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: Ben Holmes
Date: May 12, 2008 07:00

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend
the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two
semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the
troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most
of the 'answers'.

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************
Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults
and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):
Show full article (2.69Kb)
11 Comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: Chuck Schuyler
Date: May 12, 2008 10:55

On May 12, 9:00 am, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:

{Edited for clarity}
> 28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation for the
> reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.
> Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL VIEWER?*

Because they are casual viewers.

You answered your own question, moron.

The Z film is tracking the limo...obviously that makes it tough to
observe a slight slowing of the limo.

The film record doesn't show a limo stop-like you seem to think
happened.

Next question?
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: aeffects
Date: May 12, 2008 11:32

On May 12, 10:55 am, Chuck Schuyler am-mtg.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 9:00 am, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:
>
> {Edited for clarity}
>
>> 28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation for the
>> reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.
>> Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL VIEWER?*
>
> Because they are casual viewers.
>
> You answered your own question, moron.
>
> The Z film is tracking the limo...obviously that makes it tough to
> observe a slight slowing of the limo.
>
> The film record doesn't show a limo stop-like you seem to think
> happened.
>
> Next question? ...
Show full article (0.83Kb)
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: justme1952
Date: May 12, 2008 11:38

On May 12, 2:32 pm, aeffects gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 10:55 am, Chuck Schuyler am-mtg.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On May 12, 9:00 am, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:
>
>> {Edited for clarity}
>
>>> 28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation for the
>>> reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.
>>> Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL VIEWER?*
>
>> Because they are casual viewers.
>
>> You answered your own question, moron.
>
>> The Z film is tracking the limo...obviously that makes it tough to ...
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: Ben Holmes
Date: May 12, 2008 12:37

In article <1c0ebbab-5bda-4f8b-9459-c201f96eaed5@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>
>On May 12, 10:55 am, Chuck Schuyler am-mtg.com> wrote:
>> On May 12, 9:00 am, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:
>>
>> {Edited for clarity}
>>
>>> 28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation
>>> for the reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.
>>> Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL VIEWER?*
>>
>> Because they are casual viewers.

So too are those in Dealey Plaza. They only saw the event once... the extant
Z-film can be viewed over and over - and yet it *STILL* can't be seen.

Only by analyzing the film frame by frame can you spot a "slowdown"
Show full article (3.75Kb)
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: Chuck Schuyler
Date: May 12, 2008 13:13

On May 12, 2:37 pm, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:

Ben,

No one except the most whacked-out, wigged-out freaks think the Z film
was 'altered'. It's insane. If the conspirators wanted to, the Z film
could've been "lost" or held many, many decades under some national
security claim or Kennedy family concern.

CT'ers constantly turn everything they touch in this case into a
clusterf*ck of over-complicated double-think.

Other cameras were in Dealey Plaza that afternoon. Some filmed the
event. The conspirators had no way of knowing, in the months following
the assassination, what films or photos would pop up.

If you want to associate yourself with these deeply paranoid kooks-
like Healy, fine.

I'll stand with the good men and women who worked hard to honor JFK by
getting the details about his death correct.

Use your head as something other than a target for a stinky foot at
the judo club.
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: aeffects
Date: May 12, 2008 14:34

On May 12, 1:13 pm, Chuck Schuyler am-mtg.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 2:37 pm, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> No one except the most whacked-out, wigged-out freaks think the Z film
> was 'altered'. It's insane. If the conspirators wanted to, the Z film
> could've been "lost" or held many, many decades under some national
> security claim or Kennedy family concern.
>
> CT'ers constantly turn everything they touch in this case into a
> clusterf*ck of over-complicated double-think.
>
> Other cameras were in Dealey Plaza that afternoon. Some filmed the
> event. The conspirators had no way of knowing, in the months following
> the assassination, what films or photos would pop up.
>
> If you want to associate yourself with these deeply paranoid kooks-
> like Healy, fine.
> ...
Show full article (1.12Kb)
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: timstter
Date: May 12, 2008 15:46

TOP POST

It's interesting, Ben, that you are positing another indicator of Z
film alteration.

Yet the last one you posited, *Yellow Pants/Z 369* was shown to be in
error by several posters, a fact you still won't acknowledge.

Given that, why should anyone believe what you're asserting now about
the Z film? Or even bother to respond to you, for that matter, LOL!

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

On May 13, 5:37 am, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:
> In article <1c0ebbab-5bda-4f8b-9459-c201f96ea...@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> aeffects says...
>
>
>
>>On May 12, 10:55 am, Chuck Schuyler...
Show full article (4.38Kb)
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: David Von Pein
Date: May 12, 2008 16:02

ANSWERING 21 QUESTIONS ASKED BY A CONSPIRACY-HAPPY KOOK [which is a
number that has now grown to the "Absurd 45" of Ben "Mega-Kook"
Holmes].......

=======================================================
>>> "(1) Why was the closest police eyewitness to the murder, who just coincidently would have testified in contradiction to the SBT, was never questioned by the FBI or WC prior to the release of the WCR?" <<<

DVP: It's rather remarkable, isn't it, that the author of the above
question somehow knows for a fact what Mr. Chaney's testimony would
have been, even though no testimony exists?

Many of the closest witnesses were questioned at length about the
shooting, including other motorcycle officers, plus John & Nellie
Connally, Jackie Kennedy, Kellerman, and Greer.

The CTer who wrote this question seems to think that the Warren
Commission KNEW for a fact that Officer Chaney was going to say
something the WC desperately didn't want to have in the record of the
WR. Any chance of providing any proof that the WC didn't call Chaney
specifically because Chaney was going to say something that was
"conspiracy" oriented?
Show full article (26.67Kb)
no comments
Re: The 45 Questions That Frighten LNT'ers - One by One (#28)         


Author: Ben Holmes
Date: May 12, 2008 20:32

In article q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...
>
>On May 12, 1:13 pm, Chuck Schuyler am-mtg.com> wrote:
>> On May 12, 2:37 pm, Ben Holmes khadaji.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ben,

Hmmm... first, let's put back in what you can't answer, eh?

28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation for the
reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.

With dozens of eyewitnesses all reporting the slowdown/stop - and many of them
*highly* credible (such as the motorcycle cops who were *with* the limo),
LNT'ers really can't deny what happened.

So when it's pointed out that this *IS NOT SEEN* in the extant Z-Film - they all
immediately jump into a chorus of "Hallelujah Alvarez"... pointing out that
Alvarez found a slowdown in the film.

BUT IT CAN'T BE SEEN BY THE CASUAL VIEWER!!!
Show full article (3.01Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Er der stadig nogen der bruger EPROM'er?dk.marked.privat.elektronikloesdele+maalegrej ·
 
1 2