Re: Misc. Battles With CT-Kooks
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.conspiracy.jfk only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Misc. Battles With CT-Kooks         

Group: alt.conspiracy.jfk · Group Profile
Author: David Von Pein
Date: Sep 8, 2007 05:59

>>> "You're reaching. Badly." {Re. Oswald having possibly switched from the scope to the rifle's iron sights after the first shot.} <<<

You're just plain kooky to say this. Several other people who have
looked into the case think the same thing re. LHO possibly using both
the scope and the iron sights during the assassination.
>>> "If Oswald BORE shot the president using the IRON sight, great balls of fire, the target would be 4 TIMES farther away and make the shot from "behind" even more difficult than it already was." <<<

Which wasn't difficult at all, of course....especially for a person
trained to shoot in the Marines. 88 yards maximum at Shot #3, shooting
at a virtually-stationary target moving away from him at 11 MPH. Duh!
>>> "...FOUR times farther away! This distance also goes for the supposed head shot to Kennedy that Oswald pulled off with his Hail Mary blast from the rear. He did this ALL with the IRON sight?" <<<

I don't know it for a fact, no. I surmised he possibly used the
sights. Nobody can know for sure. Duh!

And, unfortunately, the murderer wasn't kind enough to tell Will Fritz
(or anyone else) whether he cut down JFK by looking through the
telescope or by using the sights. That was damned unpolite of him not
to give that information, wasn't it Mr. Bullsh!tHouse?
>>> "Not to mention that Oswald would have had to RE-AIM on the last two IRON sight shots because of the rifle's RECOIL and without using the scope and, again, at four times the distance." <<<

Yeah, he wouldn't have had ANY recoil if he'd used the scope for all 3
shots, and he wouldn't have had to "re-aim" at all, right?

Kooky.
>>> "And one would suppose that if Oswald truly had any serious premeditated intentions of murdering the president..." <<<

Which he didn't. That fact is quite obvious via his last-minute
preparation efforts (Thursday night visit to Irving) and his half-
assed to non-existent escape plan (walking, bus, taxi, then walking
some more).
>>> "...We are being asked to believe that Oswald went up to the bloody 6th floor of the School Depository in a smoldering 'killing' mood because he 'hated' Kennedy so much..." <<<

He didn't hate Kennedy...and nobody I know of has ever made such a
claim. Learn the case...and learn about Oswald.

As Vince Bugliosi rightly said re. Oswald's possible motive:

"When Oswald was aiming at JFK, he was very likely aiming at the
United States of America, which he definitely hated." (Paraphrased VB
comments.)
>>> "...and yet he {Saint Oswald The Great} brings a cheap mail-order Italian rifle and a scope so misaligned that it couldn't shoot a chicken out of a chicken pot, and in the heat of the act itself, Oswald is successful in BORE shooting the president. I've heard it all now. Such an argument elicits more pity than anger that anyone could propose such a thing. .... All anyone has to do to determine that Oswald shot no one in Dallas is to read some of these completely sad-sack arguments and then turn them around 180 degrees to clearly know what happened." <<<

Now it's official
-- You're a Mega-Kook. Congrats. (The unbelievably-
stupid comment "Oswald shot no one" is what sent you over the top.)

It usually takes a conspiracy-loving nutcase longer to gain official
"Mega-Kook" status. You've achieved it in record time. Nice job indeed.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!