|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: A402336A402336 Date: Jul 24, 2008 19:57
Many lone nuts are simply, REALLY, thick.
Thick as a brick.
JFK's head exploded at Z-313.
The GK picket fence corner is first seen in the Zap film around 450.
Z-450 is 7.5 seconds after 313.
Hey lone nuts, (a.k.a. LooNs) are you REALLY so densely thick as to
think a presidential assassin will just hang around and remain in the
exact same GK picket fence location for the first critical 7 to 8
seconds after he just fired a shot?
Hardly, LooN.
What a complete maroon you simplemindedly are, if you regurgitate that
back into only yourself!
The hatted headtop of the north GK assassin is seen in the Moorman #5
polaroid in a location of 16' west of the GK picket fence corner.
(sorry Mr. Marsh, break out your scale again after, first, getting the
correct sightline from Moorman's lense; the assassin was substantially
further than 9' west of the picket fence corner)
That same GK fenceline assassin has moved out in all films and photos
captured mere seconds after 313.
|
| Show full article (4.21Kb) |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: A402336A402336 Date: Jul 24, 2008 20:27
BTW, the Moorman # 5, GK picket fence, hatted assassin, while he did
fire, he completely missed hitting JFK in the head.
Around Z-313 with JFK many feet lower, and much more importantly,
around 313 with JFK facing a nearly perfect 90 degrees completely away
from that GK picket fence assassin, any and every supersonic bullet
hitting anywhere into his right half would have, with 99.99 %%
probability, definitely caused damage onto the left, bullet-exiting,
half of JFK's head.
There was 0 %% damage on the left half of JFK's head.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Gil JesusGil Jesus Date: Jul 24, 2008 21:41
On Jul 24, 2:27�pm, A402336 aol.com> wrote:
>
> There was 0 %% damage on the left half of JFK's head.
Which would tend to prove that the fatal head shot was not fired from
the right side, or from behind.
When the HSCA did their wounds/ballistics testing of the Western
Cartridge ammunition, the only kind which could have been fired from
Oswald's rifle, they found that in nearly every instance, that a
bullet fired from behind left a large exit wound in the front of the
skull.
But the "autopsy" photos show no such exit wound in the front. Neither
do they show any such exit wound on the left side of the skull.
The eyewitnesses who saw the large exit wound described it as being in
the REAR of the skull, in the occipital/parietal area, on the RIGHT
side.
Which means that the bullet that caused THAT wound was fired from in
front of Kennedy and to his LEFT, on Jackie's side of the car.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SpenceSpence Date: Jul 24, 2008 23:50
On Jul 24, 3:41 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:> On Jul 24, 2:27�pm, A402336 aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> There was 0 %% damage on the left half of JFK's head.
>
> Which would tend to prove that the fatal head shot was not fired from
> the right side, or from behind.
>
> When the HSCA did their wounds/ballistics testing of the Western
> Cartridge ammunition, the only kind which could have been fired from
> Oswald's rifle, they found that in nearly every instance, that a
> bullet fired from behind left a large exit wound in the front of the
> skull.
>
> But the "autopsy" photos show no such exit wound in the front. Neither
> do they show any such exit wound on the left side of the skull.
>
> The eyewitnesses who saw the large exit wound described it as being in ...
|
| Show full article (1.19Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tomnlntomnln Date: Jul 25, 2008 00:47
"Spence" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c0857411-4be0-4899-8146-800c284c89e8@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 24, 3:41 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:> On Jul 24, 2:27�pm, A402336 aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> There was 0 %% damage on the left half of JFK's head.
>
> Which would tend to prove that the fatal head shot was not fired from
> the right side, or from behind.
>
> When the HSCA did their wounds/ballistics testing of the Western
> Cartridge ammunition, the only kind which could have been fired from
> Oswald's rifle, they found that in nearly every instance, that a
> bullet fired from behind left a large exit wound in the front of the
> skull.
>
> But the "autopsy" photos show no such exit wound in the front. Neither
> do they show any such exit wound on the left side of the skull. ...
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mucher1mucher1 Date: Jul 25, 2008 01:26
On 24 Jul., 21:41, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:> On Jul 24, 2:27�pm, A402336 aol.com> wrote:
>>> There was 0 %% damage on the left half of JFK's head.
>
> Which would tend to prove that the fatal head shot was not fired from
> the right side, or from behind.
>
> When the HSCA did their wounds/ballistics testing of the Western
> Cartridge ammunition, the only kind which could have been fired from
> Oswald's rifle, they found that in nearly every instance, that a
> bullet fired from behind left a large exit wound in the front of the
> skull.
The HSCA conducted their own ballistics tests? Using skulls???
Please explain, Gil.
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: A402336A402336 Date: Jul 25, 2008 07:45
On Jul 24, 3:41 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:> On Jul 24, 2:27�pm, A402336 aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> There was 0 %% damage on the left half of JFK's head.
>
> Which would tend to prove that the fatal head shot was not fired from
> the right side, or from behind.
>
> When the HSCA did their wounds/ballistics testing of the Western
> Cartridge ammunition, the only kind which could have been fired from
> Oswald's rifle, they found that in nearly every instance, that a
> bullet fired from behind left a large exit wound in the front of the
> skull.
>
> But the "autopsy" photos show no such exit wound in the front. Neither
> do they show any such exit wound on the left side of the skull.
>
> The eyewitnesses who saw the large exit wound described it as being in ...
|
| Show full article (4.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
