|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: Robert HarrisRobert Harris Date: Aug 21, 2008 04:30
Dear Mr. Myers,
I think your decision to censor my criticism of one of your videos, by
telling Youtube that this was a copyright violation, was a bad choice.
Since you allow your fellow conspiracy deniers to post your presentation
on Youtube in it's entirety, while censoring my usage of a small
portion, you make it obvious, that the problem is not about the
copyright. It's about you trying to censor criticism and being caught
deliberately misrepresenting one of the most important events of the
20th century.
You had every opportunity to respond to my video and defend your work,
and with much better resources than I have. But you can't do that, can
you Mr. Myers? There is no presentation you can create using those phony
frames which would convince anyone who has become aware of your tactics.
Your attempt at heavy-handed censorship is both cowardly and dishonest.
You proved to everyone that you are incapable of defending the theory
you've been pitching all these years, and you demonstrate exactly what
kind of integrity you possess, by censoring my video on totally false
pretenses.
|
| Show full article (1.25Kb) |
|
| | 29 Comments |
|
|
Author: Chuck SchuylerChuck Schuyler Date: Aug 21, 2008 04:35
On Aug 20, 9:30 pm, Robert Harris yahoo.com> wrote:> Dear Mr. Myers,
>
> I think your decision to censor my criticism of one of your videos, by
> telling Youtube that this was a copyright violation, was a bad choice.
>
> Since you allow your fellow conspiracy deniers to post your presentation
> on Youtube in it's entirety, while censoring my usage of a small
> portion, you make it obvious, that the problem is not about the
> copyright. It's about you trying to censor criticism and being caught
> deliberately misrepresenting one of the most important events of the
> 20th century.
>
> You had every opportunity to respond to my video and defend your work,
> and with much better resources than I have. But you can't do that, can
> you Mr. Myers? There is no presentation you can create using those phony
> frames which would convince anyone who has become aware of your tactics.
>
> Your attempt at heavy-handed censorship is both cowardly and dishonest.
> You proved to everyone that you are incapable of defending the theory ...
|
| Show full article (1.34Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein Date: Aug 21, 2008 05:35
>>> "In short, Mr. Myers, you have confirmed that you are exactly what I have been claiming you were, all along." <<<
And what would that be, Bob?
Could it be that Dale Myers is a person who worked for ten years on a
detailed, painstaking 3D animation project, and proved beyond all
reasonable doubt (to reasonable people) via that detailed computer
animation project that the Single-Bullet Theory is a fact, who doesn't
feel like having his hard work soiled and dragged through the YouTube
mud by the likes of Robert Harris by having Harris distort and
misrepresent and mangle the specifics of Mr. Myers' animation work in
a homemade video....a video that was produced by a person who doesn't
have the slightest idea what he's talking about when it comes to the
specifics of 3D computer animation and photogrammetry?
Could that be the type of person Dale K. Myers is?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BudBud Date: Aug 21, 2008 08:15
Robert Harris wrote:
> Dear Mr. Myers,
>
> I think your decision to censor my criticism of one of your videos, by
> telling Youtube that this was a copyright violation, was a bad choice.
Lets hope he sues you, so you can clear your good name in court.
> Since you allow your fellow conspiracy deniers to post your presentation
> on Youtube in it's entirety, while censoring my usage of a small
> portion, you make it obvious, that the problem is not about the
> copyright.
Since the US arms the Iraqi army, you think it`s only fair we
should arm the insurgents also?
> It's about you trying to censor criticism and being caught
> deliberately misrepresenting one of the most important events of the
> 20th century.
Whether Kennedy was killed by a lone gunman or a conspiracy is
unimportant. Both possibilities bring us to the same present reality.
> You had every opportunity to respond to my video and defend your work,
|
| Show full article (2.19Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein Date: Aug 23, 2008 05:52
>>> "Copyright violation? It's called FAIR USE. Quoting someone's own work to criticize it." <<<
Robert Harris wasn't merely "quoting" Dale Myers' work. Mr. Harris was
using the actual imagery of Myers' "Secrets Of A Homicide" animation
project that was aired in 2004 on The Discovery Channel. And Harris
did so without permission of the copyright owner (Myers), of course.
So Dale certainly has every right to file a complaint with YouTube.
I wouldn't want my work being mangled and misrepresented by a person
who is bent on a JFK conspiracy and then have that CTer prop up this
blatant misrepresentation about my work on a popular public website
for the gullible masses to swallow. I, too, would be upset about that
kind of thing.
A word of advice -- Don't mess around with Dale Myers' copyrighted
material in order to spread the kind of misrepresentations about his
work that Bob Harris has recently done....because Dale WILL take
notice of it. He's very protective of his work....as he has every
right to be. I can't blame him for that one little bit.
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: aeffectsaeffects Date: Aug 23, 2008 09:29
On Aug 22, 8:52 pm, David Von Pein aol.com> wrote:>>>> "Copyright violation? It's called FAIR USE. Quoting someone's own work to criticize it." <<<
>
> Robert Harris wasn't merely "quoting" Dale Myers' work. Mr. Harris was
> using the actual imagery of Myers' "Secrets Of A Homicide" animation
> project that was aired in 2004 on The Discovery Channel. And Harris
> did so without permission of the copyright owner (Myers), of course.
> So Dale certainly has every right to file a complaint with YouTube.
>
> I wouldn't want my work being mangled and misrepresented by a person
> who is bent on a JFK conspiracy and then have that CTer prop up this
> blatant misrepresentation about my work on a popular public website
> for the gullible masses to swallow. I, too, would be upset about that
> kind of thing.
>
> A word of advice -- Don't mess around with Dale Myers' copyrighted
> material in order to spread the kind of misrepresentations about his
> work that Bob Harris has recently done....because Dale WILL take
> notice of it. He's very protective of his work....as he has every
> right to be. I can't blame him for that one little bit. ...
|
| Show full article (1.59Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Herbert BlennerHerbert Blenner Date: Aug 23, 2008 12:00
On Aug 22, 11:52 pm, David Von Pein aol.com> wrote:>>>> "Copyright violation? It's called FAIR USE. Quoting someone's own work to criticize it." <<<
>
> Robert Harris wasn't merely "quoting" Dale Myers' work. Mr. Harris was
> using the actual imagery of Myers' "Secrets Of A Homicide" animation
> project that was aired in 2004 on The Discovery Channel. And Harris
> did so without permission of the copyright owner (Myers), of course.
> So Dale certainly has every right to file a complaint with YouTube.
>
> I wouldn't want my work being mangled and misrepresented by a person
> who is bent on a JFK conspiracy and then have that CTer prop up this
> blatant misrepresentation about my work on a popular public website
> for the gullible masses to swallow. I, too, would be upset about that
> kind of thing.
>
> A word of advice -- Don't mess around with Dale Myers' copyrighted
> material in order to spread the kind of misrepresentations about his
> work that Bob Harris has recently done....because Dale WILL take
> notice of it. He's very protective of his work....as he has every
> right to be. I can't blame him for that one little bit. ...
|
| Show full article (2.52Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein Date: Aug 23, 2008 13:39
>>> "Unfortunately they omit labels for the dependent axes. However, the plotted curves would now agree with the text if we assume that the omitted labels are distances. Now the unchanging slope of the linear curve represents a constant speed. For the spline curve the initial slope of zero represents an object as rest. The increasing slope corresponds to an increasing speed and followed by a decreasing slope of the slowing object. Finally the zero slope at the final point shows an [sic] object at rest. In summary the plots have two outstanding errors. First the dependent axes need labels and the titles of the graphics must be changed from "velocity curves" to distance curves." <<<
What a load.
Is all of that sophisticated mumbo-jumbo supposed to somehow prove
that Dale Myers is full of shit?
To repeat.....
What a load [of crappola].
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein Date: Aug 23, 2008 13:46
>>> "Unfortunately they omit labels for the dependent axes. However, the plotted curves would now agree with the text if we assume that the omitted labels are distances. Now the unchanging slope of the linear curve represents a constant speed. For the spline curve the initial slope of zero represents an object as rest. The increasing slope corresponds to an increasing speed and followed by a decreasing slope of the slowing object. Finally the zero slope at the final point shows an object at rest. In summary the plots have two outstanding errors. First the dependent axes need labels and the titles of the graphics must be changed from "velocity curves" to distance curves." <<<
What a load.
Is all of that sophisticated mumbo-jumbo supposed to somehow prove
that Dale Myers is full of shit?
To repeat.....
What a load [of crappola].
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: mucher1mucher1 Date: Aug 23, 2008 18:23
On 23 Aug., 12:00, Herbert Blenner verizon.net> wrote:> On Aug 22, 11:52 pm, David Von Pein aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>>>>> "Copyright violation? It's called FAIR USE. Quoting someone's own work to criticize it." <<<
>
>> Robert Harris wasn't merely "quoting" Dale Myers' work. Mr. Harris was
>> using the actual imagery of Myers' "Secrets Of A Homicide" animation
>> project that was aired in 2004 on The Discovery Channel. And Harris
>> did so without permission of the copyright owner (Myers), of course.
>> So Dale certainly has every right to file a complaint with YouTube.
>
>> I wouldn't want my work being mangled and misrepresented by a person
>> who is bent on a JFK conspiracy and then have that CTer prop up this
>> blatant misrepresentation about my work on a popular public website
>> for the gullible masses to swallow. I, too, would be upset about that
>> kind of thing. ...
|
| Show full article (3.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
