TOP POST
Damn, Barb! Remind me never to try to put one over on you.
Dave
On Mar 6, 2:34�pm, Barb Junkkarinen
comcast.net> wrote:> Another character joins the parade!
>
> And this one ventured out in the cold to go to the library and post!
>
> NNTP/IP address for this post (check "see all header fields"} is:
>
> Path:
>
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!
nntp.giganews.com!
postnews.google.com!m3g2000�
hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: jfk2...@
gmail.com
> Newsgroups:
alt.conspiracy.jfk
> Subject: Re: aaj reject -- it's ok to follow the money with a witness,
> but not
> � � � � with a poster on aaj...
> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:05:32 -0800 (PST)
>
Organization:http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 376
> Message-ID:
> <18edd478-dac2-47e0-9b6d-f2cd040a3...@
m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
> References:
> <5a92feb6-07b7-459d-baa4-b60b33956...@
i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
> � � � �
4ax.com>
> h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
> � � � � 4ax.com>
> u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
>
> <500cc985-d2a6-4794-8866-d67c3c6cb...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
>
> p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
> � � � � 4ax.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.112.121.29
> � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> And what info is available about this particular IP?
>
> QUOTE
> This IP address, 65.112.121.29, is registered to Hennepin County
> Libraries and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page
> may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant.
> Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its
> contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this
> address, efforts will be made to contact Hennepin County Libraries to
> report abuse.
>
> END QUOTE
>
> See: �http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:65.112.121.29
>
> And WHO do we know who lives in this county, in this state???
>
> ONE GUESS!
>
> C'mon Pamela ... isn't this going a bit to the extreme? �It's 15
> freakin' degrees there today and you go out to a library to
> manufacture yet another identity ...pretty extreme way to drum up some
> support, don't ya think?
>
> Of course, it could just be a coincidence that someone else in this
> county in this state where you live chose to go to the library, create
> an identity, find this discussion and go after me. :-)
>
> But I think we all know the reality.
>
> Please, Pamela ... this is sad. Stop the garbage. Let's discuss the
> case.
>
> Barb :-)
>
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:05:32 -0800 (PST), jfk2...@gmail.com wrote:>>On Mar 6, 12:06�am, Barb Junkkarinen
comcast.net>
>>wrote:>>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 21:34:47 -0800 (PST), pamela...@
hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>On Mar 5, 3:29�pm, michelle
yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>>> On Mar 4, 5:49�pm, Barb Junkkarinen
comcast.net> wrote:>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:57:38 -0800 (PST), pamela...@
hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Mar 4, 3:01�am, Barb Junkkarinen
comcast.net> wrote:>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 23:55:19 -0800 (PST), pamela...@
hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>On Mar 3, 6:42�pm, michelle
yahoo.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>> michelle"
yahoo.com> wrote in message>
>>>>>>>>>>>news:f0a0a72e-18d9-44a1-988f-2309a832ee4f@
s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 29, 7:58 pm, Pamela McElwain-Brown
gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>
>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 1:38 pm, "Pamela McElwain-Brown"
mindspring.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I post to the Ed Forum all the time, the name is not familiar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's one of his posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LINK DELETED [K.H.]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This from the self annointed authority on "respect" after Blackburst
>>>>>>>>>>>>>requested that you not publish his personal information on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> internet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are a real bitch.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a schmuck.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, I did not use his name in the post,
>>>>>>>>>>>> nor did I copy the post. �I provided a link in response
>>>>>>>>>>>> to the poster's question. �Why do you object �to that?
>>>>>>>>>>>> The issue per BB does not appear to be the use of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> name on the internet �per se but on aaj and by inference
>>>>>>>>>>>> acj. �All screen names are supposed to be �protected
>>>>>>>>>>>> on aaj, and there is supposed to be no discussion regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>> them. �However, your friend Barb has gone out of her
>>>>>>>>>>>> way to post on aaj about �screen names, apparently with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the blessings of the censors and you. �What �pithy epithet
>>>>>>>>>>>> do you have for that?
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Quit dissembling. �Rules have nothing to do with this.
>>>>>>>>>>> Blackburst has not even been participating in this
>>>>>>>>>>> exchange which you so unwisely invited. �Blackburst
>>>>>>>>>>> made a basic request that you respect his wish that
>>>>>>>>>>> his personal information not be posted all over the
>>>>>>>>>>> internet.
>
>>>>>>>>>>That is begging the question that his name is already on the internet
>>>>>>>>>>because he posts at the Ed Forum under his actual name.
>
>>>>>>>>> No...use your head, Pamela.
>
>>>>>> Give up Barb. �Even you can't compartmentalize the net. �Your photo is
>>>>>> out there and information on where you live.
>
>>>>>>>>> First of all, the fact that Blackburst requests his real name not be
>>>>>>>>> used on usenet shoyld be enough for you. It's his name, he had some
>>>>>>>>> wacko show up at his house and scare his wife ... any particular
>>>>>>>>> reason you just can't respect that?
>
>>>>>>>>I have wierd Keven Heflin posting defamatory rants day and night and
>>>>>>>>who sleeps with a gun under his head putting my full name into posts
>>>>>>>>which with which he has spammed acj. �Do you not think I wonder what
>>>>>>>>else he is capable of doing? �Thanks to you and Keven I indeed have an
>>>>>>>>insight into BB's situation.
>
>>>>>>> You have chosen to post, as many do, including me, with your legal
>>>>>>> name. BB simply requested his legal name not be posted on usemet.
>
>>>>>> I am respecting that. �Why are you persisting in bringing attention to
>>>>>> him? �What is more important to you than his wishes?
>
>>>>>>> Doesn't seem like so much to ask to me. But you were hell bent on
>>>>>>> making an issue of it ...
>
>>>>>> I am replying to your posts Barb. �I am not initiating anything.
>
>>>>>> �just like you chose to start all those
>
>>>>>>> threads on both aajfk and here with ridiculing, defamatory titles.
>
>>>>>> Whatever you mean by that is beside the point.
>
>>>>>>> Don't try to make yourself out a victim, Pamela. It won't wash.
>
>>>>>> Everyone can decide that for themselves, Barb. �Besides, isn't this
>>>>>> post supposed to be about your great and overwhelming concern for BB's
>>>>>> privacy?
>>>>>> Why are you changing the subject?
>
>>>>>>>>How would you like to go to sleep at night wondering if someone was
>>>>>>>>mashugganeh enough to fly to Beaverton Oregon and show up at your
>>>>>>>>door?
>
>>>>>>> I don't live in Beaverton, Oregon.
>
>>>>>> Don't you think I know that isn't precisely where you live. �I was
>>>>>> making a point. �Many people do know where you live, and the
>>>>>> information is available on the net.
>
>>>>>>>And that is precisely why BB asked
>>>>>>> you not to keep mentioning his real name on usenet ... someone HAD
>>>>>>> shown up at his door and scared the living daylights out of his wife.
>
>>>>>> And that same person couldn't find him on another public forum on the
>>>>>> net? �If he is that controversial, anybody with an agenda could very
>>>>>> well do that, couldn't they? �They could do that to me too, couldn't
>>>>>> they? �And to you as well?
>
>>>>>>> For anyone, it's a good idea to be mindful of possible repercussions
>>>>>>> before railing on and on and on about people making accusations ...
>>>>>>> the world is not always a kinder and gentler place for any of us.
>
>>>>>> And the same can be said for your endless posting on this subject in
>>>>>> order to try to make some sort of obscure point, and now adding
>>>>>> chapters on entirely different subjects. �Have you lost all
>>>>>> perspective?
>
>>>>>>>>> Second of all ... the Ed Forum is a private group, and one logs in.
>
>>>>>>>>It is a public forum. �Anyone can join. So is usenet. �They are both
>>>>>>>>on the internet. �Picking one to be public and another to be private
>>>>>>>>is trying to have it both ways.
>
>>>>>>> One needs a password for the Ed forum. You're trying to justify your
>>>>>>> continuing to rail nonsense about BB using his real name, even after
>>>>>>> he repeatedly asked you not to do that.
>
>>>>>> Anyone can register and log in -- it is a public forum. �Do you know
>>>>>> what that means? �What is gained by continuing to bring it up?
>
>>>>>>> Nothing else matters. That is the issue. It is not for you to decide
>>>>>>> for him how like or unlike the forums he chooses to post on are.
>
>>>>>> You're making my point for me again. �It is his choice to post
>>>>>> wherever he wants and take whatever risks involved.
>
>>>>>>>>> AGAIN..regardless, it is Blackburt's request and personal preference.
>>>>>>>>> For someone always yacking about respect, you sure don't show much of
>>>>>>>>> it to others.
>
>>>>>>>>I didn't even use his screen name in my post, nor have I for some
>>>>>>>>time. �I call him BB.
>
>>>>>>> You weren't before.
>
>>>>>>>>It is my request that you and your attack gopher respect my privacy,
>>>>>>>>but do you?
>
>>>>>>>>> What is it to YOU *WHAT* he chooses to call
>
> ...
>
> read more �- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
