|
|
Up |
  |
Author: Neil CoburnNeil Coburn
Date: May 31, 2008 16:30
Did any investigator report tattoo's on anyone claiming to be Oswald?
|
| |
|
12 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Todd W. VaughanTodd W. Vaughan
Date: May 31, 2008 13:03
Greetings,
Still on the road. Different Wendy's.
Todd
|
| |
|
7 Comments |
|
  |
Author:
Date: May 31, 2008 12:01
Mark North’s “Act of Treason” discusses all things Hoover as he writes
about JEH’s active involvement in the assassination and the cover-up
that followed. One man did try and challenge the powerful head of the
FBI though, and suprisingly it was someone on the WC itself.
Chief counsel Rankin was considered the least political of all the
members and he quickly leaked some news regarding JEH when he joined
the Commission. He told the media that JEH was pressuring the
Commission to conclude the investigation by February, something he
considered a practical impossibility. In his very first staff meeting
things got so hot in terms of what their focus and goals should be,
and basically degenerated into a standoff, they never had anymore
staff meetings! Rankin would tell his staff, perhaps at this very
meeting, that Hoover COULDN’T be trusted. This would get back to
Hoover via Ford, who would become a “snitch” for the FBI as Dulles
does the same for the CIA.
|
| Show full article (4.68Kb) |
|
5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Todd W. VaughanTodd W. Vaughan
Date: May 31, 2008 09:59
Gil,
Have you found your source for your claim the paraffin was applied to
LHO "at 3:45 pm, about an hour after
Oswald was arrested."
I think it was Walt who made a similar claim way back when. I took
both his, and now your claim seriously, but there's just no evidence
for it. All of the evidence indactes it was done at around 9:00 pm.
You do realize that at 3:45 pm, LHO was in the middle of the 1st DPD
interogation session, and there was no paraffin applied to him at that
time, right? Hell, at that time he still had .38 caliber cartridges n
his pocket!
Todd
|
| |
|
14 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Gil JesusGil Jesus
Date: May 31, 2008 09:11
Toodles likes to post through corporate servers.
They call that "stealing" internet access.
First he posts through Pfizer's server, now he
posts through the server of the American Cancer Society.
Hostname: 207.179.100.54
ISP: ACD Internet Services
Organization: AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
Proxy: None detected
Type: Corporate
Country: United States
State/Region: MI
City: Jackson
Latitude: 42.2468
Longitude: -84.3621
Area Code: 517
Accessing the internet through a non-profit charity ?
wow, THAT'S low.
|
| |
|
36 Comments |
|
  |
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 31, 2008 01:16
>>> "Why did you want to drag me {a kook named Walter Cakebread} into this debate? You know I'll just show you to be a lying ignoramus." <<<
This is kind of like a turtle saying to a rabbit: "Why bother racing
me, Mr. Rabbit? You know I'll just end up beating you by a mile."
(Does anybody really know if Walt The Kook ACTUALLY believes he has
defeated ANY LNer on this board [or any other board] with his make-
believe bullcrap? If he does, the word 'delusional' comes to mind
immediately.)
>>> "Brennan said he saw the gunman moving back and forth behind WINDOWS (plural) on the sixth floor." <<<
Lookie! Walt is skewing the evidence again! What a surprise!
Please provide a cite for your above lie, Walt-Kook.
>>> "Brennan was referring to the window where he had seen the LIGHT CLOTHING clad gunman BEFORE the motorcade's arrival. In his afidavit [sic] he DESCRIBED the window where he'd seen the WHITE CLOTHING clad gunman aiming the rifle AT THE TIME of the shooting. The ONLY window that matches his DESCRIPTION was at the WEST end of the sixth floor." <<<
I'm certainly not going to once again type out the actual evidence
that proves "Walt The Ultra-Mega-Kook" to be dead-wrong (as per
usual). We've been over this multiple times previously...and I've
totally demolished Walt's ridiculous "BRENNAN WAS DESCRIBING THE WEST-
END WINDOW" bullshit several times over.
|
| Show full article (2.28Kb) |
|
6 Comments |
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: May 31, 2008 01:12
Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try
to attack the Warren Commission Report . In the past , there have been
only two semi-serious attempts to answer them , one by Ben Holmes ,
and one by 'Sak'O'nuts' (the troll listed below) - Both responses were
basically denials of the facts in most of the
'answers' .
But first , an important note :
**********************************************************************
Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal
insults and attacks.
These trolls include (but are not limited to) :
|
| Show full article (2.67Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: pjjvermeulenpjjvermeulen
Date: May 31, 2008 01:07
Declassification of documents, when is it going to happen?
Several years are named on the internet: 2009, 2017, 2029, 2939...
thx for answering...
|
| |
|
11 Comments |
|
  |
Author: tomnlntomnln
Date: May 30, 2008 21:33
in case McAdams don't post this one;
Hey yeuhd;
If julia postal did NOT see Oswald enter the theater........
HOW COULD SHE "POINT HIM OUT"????
"yeuhd" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3fb1c59f-107b-4d0c-8aeb-cfaf11117c30@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 30, 8:38 pm, John Blubaugh yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why
> didn't he pay to get in instead of attracting unwanted attention?
"Mrs. Postal, did a white male, thirty, five feet eight, black hair,
slender build, white shirt, black trousers, buy a ticket from you and
enter the theater within the last 20 minutes?
"Yes he did, officer, but he wasn't wearing a jacket. Would you like me to
point him out to you?
"Please do."
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|