|
|
 Up |
  |
|
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 17, 2008 22:35
>>> "Are you sure that is an accurate statement? Oswald was seen before the shooting and even after the shooting, but no one saw him while the shooting was happening..." <<<
That's (technically) not true, Bill. Howard Brennan *did* see Oswald
"while the shooting was happening".
But, even for CTers who don't buy Brennan's eyewitness account, it's a
virtual certainty that Oswald was INSIDE the Depository when the
assassination was taking place -- unless you want to believe that
Oswald dashed to the second-floor lunchroom FROM OUTSIDE THE BUILDING
in the 90 seconds after the shooting.
As for Oswald being the ONLY employee who was INSIDE the TSBD to have
left work early -- I do believe I have that correct.
Jean Davison (a very respected researcher, IMO) seems to think so too.
And she has said so here at Lancer (in my "Point-By-Point" thread in
fact). .....
JFK-Lancer Post #17949 (July 20, 2003):
"Oswald, OTOH, was the only employee who'd been INSIDE at the
time of the shooting who left work BEFORE the building was sealed
off." -- Jean Davison
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
|
10 Comments |
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 17, 2008 21:15
>>> "The body was removed from the casket sometime while AF-1 was still on the ground, possibly during the swearing in of Johnson and while Mrs. Kennedy was in the front of the plane." <<<
So -- the "body thieves" somehow took JFK out of the bronze casket ON
BOARD THE AIRCRAFT, stuffed some other 170-pound "weight" in the
coffin, and waltzed out of the plane -- all without one single
solitary person on the tarmac at Love Field OR anyone ON THE PLANE
ITSELF noticing ANY of this odd activity. Correct or incorrect?
And the "tarmac" witnesses would include several press people and who
knows how many guards and USSS Agents who were by this time guarding
the plane with eyes peeled for strange occurrences, due to the fact
that LBJ and others suspected a possible "plot" of some kind, and
rightly so at this time, very shortly after JFK was killed. No one
knew it was just one lone stock clerk who did the shooting at this
time; so, obviously, security was VERY high around that Boeing 707 at
Love Field.
|
| Show full article (4.43Kb) |
|
11 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: May 17, 2008 20:38
Quote Ricland :
Genius or Megalomania?
For example, "The Manhattan Project" would not have been successful
hadn't our scientists borrowed from both Einstein and the Nazis .
TL replied :
Ouch ! Ricland , I see know why you love conspiracy . It's the
easy way out . You don't have to put too much brain power to work and
you can let your wits wander as much as you like .
For your edification :
Einstein's E=mc2 was not a prescription for a bomb , it was a
description
of nature .
Some of the early work on the bomb came out of Nazi Germany but
it was very limited and quickly went no where . The Manhattan Project
was soley a American design/build adventure .
I still don't see why we get the honor of giving you a education
for free , most people , except for conspiracists don't open their
mouths
until they understand the assassination backwards and forwards .
|
| Show full article (1.57Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 17, 2008 19:17
>>> DVP Quote: "Mr. Connally's testimony IS MOST CERTAINLY WORTHLESS with regard to his very own opinion as to which shot struck JFK, the 1st or the 2nd -- because he admits he never saw the President." <<<
>>> ROBIN: "David, until now i have stayed silent as i read your Lone Nutter Ramblings. But in my opinion you have stepped over the mark with the quote above." <<<
Why? That quote of mine is 100%% accurate and undeniably true. Fact is:
Mr. Connally NEVER SAW JFK HIT. Period! Therefore, WHY would he be
considered a "good eyewitness"? Or even a "fair" one? Someone who
DOESN'T actually see something is certainly NOT an excellent and
unimpeachable source.
>>> "Connally was in the car that day so was his wife; where do you come off saying that their opinions are "worthless"?" <<<
I never said Mrs. Connally's testimony was worthless, and you won't
find a quote of mine saying that. Although I *DO* think Nellie has it
wrong; and I said why earlier. Plus: she most definitely has some
(proveable) incorrect info in her WC testimony (re. the exact timing),
thereby raising doubts about her memory re. the remainder of her
testimony.
MR. Connally's testimony with regard to what he HEARD is, of course,
not worthless at all. IT fits perfectly with the SBT, in fact.
|
| Show full article (2.35Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: tomnlntomnln
Date: May 17, 2008 16:42
In case McAdams don't post this one.
gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f7749b7a-800b-4794-a8aa-5fa25241b8d6@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
MIDDLE POST
Ah, tomnln, there you are. Now I think it might be time we had a
little chat, tomnln, what do you think? Firstly, let's address the
points you raise below that don't support your argument in the
slightest:
The official Records already show you to be Wrong Timmy;
On May 14, 1:40 pm, "tomnln" cox.net> wrote: *************************
> Seems a bit unlikely doesn't it Tony? He's got their phone number written
> down in his note book. That indicates he's likely to call them at some
> point. It seeems much more likely that Oswald made the call than that the
> CIA did.
|
| Show full article (10.28Kb) |
|
10 Comments |
|
|
Author: tomnlntomnln
Date: May 17, 2008 16:40
In case McAdams don't post this one.
gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a8b5e0b5-77d8-48cb-978a-e06c742628e7@b9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
TOP POST
Hi Tony,
So, no matter how bogus the story, you still have to get in your dig
about the CIA, eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy wrote;
Oswald had NOTHING to do with the CIA, in an operative sense. Just
like this idiot, Angelo Murgado, had NOTHING to do with showing RFK
non existent *newspaper photos* of Oswald's FPCC activities in New
Orleans.
I write;
CIA Employee proves you Wrong AGAIN>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy wrote;
|
| Show full article (6.45Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
