|
|
Up |
  |
|
|
  |
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 11, 2008 18:40
>>> "Hey there Dave, have you had a chance to rebut [Jim] Fetzer's review of [Vincent Bugliosi's] book (attached) or read his "reasoning" article? If you have and it's on the web somewhere, drop me the link. /s/James .... PS: btw, he emailed these to me after I shot an email to him re his views of the assassination. .... PSS: good job rebutting Pat Speer's ridiculous "logic" on Myers' graphics presentation." <<<
Hi James,
I think I've seen those two Fetzer articles you sent me [linked
below]. .....
www.assassinationscience.com/ReasoningAboutAssassinations.pdf
www.assassinationscience.com/v5n1fetzer.pdf
It's all total crap, of course, with Dr. Fetzer seemingly pulling out
every last tired and already-trashed conspiracy theory in existence
since '64 to try and prove his case for a massive plot to kill JFK.
(Plus the newer nonsense about the Z-Film being "wholly fabricated",
which is a theory that's always good for a robust giggle or two.)
A couple of my favorite laugh-inducing passages from Fetzer's review
of Vincent Bugliosi's book are these:
"While he [Bugliosi] claims to have 53 items of evidence
incriminating Oswald, he also dismisses indications that most if not
all of them appear to be planted, faked or fabricated." -- JHF
|
| Show full article (5.42Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: May 11, 2008 18:39
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/jfk_truthers_finally_losing_gr.html
" Oswald left enough evidence behind to be convicted multiple
times"
American Thinker May 11 , 2008
--------------------------------------------------
By John Huettner
--------------------------------------------------
Before the 9/11 truthers came the JFK truthers. Fantasies about dark
machinations surrounding the death of President Kennedy laid the
spiritual groundwork for today's claims of bizarre plots behind the
events of 9/11. In both cases, the obviously guilty culprits are
ignored in favor of more desirable political targets.
It has been forty-four years since Lee Harvey Oswald killed President
Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Oswald was silenced two mornings later;
but only after a bizarre getaway, cop killing, capture and brief
notoriety, culminating in his televised shooting by Dallas strip club
owner Jack Ruby. Not until 9/11 did live television again witness
such an American tragedy.
|
| Show full article (10.82Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 11, 2008 18:38
>>> "Hey there Dave, have you had a chance to rebut [Jim] Fetzer's review of [Vincent Bugliosi's] book (attached) or read his "reasoning" article? If you have and it's on the web somewhere, drop me the link. /s/ James .... PS: btw, he emailed these to me after I shot an email to him re his views of the assassination. .... PSS: good job rebutting Pat Speer's ridiculous "logic" on Myers' graphics presentation." <<<
Hi James,
I think I've seen those two Fetzer articles you sent me [linked
below]. .....
www.assassinationscience.com/ReasoningAboutAssassinations.pdf
www.assassinationscience.com/v5n1fetzer.pdf
It's all total crap, of course, with Dr. Fetzer seemingly pulling out
every last tired and already-trashed conspiracy theory in existence
since '64 to try and prove his case for a massive plot to kill JFK.
(Plus the newer nonsense about the Z-Film being "wholly fabricated",
which is a theory that's always good for a robust giggle or two.)
A couple of my favorite laugh-inducing passages from Fetzer's review
of Vincent Bugliosi's book are these:
"While he [Bugliosi] claims to have 53 items of evidence
incriminating Oswald, he also dismisses indications that most if not
all of them appear to be planted, faked or fabricated." -- JHF
|
| Show full article (5.42Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 11, 2008 18:31
>>> "Hey there Dave, have you had a chance to rebut [Jim] Fetzer's review of VB's [Vince Bugliosi's] book (attached) or read his "reasoning" article? If you have and it's on the web somewhere, drop me the link. /s/ James .... PS: btw, he emailed these to me after I shot an email to him re his views of the assassination. .... PSS: good job rebutting Pat Speer's ridiculous "logic" on Myers' graphics presentation." <<<
Hi James,
I think I've seen those two Fetzer articles you sent me [linked
below]. .....
www.assassinationscience.com/ReasoningAboutAssassinations.pdf
www.assassinationscience.com/v5n1fetzer.pdf
It's all total crap, of course, with Dr. Fetzer seemingly pulling out
every last tired and already-trashed conspiracy theory in existence
since '64 to try and prove his case for a massive plot to kill JFK.
(Plus the newer nonsense about the Z-Film being "wholly fabricated",
which is a theory that's always good for a robust giggle or two.)
A couple of my favorite laugh-inducing passages from Fetzer's review
of Vincent Bugliosi's book are these:
"While he [Bugliosi] claims to have 53 items of evidence
incriminating Oswald, he also dismisses indications that most if not
all of them appear to be planted, faked or fabricated." -- JHF
|
| Show full article (5.42Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: May 11, 2008 18:14
>>> "Hey there Dave, have you had a chance to rebut Fetzer's review of VB's book (attached) or read his "reasoning" article? If you have and it's on the web somewhere, drop me the link. /s/ James .... PS: btw, he emailed these to me after I shot an email to him re his views of the assassination. .... PSS: good job rebutting Pat Speer's ridiculous "logic" on Myers' graphics presentation." <<<
Hi James,
I think I've seen those two Fetzer articles you sent me [linked
below]. .....
www.assassinationscience.com/ReasoningAboutAssassinations.pdf
www.assassinationscience.com/v5n1fetzer.pdf
It's all total crap, of course, with Dr. Fetzer seemingly pulling out
every last tired and already-trashed conspiracy theory in existence
since '64 to try and prove his case for a massive plot to kill JFK.
(Plus the newer nonsense about the Z-Film being "wholly fabricated",
which is a theory that's always good for a robust giggle or two.)
A couple of my favorite laugh-inducing passages from Fetzer's review
of Vincent Bugliosi's book are these:
"While he [Bugliosi] claims to have 53 items of evidence
incriminating Oswald, he also dismisses indications that most if not
all of them appear to be planted, faked or fabricated." -- JHF
|
| Show full article (5.35Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: May 11, 2008 18:01
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6R1RtzB7z4
CNN Video : 911 Inside Job Explosives Used 1st Time Said :
If you have a education system with kooky college prof.'s teaching
conspiracy will it be a wonder college graduates are ready to just do
one thing ? :
Start filling out their unemployment forms ?
Comments ?
:-(
tl
PS : (-: John if you see this guy wack him upside his head once for
us ! :-)
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|