|
|
Up |
  |
Author: aeffectsaeffects
Date: Jan 27, 2008 20:30
we need he/she/its insight concerning the JFK assassination and
surrounding conspiracy.....
After all, with Sammy daTuna's 2300 posts to this board (and counting)
and not one word concerning the assassination, she must have something
hiding between those unshaved legs thats worthy of all this herculian
USNET effort.....
One thing we know for sure, they'll be no inbreeding is Sammy from
down-undah's current family (there is none, thank the lord)
-- perhaps
family sexual perversion is the reason for Sammy's fascination with
munching?
|
| |
|
5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: Jan 27, 2008 20:12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzoXQKumgCw&feature=dir
Is The Government Spying On Paranoid Schizophrenics Enough .........?
Onion News Network :
In The Know :
Panelists discuss ways to care for the nation's paranoid
schizophrenics, such as hiding cameras in their homes or audio
transmitters in their ears .
Here are some choice comments on this video below :
wirepalone wrote at YouTube :
" You have a right to be crazy in this country. Never give up any
right to the Government."
Bustercloud wrote at YouTube :
" Dear god I love this video so much."
oldbaldy129 wrote at YouTube :
" This is a great video!! "
End ...................................
Now whether or not paranoid schizophrenics and your garden variety
paranoid mentality are the same would be a interesting thread for
discussion in regards to the JFK Assassination .
|
| Show full article (0.88Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Chuck SchuylerChuck Schuyler
Date: Jan 27, 2008 20:06
On Jan 26, 12:59 pm, Robert Harris yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I look at witness statements because those people were there during the
> assassination and can tell us what happened, Chuck.
What witnesses have to say can be important, but witnesses can also be
wildly wrong, or their recollections can be open to odd interpretation.
You seem to find a speck of information that can be broadly interpreted as
being opposed to the WC conclusions and then you build these massive
conspiracies on flimsy 'evidence'.
>
> I then compare what they said, with their actions in the films and
> photos, to confirm or deny their accuracy.
Why don't you compare what they said with the physical evidence? Sort
eyewitness/earwitness accounts for consistency and for agreement with the
recovered rifle, shells, etc. and discard the silly stuff. Either that, or
you maybe you'll be thrilling us with your new conspiracy theory involving
the fluffy little white dog Jean Hill saw.
|
| Show full article (4.51Kb) |
|
13 Comments |
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: Jan 27, 2008 18:31
That would be the blood of Lee Harvey Oswald that was flowing through
the kids."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For sickos Rossley , Gilstapo , Healy and Co. :
Thanks for bringing this forward PF . It reinforces what I've been
saying for years about the obsession with this case and who gets
attracted to it :
" He said things when we were together like he really wanted to
have children because "that would be the blood of Lee Harvey
Oswald that was flowing through the kids."
This statement pretty well describes the kind of person who
would take pride that a presidential and police murderer would
be in the blood of his offspring . So do you think this is any
different than trying to exonerate LHO ?
Just curious .
tl
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEE HARVEY'S OLDEST
JUNE OSWALD
|
| Show full article (19.77Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: Jan 27, 2008 18:11
"Wound was in the back of the head"
00:12
Added: 4 months ago
Views: 1,571
FBI Man saw "large wound at BOH
00:14
Added: 4 months ago
Views: 970
JFK's Trade Mart Speech
01:30
Added: 4 months ago
Views: 878
Witness: Small wound in front
00:41
Added: 4 months ago
Views: 743
|
| Show full article (0.77Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: bigdogbigdog
Date: Jan 27, 2008 17:49
On Jan 25, 4:31 pm, YoHarvey gmail.com> wrote:
> 10. It was Gil....or a toaster.
> 9. His father needed a $300 trade in for a new car.
Who was the dumbfuck who thought Jesus was worth a $300 trade in?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Sam BrownSam Brown
Date: Jan 27, 2008 16:34
"YoHarvey" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7f1beb2d-8c2b-4eb3-9520-67812f8820a5@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 26, 9:58 am, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:
> Let's see if there is any corroboration for my contention that a rifle
> was sticking out the window:
>
> Amos Lee Euins, a 15-year-old ninth grade student, stated that he was
> facing the Depository as the motorcade turned the corner at Elm and
> Houston. He recalled:
>
> "Then I was standing here, and as the motorcade turned the corner, I
> was facing, looking dead at the building. And so I seen this pipe
> thing sticking out the window." (WCR Ch 3, pg.64)
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> Robert H. Jackson, staff photographer, Dallas Times Herald, was in a
> press car in the Presidential motorcade, eight or nine cars from the
> front. On Houston Street about halfway between Main and Elm, Jackson
> heard the first shot. He testified:
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.42Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Sam BrownSam Brown
Date: Jan 27, 2008 16:31
> Tom:
>
> Justme's next posting addressing evidence will be her first.
>
> Justme's next posting citing testimony will be her first.
>
> She called me a racist. I asked her to post a link to ANY racist
> remark that I EVER made. She failed to.
"I have never advocated violence against gays or people of color". Remember
those little pearls of wisdom Gilly the bigot? Fucking racist, bigotted
scumsucker. Liar.
>
> She said I said Connally killed JFK. I asked her to post a link to ANY
> posting where I used the phrase "Connaly killed JFK" or even "Connally
> shot JFK".
> She failed to.
>
> She accused me of being...
|
| Show full article (1.40Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Sam BrownSam Brown
Date: Jan 27, 2008 16:30
"tomnln" cox.net> wrote in message
news:lqzmj.6262$HL1.5177@newsfe21.lga...
>
> "YoHarvey" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5ff103bb-7928-46e5-a469-e270a418612d@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, "tomnln" cox.net> wrote:
>> "YoHarvey" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:15b5e9c6-fd6c-4e22-af73-3bd8e279c0b4@m34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 25, 5:54 pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
>> wrote:> On Jan 25, 5:38 pm, Gil Jesus aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Where are the shadows, blunderbrain ? Where's the "dark spot" ? Not
>>>> there, but there is something dark in that lower right hand corner in
>>>> the same shape and position as the rifle in the Powell photo.
>>
>>>> You know it and THAT'S why you're pissed.
>>
>>> I wouldn't get pissed because your stupid enough to think you see a
>>> gun. There is no gun in the Powell photo either. ...
|
| Show full article (2.84Kb) |
|
5 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|