|
|
 Up |
  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: tomnlntomnln
Date: Jan 9, 2008 20:07
In case McAdams don't post this one.
"yeuhd" mailbag.com> wrote in message
news:5f3be9c7-740c-46d8-bf40-739e486c932d@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...> Tim, you're not up on the speak. You have to use CAPITAL LETTERS and
> SUCH, and end your questions with multiple question marks, okay??? Be
> SURE to call people a LIAR a lot. And talk about how you use only
> OFFICIAL sources.
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: garyNOSPAMgaryNOSPAM
Date: Jan 9, 2008 19:43
It is fascinating, and instructive, to compare the reaction by the
"mainstream media" to Oliver Stone's film "JFK," a film which endorsed the
vast majority's distrust of the Warren Commission against the the
mandarins of the mainstream who've always stood foursquare with the govt.,
and the "mainstream's" reaction to Tom Hanks' new film, "Charlie Wilson's
War."
Hanks' film, which I saw with my son, is very entertaining, very
patriotic, very propagandistic and its history is very, very incomplete,
which is to say it's wrong. But to read reviews in the major dailies,
you'd never guess that. Apparently, flawed history in films is only
considered a problem when the the history shows the government in a
negative light, as it (rightly) did in the Stone's "JFK." But when filmic
fantasy is "patriotic," in films such as "The Green Berets," or the first
rendition of "The Quiet American," the version that had turned the real
message of Graham Greene's book upside down, why none of our moral
monitors find it necessary to correct the record.
|
| Show full article (16.76Kb) |
|
13 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Gary AGary A
Date: Jan 9, 2008 13:32
Warren loyalists Dale Myers and Todd Vaughan (he quibbles whether
that's an apt rap) have an excellent piece demolishing Max Holland's
latest imbecility, one that graced the pages of the New York Times.
The amusing, and very telling, part of the affair is that Myers and
Vaughan had debunked the same silly thesis Holland published in the NY
Times months before, when he was running a near-identical version of
it. Shamelessly, if predictably, he ran with it anyway, and of course
the "Paper of Record" has always been shameless and ran with it and,
as I understand it, has refused to correct the record despite appeals
it do so.
* To anyone familiar with the Judy Miller's bogus scare stories about
Saddam's imminent WMD's in the run up to war that were blasted across
the front page of the New York Times, stories that helped get us
unleash the terrible dogs of war;
|
| Show full article (12.30Kb) |
|
19 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein
Date: Jan 9, 2008 12:43
DEBUNKING THE HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE'S
ACOUSTICS EVIDENCE.....
===========================================
"If you could prove to me that there was no police officer in
the place where he had to be, you would falsify {the acoustics
evidence}." -- G. Robert Blakey; 2003
===========================================
Well, Dale K. Myers has certainly done that, Mr. Blakey. .....
http://jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/acoustics.htm
In fact, upon looking at the Robert Hughes film a few additional times
recently, it's very, very easy to debunk the HSCA's acoustics
(Dictabelt) evidence via JUST THE HUGHES FILM ALONE.
Why?
Because it's obvious from the Hughes Film that there is not going to
be a DPD police motorcycle in the area near the intersection of Elm &
Houston Streets by the time the first shot occurs (which the HSCA said
was fired at about Zapruder Frame #157).....
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/html/HSCA_Report_0039a.htm
|
| Show full article (3.80Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
