Thought From a Serious Conspiracy Researcher

My research has shown over 75%% of all alleged facts in this case are
false. Just take any book and compare the author's conclusions to
another author's conclusions. Check each alleged fact in each book
and see how many cancel or contradict each other. If all the alleged
facts in all the conspiracy books were true, we could expect to have
the following conclusions:

The Grassy Knoll was a very busy place with many gunmen who never saw
each other.

There were at least 10 individuals depicted in the photos of the three
tramps.

There were at least 30 gunmen firing from 4 different buildings, the
overpass, the Grassy Knoll, the South Knoll, the Presidential limo, the
Secret Service follow-up car, the curb on Elm Street and the sewer.
There were at least 100 conspirators in Dealey Plaza.

These "facts" seem absurd and ridiculous but this is exactly what we
end up with if we believe all of the conspiracy books which have been
published. (Source: Bill Adams, "The Enemy Within

Really folks , he needs all the help he can get !

Tomln Web Site Here :

http://tomrossley.home.comcast.net/
http://tomrossley.home.comcast.net/mexcity.html
http://tomrossley.home.comcast.net/photopage.htm
http://tomrossley.home.comcast.net/photopage2.htm

Created by the Worlds Foremost Authority on ' Who didn't kill JFK '

Tom Lowry replied :

Well Robert , if there all mutually exclusive of each other and the
Assassination could only of happened one way , I don't think Ed needs
to
disprove 99%% of them as being wrong . With brings up the interesting
thought , that if 99%% are constructs , as indeed your Z-285 is , isn't
it
most likely that there all constructs , undeserving of the time to
rehash
how they have all been disproven already ? I really don't expect an
answer
from Robert , when he see's this he'll be running back to acj to post
again and I'll have to run after him , to get a answer , so this time
I'll
post ahead of him ................TL

Robert Harris replied :

Ed, you seem to have left out the minor step in which you prove that
these
theories "bit the dust" :-) Empty, unsupported assertions seem to

Sure you want all the lies of Mark Lane ? Start here :

Bogus Evidence :

Mark Lane - Honest Advocate?

No one has been more assiduous in promoting conspiracy theories than
lawyer Mark Lane . And his lectures and books (especially Rush to
Judgment and Plausible Denial) have been extremely influential. But...

Mark Lame ' The King of Telling Half the Story ' .......... Aeffects ,
Boy ! Wake up , I be talking to that brain dead head of yers . Since
you enjoy half the story , that must make you a half wit , Yo ! Right ?
Yo !.....................TL

PS : Maybe you and Rossley Retarded put two half brains together ,
makee whole ' One Brainer Theory ' that mekes sense ? !
..................

In article <1165442468.292611.44650@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, aeffects
says...

Regarding George Allen

While we are still hopeful that the tactics used in the 2006
election in Virginia can be exposed, and James Webb can be made to
step aside as a result of those tactics being exposed, so that
George Allen can resume his rightful seat in the US Senate, and go
on from there to the Presidency,there are other paths to 1600
Pennsylvania Avenue.

One of them was taken by one George Herbert Walker Bush, whose
resume includes a stint as US Ambassador to the United Nations.

The recent shameful decision not to re-name Ambassador Bolton to his
rightful seat at the United Nations in a recess appointment, as he
is still blocked in the US Senate, should not stand, but it appears
that it will anyway.

We urge you to contact President Bush and tell him that he should
name George Allen to the post of UN Ambassador now.

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Phone Numbers

Crack researcher and superslueth Ben Holmes and his sidekicks in
silliness, David Healey and Tom Rossley, claim the Zapruder film has
been altered.

This is a departure from CT'ers who claim the film is legit...and that
it shows incontrovertible proof of conspiracy (back and to the
left...back and to the left...).

In a plot as sinister as the one to murder JFK, why not just destroy
the gosh darn film or say it was lost?