Author: Ben HolmesBen Holmes
Date: Dec 2, 2006 10:47
In article newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>, Martin Shackelford
says...
>
>Anyone who calls Tony an "apologist for the WCR" is displaying his
>blatant ignorance. Tony's work on the acoustics evidence significantly
>undermined the claims of the Warren Commission.
Would you be willing to defend his assertion that the theory that the autopsy
report was changed *when* they heard that LHO had been killed - thus making a
courtroom appearance impossible?
He did so by asserting that Dr. Humes had burned the paperwork on *SATURDAY
MORNING*, not Sunday - after LHO was killed.
>Martin
>
>tomnln wrote:
>
>> As an "Apologist" for the WCR, tony always alludes to "mistakes" without
>> ever offering Proof.
>>
>> ALL of tony's Excuses for the WCR are nothing other than "Opinions"...
|