alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi only
 
Advanced search
January 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 1
891011121314 2
15161718192021 3
22232425262728 4
293031     5
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2007 2006    
total
alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...
 Up
  Re: looking for jpeg.pas         


Author: Frank de Groot
Date: Jan 18, 2007 09:39

"Rudy Velthuis" wrote
> You were caught with your hand in the cookie jar, and now you try to
> wind out by insulting others and justifying it by something Borland
> allegedly did to you.

For what Borland did to me, morally spoken (following the Bible's rules of
the Old Testament) I am allowed to inflict similar damage to Borland.
If we look at it percentually, I am allowed to bankrupt Borland.
no comments
  Re: looking for jpeg.pas         


Author: Frank de Groot
Date: Jan 18, 2007 09:38

"Rudy Velthuis" wrote
> You posted here, not somewhere else, and I happened to see it. Your bad
> if people call you on asking for an illegal copy of something.

Then again, your bad if I explain how Borland screws their customers.
no comments
  Re: looking for jpeg.pas         


Author: Frank de Groot
Date: Jan 18, 2007 09:37

"Rudy Velthuis" wrote
> We are not. We are independent, unpaid volunteers.

Double lie.

#1: You have to abide by the rules Borland stipulates for you,

#2: You get paid many thousands USD in free merchandise.
no comments
  Re: looking for jpeg.pas         


Author: Frank de Groot
Date: Jan 18, 2007 09:36

"Rudy Velthuis" wrote
> When have I "poisoned" you, and where is that money I allegedly got for
> it? When was there a situation you had to trust me?

When did you stop beating your wife?
no comments
  Re: looking for jpeg.pas         


Author: J French
Date: Jan 18, 2007 05:37

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:55:49 +0100, "Frank de Groot"
moyogo.com> wrote:
>"J French" wrote
>
>> Easy Frank, Rudy might be a dentist, but he is a pretty darn good
>> programmer - so he can't be all bad.
>That's an illogical statement if I ever saw one.
>How does being a good programmer makes up for deliberately poisoning people
>that trust you, for money?

Well it is a redeeming feature ...
>> Actually I think he is on Team B - which is rather impressive.
>Team B are shameful Borland employees.
>All they do is "push the party line" by censoring people who love Delphi.
>Borland/CodeGear's party line is Microsoft's (main share holder) party
>line - the destruction of Delphi.

They are not employees - more enthusiasts

Are you sure that MS still have a shareholding ?
- my understanding is that they got rid of it quite some time ago
Show full article (1.63Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: looking for jpeg.pas         


Author: Frank de Groot
Date: Jan 18, 2007 01:38

"Rudy Velthuis" wrote
> It is illegal for others to send it to you. Do you want others to break
> the laws for you?

Why don't you go moralizing somewhere else, like to your colleagues who
poison the planet and their inhabitants with mercury fillings and synthetic
fillings (they cause cancer).

Jeezes. Defending scum like Borland, who has singlehandedly left their
entire customer base in the cold - deliberately, and yourslef being part of
an evil mass-murdering bunch of serial killers (dentists have known for
decades about the effects of fillings on the human body).

Admonishing me about some fucking file, sheesh..
4 Comments
  Re: looking for jpeg.pas         


Author: Maarten Wiltink
Date: Jan 18, 2007 00:47

"J French" wrote in message
news:45ae9948.9582238@news.btopenworld.com...
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:09:18 +0100, "Maarten Wiltink"
> kittensandcats.net> wrote:
>> "J French" wrote in message
>> news:45ae7d77.2459481@news.btopenworld.com...
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:48:04 +0100, "Maarten Wiltink"
>>> kittensandcats.net> wrote:
>>>> Ethics is like dictionaries - descriptive only. Morals are personal.
>>>> Laws are for everyone... in theory.
>
>>> I have ethics, but no morals.
>
>> That's surprisingly difficult. ...
>
> Amorality does not preclude a lack of ethics

Having no morals is difficult. As I said, ethics is just the study of
them. Having no ethics means not thinking about the whole subject: the
standard way that most people go through the day, that is.
Show full article (1.50Kb)
no comments