|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Mike DeeMike Dee Date: May 11, 2008 23:54
Nicetameetya anonymous.invalid.con> wrote:
> Mike Dee told us in complete confidence:
>
>>I'm subbed to greatnowhere also, so I'll take care to send this via
>>another server, otherwise you may not read it ;-)
>
> Darn. I was hoping to see if my NP filter expression worked ;-)
Testing, testing, testing ;-)
Sending via GN.
--
dee
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mike DeeMike Dee Date: May 11, 2008 23:58
Nicetameetya anonymous.invalid.con> wrote:
> Just got two brief, but friendly replies from Peter Zeltins at
> greatnowhere.com telling me that the spammer's accounts have been
> "zapped."
Good news, I sent off a few headers too, but I guess that wont hurt.
Poor spammer will have to go back to google :-)
--
dee
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: NicetameetyaNicetameetya Date: May 12, 2008 00:16
[Default] On 12 May 2008 06:58:00 GMT, Mike Dee
told us in complete confidence:
>Nicetameetya anonymous.invalid.con> wrote:
>
>> Just got two brief, but friendly replies from Peter Zeltins at
>> greatnowhere.com telling me that the spammer's accounts have been
>> "zapped."
>
>Good news, I sent off a few headers too, but I guess that wont hurt.
>
>Poor spammer will have to go back to google :-)
That's good, because - for some unexplained reason - my NPfilter sure
doesn't pick the greatnowhere.com posts up at all ... ;-)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: May 12, 2008 02:58
>[Default] On 12 May 2008 06:58:00 GMT, Mike Dee
> told us in complete confidence:
>
>>Nicetameetya anonymous.invalid.con> wrote:
>>
>>> Just got two brief, but friendly replies from Peter Zeltins at
>>> greatnowhere.com telling me that the spammer's accounts have been
>>> "zapped."
>>
>>Good news, I sent off a few headers too, but I guess that wont hurt.
>>
>>Poor spammer will have to go back to google :-)
>
>That's good, because - for some unexplained reason - my NPfilter sure
>doesn't pick the greatnowhere.com posts up at all ... ;-)
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: M.L.M.L. Date: May 12, 2008 03:25
>>>> The following NewsProxy filter expressions work fine with
>>>> googlegroups, but it doesn't appear to be working with the
>>>> latest source of SPAM from the greatnowhere.com server. Any [...]
>>
>> Also noticed the spammer uses the same email address on most of
>> the posts. So I did a couple of global filters on the three
>> addresses used so far. ZAP! ;-)b
>
> Wouldn't it be better to just * drop From: *kmwkawrt@yahoo*
>
> There seems to be only one spammer who's dumb enough to use one name
> (at least this is all I've noticed so far). I can understand KF'ing
> Googlegroups, but to blanket kill a small free newsserver like
> greatnowhere, seems a bit of an over reaction.
Killing the entire domain provides an incentive for the newsserver to
get rid of the spammer (assuming that a complaint is sent to the
newsserver). That's exactly what happened in this case, so I unkilled
greatnowhere.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ron MayRon May Date: May 12, 2008 03:44
On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:16:23 +1200, Nicetameetya
anonymous.invalid.con> wrote:
> [Default] On 12 May 2008 06:58:00 GMT, Mike Dee
> told us in complete confidence:
>
>>Nicetameetya anonymous.invalid.con> wrote:
>>
>>> Just got two brief, but friendly replies from Peter Zeltins at
>>> greatnowhere.com telling me that the spammer's accounts have been
>>> "zapped."
>>
>>Good news, I sent off a few headers too, but I guess that wont hurt.
>>
>>Poor spammer will have to go back to google :-)
>
> That's good, because - for some unexplained reason - my NPfilter sure
> doesn't pick the greatnowhere.com posts up at all ... ;-)
Mine picked up one message after I "cycled" NP and Agent, but after
reading the rest of the thread, I'll drop that entry.
|
| Show full article (0.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: John CorlissJohn Corliss Date: May 12, 2008 04:18
Mike Dee wrote:
> Nicetameetya anonymous.invalid.con> wrote:
>
>> Just got two brief, but friendly replies from Peter Zeltins at
>> greatnowhere.com telling me that the spammer's accounts have been
>> "zapped."
>
> Good news, I sent off a few headers too, but I guess that wont hurt.
>
> Poor spammer will have to go back to google :-)
I sent an abuse complaint to peter at greatnowhere dot com yesterday. He
emailed me back that he's canceled the spammer's account. As I type this
though, the GN server doesn't respond.
--
John Corliss BS206. I use nFilter to block all crossposts and all Google
Groups posts because of Googlespam. No ad, cd, commercial, cripple,
demo, dotnet, nag, share, spy, time-limited, trial or web wares OR warez
for me, please.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: John CorlissJohn Corliss Date: May 12, 2008 04:20
M.L. wrote:
>>>>> The following NewsProxy filter expressions work fine with
>>>>> googlegroups, but it doesn't appear to be working with the
>>>>> latest source of SPAM from the greatnowhere.com server. Any [...]
>>>
>>> Also noticed the spammer uses the same email address on most of
>>> the posts. So I did a couple of global filters on the three
>>> addresses used so far. ZAP! ;-)b
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to just * drop From: *kmwkawrt@yahoo*
>>
>> There seems to be only one spammer who's dumb enough to use one name
>> (at least this is all I've noticed so far). I can understand KF'ing
>> Googlegroups, but to blanket kill a small free newsserver like
>> greatnowhere, seems a bit of an over reaction.
>
> Killing the entire domain provides an incentive for the newsserver to
> get rid of the spammer (assuming that a complaint is sent to the
> newsserver). That's exactly what happened in this case, so I unkilled
> greatnowhere. ...
|
| Show full article (1.44Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Mike DeeMike Dee Date: May 12, 2008 06:19
John Corliss wrote:
> Mike Dee wrote:
[...]
>> Poor spammer will have to go back to google :-)
>
> I sent an abuse complaint to peter at greatnowhere dot com
> yesterday. He emailed me back that he's canceled the spammer's
> account. As I type this though, the GN server doesn't respond.
Seems to be down right now. It was up and running a couple of hours
ago. Will try again later.
--
dee
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|