|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DBDB
Date: Jan 7, 2007 15:23
Yes, i could care less!
"Gini" verizon.com> wrote in message news:CLeoh.965$2D.197@trndny07...>
> "DB" wrote
>> big YAWN
> ==
> So why did you re-post (and cross-post) it all? These guys have been
> feuding /spamming here for years
> and are best ignored.
>
>
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: DBDB
Date: Jan 7, 2007 15:21
"Kenneth S." starpower.net> wrote in
> Let's be clear about this. The deadbeats list reflects very clearly
> what we all know. The CS system is grotesquely biased against men, and
> the reason for the bias is that men have no political clout in issues
> where the interests of the two sexes are in conflict.
The system is an insult to everything we know about creating equality and
fairness to everyone involved.
At present, the system is a groteque abuse of government power and shoudl
not be tolerated for any reason
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Kenneth S.Kenneth S.
Date: Jan 7, 2007 14:40
>
> Kenneth S. wrote:
>>> And upon receiving a news article about the Texas A.G. (who appears to
>>> be making political hay of the deadbroke dads, like his Michigan
>>> counterpart), I emailed the Texas A.G.'s Office and essentially asked
>>> them why, if Texas is the largest state in the lower 48, could they not
>>> even find ONE woman to go on their most-wanted lists...
>>>
>>> I'm still waiting for an answer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kenneth S. wrote:
>>>
>>>> I looked at the Texas list, and I know nothing of the
>>>> circumstances
>>>> of ...
|
| Show full article (5.90Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: krpkrp
Date: Jan 7, 2007 04:39
>>>>> Moore there is NO such investigation
>>>>> Guess again, dipshit.
>>> No guesses needed.
>>> Okay by me. Don't guess then. You will be finding out first hand.
>> Like so many things you have claimed. Where's the FRONT PAGE STORY on
>> me in the New York Times Davey????
>>> IF there were, anyone who knows you knows you'd be splashing who was
>>> doing it in EVERY newsgroup on the net.
>>>
>>> Like you and your degree?
>> So WHO is doing the investigation? The East Podunk Secret Police?
< Tee hee NO answer what a SHOCK!!!!!!>
>>>>> Moore your constant phone calls to authorities are being recorded.
>>>>> None have occurred, idiot. What are they recording, white
>>>>> noise?
|
| Show full article (2.96Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: ghostwriterghostwriter
Date: Jan 6, 2007 17:38
DB wrote:
> Did hysteria fuel the development of the draconian CS laws we have now?
>
> It's obvious that the government cares little about the well being of NCP's,
> but do they have to go to extreme measures to squeeze every last dime that
> they might have.
>
> Imagine that you are down and out broke with only just enough to pay the
> rent next month and they find a way seize that small amount of money from
> you.
>
> Seems to me that if they set the CS rates to a reasonable rate, they
> wouldn't have half the problems they do now!
|
| Show full article (1.95Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: TimTim
Date: Jan 6, 2007 12:25
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:28:06 GMT, "DB" sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Did hysteria fuel the development of the draconian CS laws we have now?
>
>It's obvious that the government cares little about the well being of NCP's,
>but do they have to go to extreme measures to squeeze every last dime that
>they might have.
>
>Imagine that you are down and out broke with only just enough to pay the
>rent next month and they find a way seize that small amount of money from
>you.
>
>Seems to me that if they set the CS rates to a reasonable rate, they
>wouldn't have half the problems they do now!
>
The ONLY fair way to do it would be to apply the same laws to NCP's
that married parents face now, which is to say that you assume that
the NCP will naturally want to do what is best for their child.
If you use that as a starting point instead of assuming that all or
most NCP's are criminals then the rules would change quite a bit.
|
| Show full article (2.80Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: John MeyerJohn Meyer
Date: Jan 6, 2007 12:24
It gets worse than that. I'm trying to google a story about a man found
by the police who had broken into a seasonal home and was staying there.
The man told the police that his child support payments had left him
with a $100 a week to live on. From my own experience, I can believe that.
Child support developed from an overplayed stereotype in the media about
deadbeat dads living high on the hogs with brainless girlfriends
ignoring their first wives who are slaving over the kids (they made a
move about that and the vindictive wives revenge dreams coming true,
called the "First Wives Club") From that perspective, the public was
given two sides, on one, the shameless men and their new girlfriends,
and on the other, the mother and their child. It was easy to pick sides
then.
Then we have the republican revolution of the early 90s. Republicans
railed about welfare mothers sitting around collecting the welfare check
while never going out and getting a job. Between the Republicans, a
party of bad ideas, and a president of the Democratic party, a party of
no ideas, it was easy to see where this compromise would end. The
welfare mothers were still at home, but now they were collecting child
support checks from the husband instead of the government. And of
course, because the Republicans love to tell a person to help themselves ...
|
| Show full article (2.14Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
