Just heard that woman has approached man's lawyer to get court's order
against her to take infant out of Canada (Ontario?) vacated, in return
for her to withdraw her complaint to police against him.
Last I heard woman had moved to her relations in Vancouver. She is now
telling that it was child care people who forced her to cook up the
police complaint under threat of removing infant from her.
One thing is certain woman having failed to get in writing from the man
a confession of assult that he did not commit made police complaint and
that too after the man obtained court order against him.
Still man has been put in jail, which is rather strange for any legal
system.

This is a tragedy of Indians who are several generations educated high
up in social ladder, and from what I know about this case relatively
settled Indians in the West are unwilling to come to grips with the
ills of "educated" Indians.

On 25 Dec 2006, 08:41, josh...@gmail.com wrote:

"Relayer" aol.com> wrote in message
news:1169259789.262803.113680@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...

"Relayer" wrote

.....................................................

There is a quote from a German economist in the 19th century that went
to the effect of "Why do we keep repeating the truth again and again?
Because the liars keep lying again and again." I am starting to feel
tha way with these deadbeat lists.

http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070117/NEWS/70117061

I read your article today ("Wanted poster targets new group of deadbeat
dads") and I wish to congratulate you and the Deleware Division of Child
Support Enforcement for enforcing the fact that the CSE...

On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:56:28 GMT, "G" earthlink.com> wrote:

"DB" sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Jfirh.67915$wP1.56442@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...

I would be interested to see any reliable information on the issue of
whether the knowledge of how men are treated in divorces has filtered back
to younger never-married men, and made them reluctant to run the risk of
getting married. This news story focuses on women. It fudges the issue of
whether they are unmarried because they don't WANT to marry, or because no
man has any interest in marrying them.

In the wider context, it seems to me that the breakdown of the family
has VERY serious consequences for Western countries in matters such as crime
rates and educational standards. Falling birth rates (relative to, say,
Moslems in Western countries and in Moslem countries) also are contributing
to the decline of Western countries.

http://www.parkrapidsenterprise.com/articles/index.cfm?id=7459&forumcomm_check_return&freebie_check&CFID...

you mean to say that CSEAs will lie to a person by omission in order to
get a fatter paycheck? Why they're government workers, why would they
lie to the people they are supposed to serve? Next thing you will be
telling me is that Congressmen are abusing pages, or immigration
officials will be padding their already thick salaries with bribes to
let illegals into this country.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16660846/

So what is the message here, kiddies? Why, quite simple: if you want to
lobby a congressman, make sure your a good lay.

"neenna66" wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1168931729.874106.304100@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

What you said was you do not take the child as an exemption. Tax exemptions
and tax filing status are two separate things with different IRS definitions
for when and how they apply. No state court divorce decree can override
federal tax law. If you gave up the child exemption for some reason you can
still file head of household.
I

CS has nothing to do with the NCP's expenses. It doesn't matter what he
claims as his expenses. His income is the only real factor used for
determining CS awards.

"neenna66" wmconnect.com> wrote in message
news:1168930018.102696.275750@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...