|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DTCDTC Date: Sep 20, 2007 16:00
Oxford wrote:
> if you live in a poor area, just MOVE... there is no reason for you to
> lower your standard of life just to be out of range of free WiFi
> service...
I *SALE* WiFi service, as in "its not free".
My biggest client bases are in $300,000 to $500,000 housing developments.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Todd AllcockTodd Allcock Date: Sep 20, 2007 15:58
At 20 Sep 2007 18:19:28 -0400 kdt wrote:
> You need a soldering iron to connect a battery pack to the dock
> connector?
Oh, you mean one of those stupid external battery extenders! Great
idea, I'll snap it in my Utility Belt between the Bat-Rope and the
Bat-Grappling-hook...
--
"I don't need my cell phone to play video games or take pictures
or double as a Walkie-Talkie; I just need it to work. Thanks for
all the bells and whistles, but I could communicate better with
ACTUAL bells and whistles." -Bill Maher 9/25/2003
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: DTCDTC Date: Sep 20, 2007 16:05
Oxford wrote:
> An article written by cell phone companies, how interesting!
How did you come to that conclusion? I didn't see any reference to any
cellphone companies.
Are you imagining things or making up this crap as you go along?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: LarryLarry Date: Sep 20, 2007 16:10
"Giganews" nomore.damn.spam.nessnet.com> wrote in
news:r7ydncfvMM0SC2_bnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@giganews.com:
> Oxford, Your 'vision' of WiFi is about as wrong as one can be....
>
>
I found a wifi dead spot near here in a burger joint, today. First time I
didn't have Skype on the Netgear Skype phone in some time....
Larry
--
Search youtube for "Depleted Uranium"
The ultimate dirty bomb......
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DTCDTC Date: Sep 20, 2007 16:04
> DUh - AT&T has 10,000 WiFi Hot Spots in the United States.
> Doesn't sound like they've abandoned it.
Apples to oranges.
AT&T, err...at&t, charges for their service. Its not free.
AT&T offers hotspots, not ubiquitous coverage.
AT&T limits what you can do. You can't run servers,, or webcams, etc.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ScottScott Date: Sep 20, 2007 16:13
> "Giganews" nomore.damn.spam.nessnet.com> wrote:
>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ScottScott Date: Sep 20, 2007 16:20
> It's not cities stepping away, it's they're contractor Earthlink now
> teetering on the brink of bankruptcy that can't afford to meet its
> committments to build WiFi systems for these cities.
>
>
Wrong- it is the cities stepping away. Nice try, paranoid troll.
City holds out for
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ScottScott Date: Sep 20, 2007 16:34
"BruceR" NOgmailSPAM.com> wrote in news:46f222b9$0$28834
$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
>
>
> Oxford wrote:
>> "IMHO IIRC" wrote:
>>
>>>> Ah, so the flaw is thinking that a thousand times more WiFi towers
>>>> is less expensive to deploy than cell towers.
>>>
>>...
|
| Show full article (1.41Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bob FryBob Fry Date: Sep 20, 2007 17:44
"Arguing on Usenet is like running a race in the Special Olympics:
even if you win, you're still retarded."
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: kdtkdt Date: Sep 20, 2007 20:14
> At 20 Sep 2007 18:19:28 -0400 kdt wrote:
>
>> You need a soldering iron to connect a battery pack to the dock
>> connector?
>
>
> Oh, you mean one of those stupid external battery extenders! Great
> idea, I'll snap it in my Utility Belt between the Bat-Rope and the
> Bat-Grappling-hook...
>
>
But you are already carrying around two or three batteries according to you
so what's the difference?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
