> In article comcast.com>,
> "BruceR" SPAMwhoever.com> wrote:
>

>> Thank you for that statement. It proves positively that you know
>> nothing
>> about corporate security. Telling a guard that "it's disabled in
>> software" will do nothing. If there is a lens on the device, whether
>> "burnished with a Dremel" or "disabled in software," (your
>> suggestions -
>> not Apple's) you will not carry it past the guard station. That's
>> like
>> telling a TSA agent that the gun you're carrying doesn't have a
>> firing
>> pin. And lest you think that the market for non-camera phones id
>> limited
>> to a couple hundred thousand, you again prove that you know little,
>> if
>> anything, about corporate security that affects MILLIONS of
>> employees.
>>
>> Oxford, I have one question for you for which I already know you will
>> give a non-responsive answer: In light of the fact that absolutely no
>> one - not one single post - on any of the many NG's you have posted
>> to
>> has agreed with anything you have to say why do you continue to spout
>> such nonsense? Are you being paid to do this? Do you get off on the
>> abuse? The IPhone is designed for fanbois just like you - be happy,
>> feel
>> superior to us, and enjoy your new toy du jour. The rest of us
>> luddites
>> will just continue to toil away in the darkness with products we've
>> found to meet our own unique needs.
>>
>> When the first iPhone came out you told us that it was "game over"
>> and
>> all the other carriers would disappear as well as all the other cell
>> phone makers. That hasn't happened yet and is not about to anytime
>> soon. You were wrong then and nothing has changed.

>
> someday, you'll catch up to the life i live, until then... i can only
> laugh at your ignorance surrounding cameras in the enterprise. the
> iphone is the most significant phone development since electronic
> telephone switching happened in the mid 1960's.
>
> now the world has its first successful unix cell phone, and it's
> upsetting Verizon and others to extreme levels. Ivan Seidenberg of
> Verizon how thinks the success of the iPhone is a "conspiracy" and
> "hates Steve Jobs".
>
> too funny, that's a company that had a chance to have the greatest
> electronic device of this generation and his company failed to win
> Apple's interest. that will perhaps go down as one of the biggest
> blunders of american business when this is all over. Verizon and
> others
> are dead in the water unless they can win the iPhone.
>
> it's going to get really interesting staring in 6 days! see ya on the
> other side!