> Thank you for that statement. It proves positively that you know nothing
> about corporate security. Telling a guard that "it's disabled in
> software" will do nothing. If there is a lens on the device, whether
> "burnished with a Dremel" or "disabled in software," (your suggestions -
> not Apple's) you will not carry it past the guard station. That's like
> telling a TSA agent that the gun you're carrying doesn't have a firing
> pin. And lest you think that the market for non-camera phones id limited
> to a couple hundred thousand, you again prove that you know little, if
> anything, about corporate security that affects MILLIONS of employees.
>
> Oxford, I have one question for you for which I already know you will
> give a non-responsive answer: In light of the fact that absolutely no
> one - not one single post - on any of the many NG's you have posted to
> has agreed with anything you have to say why do you continue to spout
> such nonsense? Are you being paid to do this? Do you get off on the
> abuse? The IPhone is designed for fanbois just like you - be happy, feel
> superior to us, and enjoy your new toy du jour. The rest of us luddites
> will just continue to toil away in the darkness with products we've
> found to meet our own unique needs.
>
> When the first iPhone came out you told us that it was "game over" and
> all the other carriers would disappear as well as all the other cell
> phone makers. That hasn't happened yet and is not about to anytime
> soon. You were wrong then and nothing has changed.