|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: OneTwoThreeOneTwoThree Date: May 10, 2008 18:51
In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives designed
to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
issue.
Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
One goes a step further, and throws rent control into the mix, making it
unconstitutional (in California only) to impose rent control.
I'll have to admit, I'm ambivalent on this one. As one who rented for many
years, I have an innate and inborn resentment towards greedy landlords who
fail to maintain their property with any regularity or alacrity yet never
fail to raise rents as often as possible.
On the other hand, what is rent control but government telling a property
owner what he can and cannot do with his property?
|
| Show full article (1.61Kb) |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
|
Author: Tracey12Tracey12 Date: May 11, 2008 12:01
On May 10, 8:51 pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:
> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>
> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>
> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives designed
> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
> issue.
>
> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
> private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
>
> One goes a step further, and throws rent control into the mix, making it
> unconstitutional (in California only) to impose rent control.
>
> I'll have to admit, I'm ambivalent on this one. As one who rented for many ...
|
| Show full article (1.96Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: California PoppyCalifornia Poppy Date: May 11, 2008 15:04
On May 10, 6:51�pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:
> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>
> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>
> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives designed
> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
> issue.
>
> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
> private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
>
> One goes a step further, and throws rent control into the mix, making it
> unconstitutional (in California only) to impose rent control.
>
> I'll have to admit, I'm ambivalent on this one. As one who rented for many ...
|
| Show full article (1.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: WayneWayne Date: May 11, 2008 16:39
"California Poppy" aol.com> wrote in message
news:d21a3fad-fe11-45f2-a5e7-fb5e9b53c672@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On May 10, 6:51?pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>
> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>
> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives
> designed
> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
> issue.
>
> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
> private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
>
> One goes a step further, and throws rent control into the mix, making it ...
|
| Show full article (2.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: OneTwoThreeOneTwoThree Date: May 14, 2008 09:29
"California Poppy" aol.com> wrote in message
news:d21a3fad-fe11-45f2-a5e7-fb5e9b53c672@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On May 10, 6:51?pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>
> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>
> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives
> designed
> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
> issue.
>
> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
> private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
>
> One goes a step further, and throws rent control into the mix, making it ...
|
| Show full article (2.12Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: jeniusjenius Date: May 15, 2008 04:18
On May 10, 9:51Â pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:
> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>
> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>
> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives designed
> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
> issue.
>
> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
> private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
>
> One goes a step further, and throws rent control into the mix, making it
> unconstitutional (in California only) to impose rent control.
>
> I'll have to admit, I'm ambivalent on this one. As one who rented for many ...
|
| Show full article (1.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: George GrapmanGeorge Grapman Date: May 15, 2008 07:04
jenius wrote:
> On May 10, 9:51 pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:
>> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
>> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
>> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
>> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>>
>> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
>> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>>
>> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives designed
>> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
>> issue.
>>
>> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
>> private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
>>
>> One goes a step further, and throws rent control into the mix, making it
>> unconstitutional (in California only) to impose rent control.
>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: George GrapmanGeorge Grapman Date: May 15, 2008 08:27
Rudy Canoza wrote:
> jenius wrote:
>> On May 10, 9:51 pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:
>>> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
>>> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private
>>> property
>>> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature
>>> refused
>>> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>>>
>>> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning
>>> we can
>>> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>>>
>>> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives
>>> designed
>>> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize ...
|
| Show full article (2.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: George GrapmanGeorge Grapman Date: May 15, 2008 08:45
Rudy Canoza wrote:
> George Grapman wrote:
>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> jenius wrote:
>>>> On May 10, 9:51 pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:
>>>>> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
>>>>> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private
>>>>> property
>>>>> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature
>>>>> refused
>>>>> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>>>>>
>>>>> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning
>>>>> we can
>>>>> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>>>>>
>>>>> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives
>>>>> designed
>>>>> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent
>>>>> domain ...
|
| Show full article (3.21Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Michael EjercitoMichael Ejercito Date: May 15, 2008 14:12
On May 15, 4:18 am, jenius gmail.com> wrote:> On May 10, 9:51 pm, "OneTwoThree" wrote:
>
>
>
>> In response to the Supreme Court decision that supported the rights of
>> government to use the process of eminent domain to seize private property
>> and turn it over to developers, the leftist California legislature refused
>> to do anything to clarify or condemn this decision
>
>> Fortunately, we in California have the right of initiative, meaning we can
>> do what our legislature is to cowardly or corrupt to do themselves.
>
>> This upcoming election, we are being presented with two initiatives designed
>> to address this cowardly Supreme Court.and their idiotic eminent domain
>> issue.
>
>> Both propositions on our ballot limit the ability of government to seize
>> private property in order to turn it over to private developers.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.32Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
