Re: A Supreme Court Nominee With No Judicial Experience Requires Extreme Scrutiny
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.california only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: A Supreme Court Nominee With No Judicial Experience Requires Extreme Scrutiny         

Group: alt.california · Group Profile
Author: Tim Crowley
Date: May 13, 2010 23:59

On May 13, 2:53 pm, David Hartung wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 04:25 PM, Tim Crowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On May 13, 1:05 pm, David Hartung  wrote:
>>> On 05/13/2010 01:51 PM, Tim Crowley wrote:
>
>>>> On May 13, 10:46 am, David Hartung    wrote:
>>>>> On 05/13/2010 12:32 PM, Tim Crowley wrote:
>
>>>>>> On May 13, 10:28 am, "15.1 Million Unemployed in Bummah's Economy"
>>>>>> Whitehouse.org>      wrote:
>>>>>>> No a Republican did not say that , Hussein NObama  did. Suck on it  RATS!
>
>>>>>>> Obama Flashback: A Supreme Court Nominee With No Judicial Experience
>>>>>>> Requires Extreme Scrutiny
>
>
>>>>>> She's getting scrutiny, she will be confirmed and you can continue to
>>>>>> scream in impotent pain to the amusement of all.
>
>>>>> She probably will be confirmed, unless the Republicans stick together
>>>>> and block the confirmation.
>
>>>> yawn. you already lost.
>
>>>>> You did not address the fact that Ms Kagan has no experience, and as
>>>>> such she needs additional scrutiny. Would you care to do so now?
>
>>>> Sure I did.  She will get the scrutiny and she will be confirmed.
>
>>> If the current Congress continues as they have, there will be little or
>>> no scrutiny,
>
>> There is already massive scrutiny and she will have hearings. Why do
>> you lied, Hartung? That strategy has never worked for you before, but
>> you can't stop yourself.
>
> Has there?

Yes, there has.

fuck. you're dumb.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!