Re: A Supreme Court Nominee With No Judicial Experience Requires Extreme Scrutiny
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.california only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: A Supreme Court Nominee With No Judicial Experience Requires Extreme Scrutiny         

Group: alt.california · Group Profile
Author: Tim Crowley
Date: May 13, 2010 23:28

On May 13, 1:05 pm, David Hartung wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 01:51 PM, Tim Crowley wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On May 13, 10:46 am, David Hartung  wrote:
>>> On 05/13/2010 12:32 PM, Tim Crowley wrote:
>
>>>> On May 13, 10:28 am, "15.1 Million Unemployed in Bummah's Economy"
>>>> Whitehouse.org>    wrote:
>>>>> No a Republican did not say that , Hussein NObama  did. Suck on it  RATS!
>
>>>>> Obama Flashback: A Supreme Court Nominee With No Judicial Experience
>>>>> Requires Extreme Scrutiny
>
>
>>>> She's getting scrutiny, she will be confirmed and you can continue to
>>>> scream in impotent pain to the amusement of all.
>
>>> She probably will be confirmed, unless the Republicans stick together
>>> and block the confirmation.
>
>> yawn. you already lost.
>
>>> You did not address the fact that Ms Kagan has no experience, and as
>>> such she needs additional scrutiny. Would you care to do so now?
>
>> Sure I did.  She will get the scrutiny and she will be confirmed.
>
> If the current Congress continues as they have, there will be little or
> no scrutiny,

There is already massive scrutiny and she will have hearings. Why do
you lied, Hartung? That strategy has never worked for you before, but
you can't stop yourself.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!