|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: chuckcarchuckcar
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:27
Apparently a fake story, but good for a laugh anyways.
Johnstown, PA (GlossyNews) - Animal Rights Activists protest
Leather-wearing at a biker rally
Local and state police scoured the hills outside rural Johnstown,
Pennsylvania, after reports of three animal rights activists missing
after attempting to protest the wearing of leather at a large motorcycle...
|
| Show full article (3.38Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: BuZZardBuZZard
Date: May 12, 2010 04:10
"family" bresnan.net> wrote in message
news:yoydnbQnaO0TbnTWnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@bresnan.com...> Froggers are both liars and cowards,
> why else would they ever need to steal someone else identity
> to spread their vile propaganda?
>
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: needlesneedles
Date: Jan 29, 2010 02:23
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8484823.stm
Here are the specs.
Height:9.56 inches (242.8 mm)
Width:7.47 inches (189.7 mm)
Depth:0.5 inch (13.4 mm)
Weight:1.5 pounds (0.68 kg) Wi-Fi model;
1.6 pounds (0.73 kg) Wi-Fi + 3G model
You can find out more here.
http://tinyurl.com/yd29c9j
I am not a person who owns much in the way of electronics... but I am
absolutely knocked out by this device... wow. I cut out a piece of paper to
the exact screen size and this size totally works for me. (I don't like the
smallish print in most paperbacks anyway...and prefer hardcover size pages.)
Thought I'd never want an e-book reader, but the size and back-lit clarity
make it very appealing to me. And it appears to do everything else I'd want
a computer to do. Love the photo album feature, the email, etc
I definitely wants one, maybe.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: evulevul
Date: Jan 28, 2010 23:15
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.buzzard.rules.]
On 2010-01-27, fanghorn wrote:
> "family" bresnan.net> wrote in
> news:JcCdndM-NIcSCv3WnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@bresnan.com:
>> It's a shitty job, but somebody had to do it.
>
Really? Can your jokes get any older?
--
|
| Show full article (0.83Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter
Date: Jan 28, 2010 21:58
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:35:09 GMT, Dustin Cook
gmail.com> wrote:
>Nah, what is pathetic is the idea that you could be provoked into a fist
>fight with words only. When you or anyone else switches from words to
>your fist or something else, thats when it ends; I tell you I have a
>piece and then I pull it. At that point, whether you live or not really
>is your decision.
Too much of a pussy to stand on your own, eh? Gotta hide behind a
weapon? LOL, that's sort of like talking big behind your keyboard
whilst never posting yer home address, innt? ^__^
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.uncensored-inter.net
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"Never do to anyone online what you wouldn't want done to yourself."
"Freedom, true freedom, is nothing more than intellectual advantage over others."
|
| Show full article (3.09Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter
Date: Jan 28, 2010 21:55
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:50:48 GMT, Dustin Cook
gmail.com> wrote:
>I freely run my mouth. I carry a pistol too tho. So raise that fist big
>boy, My glock says you'll drop it quick enough and be a nice little
>bitch. Or moving target practice. I don't really care which.
So then you're a pussy, eh? Well, I guess we already knew that, what
with how you hide behind a keyboard, never posting your IRL identity
and all. LOL
As pussy as you sound...I doubt you even know how to handle a gun.
Furthermore...if you tried that trick on me...I'd make you shoot
yourself in the head with your own gun by the time you could even
think of how to pull that little pussy trigger.
Don't ever pull a gun unless you actually plan to use it...I mean
*RIGHT THEN*. The second you pull it should be the exact same second
you pull the trigger...if it's not...yer dead. *shrugs*
|
| Show full article (4.24Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: familyfamily
Date: Jan 28, 2010 19:59
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8484823.stm
It's a *TWEENY* somewhere between an iPod and a laptop in size.
It is about the size of an average paperback book, or folded newspaper.
Or a small magazine or a DVD cassette case.
If only because not everyone has 20/20 vision.
It will fit inside an average size handbag or backpack quite easily.
Or those cargo pant pockets so beloved by so many people.
We could go on, but we hope you get the message!
*Eat your heart out Bill Gates*
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: BaalBaal
Date: Dec 26, 2008 14:31
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
vinny@work wrote in alt.buzzard.rules on December 17, 2008 03:08 in
Message-ID: solani.org>:
[snip]
> But... For digitally signed posts to be effective, folks would need
> to know in advance the key.
That doesn't pose a problem. Remember, the public key is needed to /verify/
the signature, while the private key is required to /make/ the signature.
A PGP public key can be posted to a keyserver, and one can include an URL
where the key can be downloaded from. I do this all the time in my .sig
block:
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1E92C0E8
PGP Key Fingerprint: 40E4 E9BB D084 22D5 3DE9 66B8 08E3 638C 1E92 C0E8
> Besides...anything can be forged.
Nonsense. The entire point behind digital signatures is to make it extremely
difficult, if not impossible to alter a document with an attached signature.
If even a single /bit/ in a signed message changes, the signature will show
as invalid.
|
| Show full article (3.68Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: BaalBaal
Date: Dec 26, 2008 13:15
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
pj wrote in alt.buzzard.rules on December 16, 2008 16:08 in Message-ID:
4ax.com>:
[snip]
> I'd seriously urge you to look at the pgp route - then you can put a
> signature at the bottom of your posts saying "All genuine fanghorn
> posts are signed with my key". The reader, after installing the
> relevant software (available for most newsreaders), can then
> immediately check to see if it is a post from you.
Precisely. That is what I've been doing for over a dozen years now.
> PLUS - there's no danger that your doppelganger will figure a way
> around a PGP signature.
Well, that's a given--it is believed by many that the algorithms employed
are secure against virtually all comers.
|
| Show full article (2.80Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
