> On Mar 7, 1:38 pm, "Used To Be Your Bellman" fakeisp.com>
> wrote:
>

>>Oh good grief, yet another arrogant ignorant dickhead.
>>
>>When oh when etc. etc. etc.
>>
>>

> DontFeedTroll@gmail.com wrote:
>

>> On Mar 7, 1:38 pm, "Used To Be Your Bellman" fakeisp.com>
>> wrote:
>>

>>> Oh good grief, yet another arrogant ignorant dickhead.
>>>
>>> When oh when etc. etc. etc.
>>>
>>> earthlink.net> wrote in
>>> messagenews:465a8c2b-1c58-450e-bde1-3977d5c5b864@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 7, 2:22 pm, Keynes earthlinkspam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>

>>>> Evidently, Mr.Dogshit, you think the more you're
>>>> hated the wiser you must be. And so you are as
>>>> hateful as possible, just to fulfill the prophesy. ...

> DontFeedTroll@gmail.com wrote:
>

>> On Mar 7, 7:22 am, Robert Epstein verizon.net> wrote:
>>

>>> ancientbuddh...@earthlink.net wrote:
>>>

>>>> your dogshit post, in detail,.... is demonic in that it praises
>>>> existential objectification, ie CONCENTRATION in and upon the mara-
>>>> khandhas.

>>>

>>>> however, that you fail to realize this obvious fact only further
>>>> proves you have shit for brains and should no longer comment upon
>>>> buddhism, metaphysics, nor the
>>>> methodology of disobjectification ( = samadhi/ assimilation).

>>>

>>>> expert in earlist buddhism, A Pali translator, Author of several
>>>> books, and lecturer upon same.

>>>

>>>> veritas lux mea. ...

> Robert Epstein wrote:
>

>> DontFeedTroll@gmail.com wrote:
>>

>>> On Mar 7, 1:38 pm, "Used To Be Your Bellman" fakeisp.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Oh good grief, yet another arrogant ignorant dickhead...

> On Mar 7, 4:46 pm, "Ned" ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>

>> Oh nonsense. The 'no self' (anatman) doctrine is fundamental
>> to all of Buddhism. It is SO fundamental that it is ensconced
>> in the "three marks" of Buddhism (which are 'dukkha' - suffering,
>> 'annica' - impermanence, and 'anatman' - no-self).

>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Advaita Vedanta uses the term Anatman (Pali: anatta) in the exact
> same
> fashion as does Buddhist doctrine
> Which begs the question, why is 'Buddhism' so demonically ignorant as
> to presume that the usage of the term anatman implies a denial of
> the
> Atman
>
> #1. "Atma-anatma vivekah kartavyo bandha nuktaye"-"The wiseman should
> discriminate between the Atman and the non-Atman (anatman) in order ...

> can you describe this correct path in a nutshell?
>
> robert

>> atta hi attano nathi,

>

>> attasarana anannasarana

>

>> atta hi paramo piya.

>

>> you lose, son

>
> the Buddha said this?
> which sutta is the above quoted from, please?
> I would like to read the original.
>
> robert

> jfez...@googlemail.com wrote:

>> On Mar 7, 12:52 pm, ancientbuddh...@earthlink.net wrote:

>

>>>On Mar 7, 3:44 pm, jfez...@googlemail.com wrote:

>

>>>>Throw away all your gathered mental knowledge of dharma and what do
>>>>you have to 'win' with?- Hide quoted text -

>

>>>_____________________________

>

>>>win ehh???

>

>>>------------"he is called WINNER! HERO! He is supremely free
>>>(suvimutta), having transcended (nissarana) the world by prowress of
>>>his wisdom. Uddamsoto (upstreamer), flood-crossed"- Gotama Buddha-----
>>>Majjhima 2

>

>>>"one thing only do i teach, liberation won by wisdom
>>>(pannavimutta)"--------Gotama..........common passage. ...

> On Mar 7, 7:16 pm, Robert Epstein verizon.net> wrote:
>

>> can you describe this correct path in a nutshell?
>>
>> robert

> ************************************
>
> I wrote the answer to same on> www.attan.com/originalsamadhi.html
>
> According to webhits, and emails i recieve on same, it is a very
> popular and highly beloved link about the correct
> methodology. ............
>
> I even recieved $1000.00 via paypal from a Doctor in Canada who so
> loved the page, and talk about same on the phone.