> I need to set up a file encryption system, such that it can be accessed
> from three different computers, by four or five different people. We're
> currently looking at something called WinPG, which is the Winders
> version of GNUpg, which is the GNU version of PGP. This looks like it's
> going to involve lots of passing keys around and remembering of
> passphrases.
>
> Anybody got any better/easier but still secure suggestions?
>
> Thanks, y'all.
>
> DT

>
> Paranoia strikes deep, Don. ;-) My new supervisor is getting really
> weird about "secure" passwords, no passwords written down, nothing
> stored on a removable/loseable/stealable device. I've been dinged for
> using a password like "Rowdy72" for my email. Is anybody else *really*
> gonna be able to figure out our old dog's name and when he died? Yeah,
> a 'bot could run through every English word and number combination, but
> can't the same 'bot run through every random letter/number combination?
>
> DT

> I need to set up a file encryption system, such that it can be accessed
> from three different computers, by four or five different people. We're
> currently looking at something called WinPG, which is the Winders
> version of GNUpg, which is the GNU version of PGP. This looks like it's
> going to involve lots of passing keys around and remembering of
> passphrases.
>
> Anybody got any better/easier but still secure suggestions?
>
> Thanks, y'all.
>
> DT

> dt wrote:

>> I need to set up a file encryption system, such that it can be accessed
>> from three different computers, by four or five different people. We're
>> currently looking at something called WinPG, which is the Winders version
>> of GNUpg, which is the GNU version of PGP. This looks like it's going to
>> involve lots of passing keys around and remembering of passphrases.
>>
>> Anybody got any better/easier but still secure suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks, y'all.
>>
>> DT

>
> I have a vision of your future. I see you buying five copies of PGP
> Desktop.
>
> Best wishes
> Kirsten ...

>
>dt wrote:

>> I need to set up a file encryption system, such that it can be accessed
>> from three different computers, by four or five different people. We're
>> currently looking at something called WinPG, which is the Winders
>> version of GNUpg, which is the GNU version of PGP. This looks like it's
>> going to involve lots of passing keys around and remembering of
>> passphrases.
>>
>> Anybody got any better/easier but still secure suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks, y'all.
>>
>> DT

>
>Do you think that each user could have a flash drive that they would
>keep with them that would keep all their keys and passphrases? They
>could use them like physical keys in the computers' USB ports.

>
>Don Shepherd wrote:
>

>> dt wrote:
>>

>>> I need to set up a file encryption system, such that it can be
>>> accessed from three different computers, by four or five different
>>> people. We're currently looking at something called WinPG, which is
>>> the Winders version of GNUpg, which is the GNU version of PGP. This
>>> looks like it's going to involve lots of passing keys around and
>>> remembering of passphrases.
>>>
>>> Anybody got any better/easier but still secure suggestions?
>>>
>>> Thanks, y'all.
>>>
>>> DT

>>
>> ...

>Don Shepherd wrote:
>

>> dt wrote:
>>

>>>
>>> Paranoia strikes deep, Don. ;-) My new supervisor is getting really
>>> weird about "secure" passwords, no passwords written down, nothing
>>> stored...