|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: WolfWolf
Date: Jan 14, 2007 14:24
"T-Mac" invalid.net> wrote in message
news:7ivkq2155s0v05kn2so2lhm025bji4nn0n@4ax.com...> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:31:13 -0500, BTR1701 ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
>>>In article <1a8iq2htium11berkf1ak8dg9c7kveeplt@ 4ax.com>,
>> T-Mac invalid.net> wrote:>
>>>>Profit or lack thereof is irrelevant to whether a copyright is
>>>>violated.
>>>>The only time profit becomes as issue is in determining whether the
>>>>breach is civil or criminal in nature.
>>>
>>> I think that this would also be a special case considering the
>>> original work that this is derived from is not the work of Stephen
>>> King.
>>
>>The difference is that King secures permission from everyone whose
>>copyrighted works he may incorporate into his own.
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.90Kb) |
|
| |
3 Comments |
|
|
Author: Bev VincentBev Vincent
Date: Jan 14, 2007 09:34
> Personally speaking, I think Bev would be 'horrified' to think that anyone
> thought of this as *his* NG.
>
> But then, that too is only opinion..... Based on my all-too-short meeting
> with the man...
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: CovenantCovenant
Date: Jan 14, 2007 08:52
Personally speaking, I think Bev would be 'horrified' to think that anyone
thought of this as *his* NG.
But then, that too is only opinion..... Based on my all-too-short meeting
with the man...
--
Covenant
A Man With Far Too Much Time On His Hands
"BTR1701" ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:btr1702-9DBF09.18311313012007@news.giganews.com...> In article <1a8iq2htium11berkf1ak8dg9c7kveeplt@ 4ax.com>,
> T-Mac invalid.net> wrote...
|
| Show full article (2.57Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: CovenantCovenant
Date: Jan 14, 2007 08:49
>
> Covenant wrote:
>> I think my problem with it is the King trademarks (The odd turns of
>> phrase,
>> "bool", "bad-gunky" etc) seem forced into this one.
>> And the repetition is awful.
>>
>> Yet I'm still reading it!
>>
>> (Think it's better than Cell)
>>
>
> And if one did make up those terms as a child,
> heh- well, wouldn't they be exactly that, childish and simple?
YEaaahhh...
Except his DAD made them up.
|
| Show full article (0.87Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: BTR1701BTR1701
Date: Jan 13, 2007 15:31
In article <1a8iq2htium11berkf1ak8dg9c7kveeplt@ 4ax.com>,
T-Mac invalid.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:43:43 -0500, BTR1701 ix.netcom.com>
> wrote:
> >>In article fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
>> "Covenant" blueyonder.co...
|
| Show full article (2.13Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ChipChip
Date: Jan 13, 2007 09:47
"Wolf" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45a90f93$0$16691$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...> "T-Mac" invalid.net> wrote in message
> news:k6dhq29irvprpm1043qcehs4tjugdjb33a@4ax.com...>>
>> While things seem a little quiet in here I have a story I would like
>> to tell you.
>>
>> The title of the story is "Palaver" It is a Tower story.
>>
>> This story is an original. It is one of mine so there is no copyright
>> infringement in my posting it even though the story is copywritten.
>> The story is unpublishable but it IS my story.
>>
>> The story comes in Ten parts and has an Epilogue.
>>
>> It is quite a long story at 140 pages and 49,000 some odd words. I
>> guess it is really more of a novella.
>>
>> So I plan to post it in ten parts and the epilogue over several days. ...
|
| Show full article (1.25Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: BTR1701BTR1701
Date: Jan 13, 2007 09:43
In article fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
"Covenant" blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> It's Fan-Fiction, and being posted online there is no profit being made.
> No copyright being breached.
Actually, fan-fiction *does* breach copyright. It's a derivative work,
by definition. However, most copyright holders rarely bother with trying
to stop it.
Profit or lack thereof is irrelevant to whether a copyright is violated.
The only time profit becomes as issue is in determining whether the
breach is civil or criminal in nature.
|
| |
|
6 Comments |
|
|
|
|
