> Hey
>
> does anybody know about '"100 Days To Better Health, Good Sex & Long
> Life: A guide to Taoist Yoga & Chi Kung by Eric Yudelove"
>
> I was wondering if one knows exactly how Eric Yudelove explained the
> concept of Chi. If you do know what he was talking about please
> explain to me. Thank you.
>

> But in some ways the chi is a mystical concept. As a result, words
> themselves cannot express the essential nature of chi.

>>>>>>> But in some ways the chi is a mystical concept. As a result,
>>>>>>> words themselves cannot express the essential nature of chi.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure they can. Bunk, hokum, malarkey, horse hockey...

> KStahl wrote:
>
>

>>>>>>>>But in some ways the chi is a mystical concept. As a result,
>>>>>>>>words themselves cannot express the essential nature of chi.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sure they can. Bunk, hokum...

> That's fine. You can waste it any way you please - be my guest, it is
> your life after all. But you may have to do it again and again until
> you finally consider that existentialism may not be the best path.

> Theistic fantasy? How did that creep in? At no point did I start
> talking about some old guy with a white beard that is sometimes
> represented by Morgan Freeman. In fact, religion is generally a
> fruitless pursuit. All it gets a person is a set of rules and the
> requirement to donate money to someone who will use it for personal
> gain.

>> The biggest problem for most people is that the whole area of
>> religious nonsense is so drilled into them from the moment they can
>> start learning that they automatically equate anything that
>> metaphysical to religion. But divorced from religious nonsense, a
>> person can live an experiential life and maybe even try to be "good
>> for goodness sake". After all, what evidence do you have that the
>> akashic records do not exist and that it might be possible to tap
>> into that resource?

>
> Akashic records? Good gods, I have no fucking idea what you're going
> on about. I have no more evidence about their non-existence than I do
> for Joe Smith golden tablets.

> KStahl wrote:
>
>

>>That's fine. You can waste it any way you please - be my guest, it is
>>your life after all. But you may have to do it again and again until
>>you finally consider that existentialism may not be the best path.

>
>
> LOL...what is your thinking? That this is all just another Groundhog Day?
>
>

>>Theistic fantasy? How did that creep in? At no point did I start
>>talking about some old guy with a white beard that is sometimes
>>represented by Morgan Freeman. In fact, religion is generally a
>>fruitless pursuit. All it gets a person is a set of rules and the
>>requirement to donate money to someone who will use it for personal
>>gain.

>
> ...

> Geoff wrote:
>
>

>>>The biggest problem for most people is that the whole area of
>>>religious nonsense is so drilled into them from the moment they can
>>>start learning that they automatically equate...

> You are scoffing at something you don't really understand and the
> reason you don't understand is because you don't feel the need to
> inquire into such things.

> So, just forget about the whole thing. Forget I even mentioned it. Go
> about your life and do what you will. But for myself, I think I'll
> keep trying to sort it all out so that in my next lifetime maybe I'll
> start paying attention a bit sooner.