| Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.athiesm · Group Profile
Author: Dr. HouseDr. House Date: Jun 27, 2008 15:43
On Jun 27, 2:34Â pm, roym...@ gmail.com wrote:
[...] >> Well, there really isn't any "technical stuff" on the creationists'
>> side. Just a bunch of pseudoscientific double-talk designed to confuse
>> the issue.
>
> Well, thanks for that. Â I'ld like to think that it's sometimes helpful
> to distinguish people at the folk level for being less informed than
> those up to speed in their movement.
>
> So, given that there are credible scientists amongst the creationists,
> do we know if any of their papers been published in Nature?
What credible scientists would that be? ID does not use the
scientific method. When someone tries to get non-science published as
science that eliminates them from being credible scientists.
Hypothesis: Our universe is less than 7,000 years old.
Test: If our hypothesis were true then no star would have existed over
7,000 years ago.
Result: We have found that some stars existed 15,000,000,000 years
ago.
Non-scientific conclusion: Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.
Obviously our test was wrong.
House
Because some of the . . . er . . . more delicate individuals were
frightened by the Jayne Cobb reference. And no, I'm not a real Doctor
but Hugh Laurie plays one on TV. ;-)
| 
