On Jun 27, 5:01Â am, Pastor Dave
_gmail.com> wrote:
[...]> The problem with evolutionists, is their straw men and
> red herrings,
You have demonstrated that you do no understand what these terms mean.
> . . . all designed to avoid providing the supposed
> "mountains of evidence" for macroevolution,
Evidence for macro was provided. Each time you denied or
rationalized.
I mentioned the furry, egg-laying platypus and your response was "That
is a claim, not proof! You idiot evolutionists seem to think that if
you say something, that means it has been proved to the world!"
Yet when a scientist does take the time to do a proper research study
and actually does prove something you treat them like they are part of
the Illuminati and trying to convert every Christian to a different
religion.
When I mentioned the genetic research on recessive genes in chickens
you responded with: "Not true. And the burden of proof is on you."
When I provided links so you could read about the research yourself
you had no comment.
When I cited Lucy your response was "You claim that a chimp walked
like us. Never happened! Like us means a lot more than just walking
on two legs and no chimp has ever done that as it's primary method of
movement and chimps today walk! So what?!"
Against such a brilliant counter argument who could defend? Oh and
just how can you state such a thing never happened? Should we believe
you simply because you say it? The scientist who did the research and
proved it to the world studied the bones in the knee joint and the
evidence holds. Why won't you listen to the one who proved it?
> . . . which is
> really nothing but examples of microevolution.
Can you explain to us why the platypus has fur but also lays eggs?
How is it that a genetic researcher can give chickens teeth?
> Â You idiots
> spend your time trying to change the subject, instead of
> proving what you claim is true.
Don't lie Dave. It only hurts your credibility. Evidence has been
cited many times and each time you rationalize or deny.
[...]
> You people do not debate honestly!
Coming from you that is funny.
> Â You make the claim
> that macroevolution is a fact of science. Â Someone RESPONDS
> TO YOUR CLAIM and asks for proof and all you can do,
> is try to turn the tables and ask them questions and
> tell them to prove God, or prove it does not happen,
> etc., etc., etc., etc.!
Dave when you say "all you can do is" when in fact they did something
else often and repeatedly then you are telling a lie.
> Not once in this thread, has any of you idiots proved
> macroevolution
How is it that the platypus has fur yet lays eggs? How is it that
flipping a gene will give chickens teeth and flipping a different gene
will give chickens a bonny tail? You won't believe me because I
didn't do this study myself yet you won't believe the guy who did do
the study either. Maybe the problem is that you choose to not believe
under any circumstance.
> . . . and you damn well know it and trying
> to toss insults at me and lie about me lying, does not
> prove it and is a red herring and you damn well know
> that as well and it is why you do it!
We have been citing evidence Dave. How is it that a group of chimps
could walk upright? You cannot explain these facts so you deny and
insult.
House
Because some of the . . . er . . . more delicate individuals were
frightened by the Jayne Cobb reference. And no, I'm not a real Doctor
but Hugh Laurie plays one on TV. ;-)
