Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.athiesm only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.athiesm Profile…
 Up
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: bob young
Date: Jun 20, 2008 21:32

old man joe wrote:
>
> using their own ' science ' as the means to find a reality which
> makes sense only to them, the Evolutionist will not use this same
> science in his own daily life.
>
> this just shows the folly of the ' science ' used to concoct the
> thinking that the sum total of lies equal truth.
>
> the Evolutionist will not get on a bullet train knowing there's
> tracks missing down the line but he certainly gets on the Evolution
> Train with lots of tracks missing in his story line.

............all this shows is that religion can only be
promulgated by using fables, myth and cute stories.

Try harder ................TRY FACTS

You can have every atheist disappear in a puff of smoke
right now - just have your god put in an appearance - you
know like the way you crackpots claim 'He' had one on one
with Moses on that mountain.
Show full article (2.92Kb)
51 Comments
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: roymock
Date: Jun 21, 2008 07:19

On Jun 21, 2:32 pm, bob young netvigator.com> wrote:
> old man joe wrote:
>
>> using their own ' science ' as the means to find a reality which
>> makes sense only to them, the Evolutionist will not use this same
>> science in his own daily life.
>
>> this just shows the folly of the ' science ' used to concoct the
>> thinking that the sum total of lies equal truth.
>
>> the Evolutionist will not get on a bullet train knowing there's
>> tracks missing down the line but he certainly gets on the Evolution
>> Train with lots of tracks missing in his story line.

I had always understood that the theory of evolution is flawed since
there are no missing-links to be found: but I've recently come across
this piece by a well known scientist in the media, here
http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/science/podcast/gmis/gmis20080605.mp3
(http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/ ) who cites some examples to the
contrary.
> ............all this shows is that religion can only be
> promulgated by using fables, myth and cute stories.
>
> Try harder ................TRY FACTS
>
> You can have every atheist disappear in a puff...
Show full article (3.41Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: Cory Albrecht
Date: Jun 21, 2008 09:17

roymock@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2:32 pm, bob young netvigator.com> wrote:
>> old man joe wrote:
>>
>>> using their own ' science ' as the means to find a reality which
>>> makes sense only to them, the Evolutionist will not use this same
>>> science in his own daily life.
>>> this just shows the folly of the ' science ' used to concoct the
>>> thinking that the sum total of lies equal truth.
>>> the Evolutionist will not get on a bullet train knowing there's
>>> tracks missing down the line but he certainly gets on the Evolution
>>> Train with lots of tracks missing in his story line.
>
> I had always understood that the theory of evolution is flawed since
> there are no missing-links to be found: but I've recently come across
> this piece by a well known scientist...
Show full article (1.35Kb)
no comments
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: roymock
Date: Jun 21, 2008 14:13

On Jun 22, 2:17 am, Cory Albrecht hotmail.com> wrote:
> roym...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Jun 21, 2:32 pm, bob young netvigator.com> wrote:
>>> old man joe wrote:
>
>>>> using their own ' science ' as the means to find a reality which
>>>> makes sense only to them, the Evolutionist will not use this same
>>>> science in his own daily life.
>>>> this just shows the folly of the ' science ' used to concoct the
>>>> thinking that the sum total of lies equal truth.
>>>> the Evolutionist will not get on a bullet train knowing there's
>>>> tracks missing down the line but he certainly gets on the Evolution
>>>> Train with lots of tracks missing in his story line.
>
>> I had always understood that the theory of evolution is flawed since
>> there are no missing-links to be found: but I've recently come across
>> this piece by a well known scientist in the media, here
>>http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/science/podcast/gmis/gmis20080605.mp3
>> (http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/) who cites some examples to the
>> contrary. ...
Show full article (2.11Kb)
no comments
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: Pastor Dave
Date: Jun 22, 2008 01:27

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT), roymock@gmail.com
spake thusly:
>I had always understood that the theory of evolution
>is flawed since there are no missing-links to be found:
>but I've recently come across this piece by a well known
>scientist in the media, here
>http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/science/podcast/gmis/gmis20080605.mp3
>(http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/ )
>who cites some examples to the contrary.

No, he doesn't. And as to that other link in another
message, no, those are not transitionals. Not even
close, dude!

Transitionals are not "flowers to flowers", et al.
That's microevolution, which is a fact of science.
You are claiming macroevolution, which is a
fantasy of scientists who wish to eliminate God.

--

It's hard to stumble when you're down on your knees.
2 Comments
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: roymock
Date: Jun 22, 2008 04:59

On Jun 22, 6:27 pm, Pastor Dave _gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT), roym...@gmail.com
> spake thusly:
>
>>I had always understood that the theory of evolution
>>is flawed since there are no missing-links to be found:
>>but I've recently come across this piece by a well known
>>scientist in the media, here
>>http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/science/podcast/gmis/gmis20080605.mp3
>>(http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/)
>>who cites some examples to the contrary.
>
> No, he doesn't. And as to that other link in another
> message, no, those are not transitionals. Not even
> close, dude!

It was only a piece by a scientist well known in the media in my
country. I dunno if his take is challenged by the scientific
community regards transitionals, or if they have different opinions in
this field.
Show full article (2.28Kb)
2 Comments
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: Pastor Dave
Date: Jun 22, 2008 06:04

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:59:59 -0700 (PDT), roymock@gmail.com
spake thusly:
>On Jun 22, 6:27 pm, Pastor Dave wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT),
>> roym...@gmail.com spake thusly:
>>
>>>I had always understood that the theory of evolution
>>>is flawed since...
Show full article (12.09Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: Dr. House
Date: Jun 22, 2008 06:46

On Jun 22, 1:27 am, Pastor Dave _gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT), roym...@gmail.com
> spake thusly:
>
>>I had always understood that the theory of evolution
>>is flawed since there are no missing-links to be found:
>>but I've recently come across this piece by a well known
>>scientist in the media, here
>>http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/science/podcast/gmis/gmis20080605.mp3
>>(http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/)
>>who cites some examples to the contrary.
>
> No, he doesn't.  And as to that other link in another
> message, no, those are not transitionals.  Not even
> close, dude!
>
> Transitionals are not "flowers to flowers", et al.
> That's microevolution, which is a fact of science.
> You are claiming macroevolution, which is a
> fantasy of scientists who wish to eliminate God. ...
Show full article (2.39Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: Randy ®
Date: Jun 22, 2008 11:37

On 6/22/2008 8:04 AM, Pastor Dave wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:59:59 -0700 (PDT), roymock@gmail.com
> spake thusly:
>
>
>> On Jun 22, 6:27 pm, Pastor Dave wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT),
>>> roym...@gmail.com spake thusly:
>>>
>>>> I had always understood that the theory of evolution
>>>> is flawed since there are no missing-links to be found:
>>>> but I've recently come across this piece by a well known
>>>> scientist in the media, here
>>>> http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/science/podcast/gmis/gmis20080605.mp3
>>>> (http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/)
>>>> who cites some examples to the contrary.
>>> No, he doesn't. And as to that other link in another
>>> message, no, those are not transitionals. Not even
>>> close, dude! ...
Show full article (13.13Kb)
no comments
Re: Would an Evolutionist get on a Bullet Train knowing there are tracks missing down the line ?         


Author: Cory Albrecht
Date: Jun 22, 2008 16:31

Pastor Dave wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:59:59 -0700 (PDT), roymock@gmail.com
> spake thusly:
>
>
>> On Jun 22, 6:27 pm, Pastor Dave wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT),
>>> roym...@gmail.com spake thusly:
>>>
>>>> I had always understood that the theory of evolution
>>>> is flawed since there are no missing-links to be found:
>>>> but I've recently come across this piece by a well known
>>>> scientist in the media, here
>>>> http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/science/podcast/gmis/gmis20080605.mp3
>>>> (http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/)
>>>> who cites some examples to the contrary.
>>> No, he doesn't. And as to that other link in another
>>> message, no, those are not transitionals. Not even
>>> close, dude! ...
Show full article (9.31Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Track gift keeps Poppy Line on trackuk.railway ·
1 2 3 4 5 6