>   the whole idea of dinosaur's not co-existing with man is really
> built on the premise of the Catholic Big Bang Theory and the Atheist
> idea of Evolution.
>
>   the Atheist will not move from his position even though he shown
> secular proof that life doesn't spawn out of a bunch of the same
> elements that are not alive today and never were alive way back when.
>
>   the Atheist / Evolutionist is arguing against his own conscience
> since he knows full well there is a God because God made Himself
> evident to him.  ( Ro. 1:18-20 )
>
>   the Atheist / Evolutionist suppresses this knowledge within himself
> according to these and other text of Holy Scripture... he lies to
> himself and those who believe God know this.
>
>   his anger is illustrated by the foul language he must use in order
> to try and prove his lies... he thinks he justifies himself by calling
> people names.  that's his best shot at proving his point... ...

> On Jan 11, 3:47 am, old man joe home.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>>   the whole idea of dinosaur's not co-existing with man is really
>> built on the premise of the Catholic Big Bang Theory and the Atheist
>> idea of Evolution.

>

>>   the Atheist will not move from his position even though he shown
>> secular proof that life doesn't spawn out of a bunch of the same
>> elements that are not alive today and never were alive way back when.

>

>>   the Atheist / Evolutionist is arguing against his own conscience
>> since he knows full well there is a God because God made Himself
>> evident to him.  ( Ro. 1:18-20 )

>

>>   the Atheist / Evolutionist suppresses this knowledge within himself ...

>
> REPLY:  Its because its NOT about evidence to believe ;  its about the
> WILL not to believe to perpetuate a lifestyle that an atheist wants
> without anyone telling him how to live. This was confessed...

>
> AND WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT YOU AND OMJ HAVE THAT DINO'S AND MAN LIVED
> TOGETHER?

> ken wrote:
>

>> AND WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT YOU AND OMJ HAVE THAT DINO'S AND MAN LIVED
>> TOGETHER?

>
> crocodiles? unchanged for millenea, perfectly evolved for their environment.
>
> swearing at them doesn't help, almost stooping to their level, it suggests
> that you are losing the argument, which is not the case. so long as you have
> 2 brain cells to rub together and create thought you're doing better than
> them.
>
> i subscribed to this NG hoping for reasoned debate, we all have our own
> ideas (not quite true, some have the ideas they've been given, but never
> mind) and i wasn't expecting the childish abuse i'm seeing.
>
> tony (athiest and proud to search for truth)

> On Jan 11, 10:03 am, "tony h" home.com> wrote:

>> ken wrote:
>>

>>> AND WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT YOU AND OMJ HAVE THAT DINO'S AND MAN
>>> LIVED TOGETHER?

>>
>> crocodiles? unchanged for millenea, perfectly evolved for their
>> environment.
>>
>> swearing at them doesn't help, almost stooping to their level, it
>> suggests that you are losing the argument, which is not the case. so
>> long as you have 2 brain cells to rub together and create thought
>> you're doing better than them.
>>
>> i subscribed to this NG hoping for reasoned debate, we all have our
>> own ideas (not quite true, some have the ideas they've been given,
>> but never mind) and i wasn't expecting the childish abuse i'm seeing.
>>
>> tony (athiest and proud to search for truth) ...

> On Jan 11, 7:23 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>

>> REPLY:  Its because its NOT about evidence to believe ;  its about the
>> WILL not to believe to perpetuate a lifestyle that an atheist wants
>> without anyone telling him how to live. This was confessed recently by
>> Ken the retired chemist in this NG  and is the focal point of all
>> atheists.  There is psychology to being an atheist  and its centered
>> around the persons personal ulterior motives for not FOLLOWING  the
>> Creator even though deep down inside every atheist
>> knows ,intrinsically, that a personal almighty very intelligent
>> Creator has to exist for what we have . Afterall,  what we can see,
>> test, and sense...is hardly the result of a very big random explosion
>> for no reason , purpose, and by accident.  Last time i blew something
>> up it gave me chaos . But it HAS TO BE different for a willful
>> 'atheist.'-

>
> LIAR   Here's what I actually said, not what was filtered into your ...

> On Jan 11, 10:58 am, ken aol.com> wrote:

>> On Jan 11, 7:23 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>

>>> REPLY: Its because its NOT about evidence to believe ; its about the
>>> WILL not to believe to perpetuate a lifestyle that an atheist wants
>>> without anyone telling him how to live. This was confessed recently
>>> by Ken the retired chemist in this NG and is the focal point of all
>>> atheists. There is psychology to being an atheist and its centered
>>> around the persons personal ulterior motives for not FOLLOWING the
>>> Creator even though deep down inside every atheist
>>> knows ,intrinsically, that a personal almighty very intelligent
>>> Creator has to exist for what we have . Afterall, what we can see,
>>> test, and sense...is hardly the result of a very big random
>>> explosion for no reason , purpose, and by accident. Last time i
>>> blew something up it gave me chaos . But it HAS TO BE different for
>>> a willful 'atheist.'- ...

> the whole idea of dinosaur's not co-existing with man is really
> built on the premise of the Catholic Big Bang Theory and the Atheist
> idea of Evolution.
>
> the Atheist will not move from his position even though he shown
> secular proof that life doesn't spawn out of a bunch of the same
> elements that are not alive today and never were alive way back when.
>
> the Atheist / Evolutionist is arguing against his own conscience
> since he knows full well there is a God because God made Himself
> evident to him. ( Ro. 1:18-20 )
>
> the Atheist / Evolutionist suppresses this knowledge within himself
> according to these and other text of Holy Scripture... he lies to
> himself and those who believe God know this.
>
> his anger is illustrated by the foul language he must use in order ...

> On Jan 11, 10:58 am, ken aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Jan 11, 7:23 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" gmail.com> wrote:

>

>>> REPLY:  Its because its NOT about evidence to believe ;  its about the
>>> WILL not to believe to perpetuate a lifestyle that an atheist wants
>>> without anyone telling him how to live. This was confessed recently by
>>> Ken the retired chemist in this NG  and is the focal point of all
>>> atheists.  There is psychology to being an atheist  and its centered
>>> around the persons personal ulterior motives for not FOLLOWING  the
>>> Creator even though deep down inside every atheist
>>> knows ,intrinsically, that a personal almighty very intelligent
>>> Creator has to exist for what we have . Afterall,  what we can see,
>>> test, and sense...is hardly the result of a very big random explosion ...