>   here we have the followers of Darwin, not only proud of his being an
> Atheist but also so incapable of finding a woman who would want the
> likes of him... so he had to stay inside his own family to find a
> wife... his own first cousin !   ( Source : Wikipedia.com )
>
>   when it comes to the things of God an Atheist is the last person on
> earth to consult with... Atheists hate God and their hate is real, not
> some delusion.  God made Himself evident to all persons but because
> they are haughty in their heart of hearts, they've suppressed this
> truth rendering themselves inexcusable liars.  ( Ro. 1:18-20 )
>
>   Darwin, going one step further, added incest to the demonstration of
> his ill will toward God and his fellow man by marrying his first
> cousin... being morally bankrupt and an Atheist sure does put a spin
> on conclusions drawn in all other areas of life...
>
> ... since one must take all his conclusions as to the origin of
> species on faith, ( there isn't a bit of hard evidence to put on the
> table to prove his point... just rhetoric... ) one is supposed to take
> on faith his conclusions ( without proof ) from  a despotic,
> incestuous, snobby Brit, who's best shot at credibility is his lust
> for girls of his own family as well as his being a Unitarian turned
> Atheist.
>
> ***********************************************************************
>
>   marrying and having children by incest was allowed by God for the
> purpose of producing the human race up until the time the Law of God
> was handed down to Moses over 3,000 years ago.  since then, incest
> became forbidden by God to all people worldwide... but why should
> someone who believes and teaches children that they came from monkeys
> care what others think about his marrying his own first cousin ?
>
>   by the same Darwinian logic he could have married his own mother and
> had children by her as well... incest is incest...
>
>   in review... here we have Charles Darwin, incestuous Atheist
> desperately trying to prove with words alone, but never with
> scientific proof, that there is no God ( which perfectly describes
> God's charge against Darwin types 2000 years before Darwin was even
> born )..
>
>   and here we have a Catholic priest Atheist desperately trying to
> prove there is no God by his concoction of the Big Bang theory.
>
>   let see now... if you bake bread for a living,  you're a baker...
>
>   if you're a Darwin disciple you're an Atheist with the potential for
> incest...
>
>   if you're a Big Bang theorist you're a Catholic Atheist...
>
>   sure doesn't sound like a bunch of believable people just by seeing
> their seedy way of life.