old man joe
home.com> cut and pasted the following trash
news:140nc4p13bat1q8g5q8jbp07imn7tfr3ae@4ax.com:
>
> here we have the followers of Darwin, not only proud of his being an
> Atheist but also so incapable of finding a woman who would want the
> likes of him... so he had to stay inside his own family to find a
> wife... his own first cousin ! ( Source :
Wikipedia.com )
As I pointed out before
- cousin marriage was an accepted practice in Darwin's time
- Darwin married his cousin before Mendel published his work on genetics
- Jacob married his first cousins Rachel and Leah. Between them he sired
eight inbred sons, plus four more bastard sons by their handmaids. Since
Jacob is considered the father of Israel, that means that Moses, and
everyone who came after, including Jesus, are the progeny of incest.
>
> when it comes to the things of God an Atheist is the last person on
> earth to consult with... Atheists hate God and their hate is real, not
> some delusion. God made Himself evident to all persons but because
> they are haughty in their heart of hearts, they've suppressed this
> truth rendering themselves inexcusable liars. ( Ro. 1:18-20 )
Still hanging on to this delusion that atheists hate God? It's really
hard to hate things that don't exist.
>
> Darwin, going one step further, added incest to the demonstration of
> his ill will toward God and his fellow man by marrying his first
> cousin... being morally bankrupt and an Atheist sure does put a spin
> on conclusions drawn in all other areas of life...
Yet only half as bankrupt at Jacob. Felt so nice he went and did it
twice!
>
> ... since one must take all his conclusions as to the origin of
> species on faith, ( there isn't a bit of hard evidence to put on the
> table to prove his point... just rhetoric... ) one is supposed to take
> on faith his conclusions ( without proof ) from a despotic,
> incestuous, snobby Brit, who's best shot at credibility is his lust
> for girls of his own family as well as his being a Unitarian turned
> Atheist.
Liar! There's lots of hard evidence. The only rhetoric here is yours.
>
>
> ***********************************************************************
>
> marrying and having children by incest was allowed by God for the
> purpose of producing the human race up until the time the Law of God
> was handed down to Moses over 3,000 years ago. since then, incest
> became forbidden by God to all people worldwide... but why should
> someone who believes and teaches children that they came from monkeys
> care what others think about his marrying his own first cousin ?
Really? God allowed incest before Moses? Where does it say that in the
Bible? Please supply a one of your famous cut and paste Bible quotes to
support your claim, otherwise we can only take it as an assumption on
your part.
>
> by the same Darwinian logic he could have married his own mother and
> had children by her as well... incest is incest...
Kinda like when Lot's daughters got him drunk and had their way with him?
>
> in review... here we have Charles Darwin, incestuous Atheist
> desperately trying to prove with words alone, but never with
> scientific proof, that there is no God ( which perfectly describes
> God's charge against Darwin types 2000 years before Darwin was even
> born )..
>
> and here we have a Catholic priest Atheist desperately trying to
> prove there is no God by his concoction of the Big Bang theory.
Still holding on to this fantasy as well Joe? I think I've debunked this
lie three or four times for you. Like it or not, the universe is
expanding. It has been verified by Hubble and everyone since. If you run
time backwards, the universe contracts, getting smaller and smaller until
it becomes a singularity. Now surely, with your self proclaimed superior
intellect you can grasp this concept.
>
> let see now... if you bake bread for a living, you're a baker...
>
> if you're a Darwin disciple you're an Atheist with the potential for
> incest...
But only half as much as those who believe the Bible, based on Jacob's
double play.
>
> if you're a Big Bang theorist you're a Catholic Atheist...
I'm pretty sure Gamow was a Jewish atheist, and Hawking is an ex-Anglican
turned agnostic. Nothing Catholic about those two.
>
>
> sure doesn't sound like a bunch of believable people just by seeing
> their seedy way of life.
You're not very believable either. So does that fact make you seedy as
well?
--
Men become civilized, not in proportion to their willingness to believe,
but in proportion to their readiness to doubt - Ambrose Bierce
http://www.apatheticagnostic.com/
