On Sep 20, 6:30 am, Lady Azure
galls.org> wrote:> Tiktaalik wrote:
>
>> On Sep 18, 6:52 am, Lady Azure
galls.org> wrote:>>> Tiktaalik wrote:
>
>>>> On Sep 17, 7:18 am, Lady Azure
galls.org> wrote:>>>>> Tiktaalik wrote:
>
>>>>>> On Sep 16, 7:21 am, Azure
pharae.org> wrote:>>>>>>> Tiktaalik wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 8, 4:11 am, Lady Azure
pharae.org> wrote:>>>>>>>>> Tiktaalik wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 11:08 pm, old man jerkoff
home.com> smirked:>
> Never does respond to me.
Or anyone else. Jesus H. Christ woman, why are YOU responding to old
posts? Stay with the programme.
>>>>>>>>>>> here we have the followers of Darwin, not only proud of his being an
>>>>>>>>>>> Atheist but also so incapable of finding a woman who would want the
>>>>>>>>>>> likes of him... so he had to stay inside his own family to find a
>>>>>>>>>>> wife... his own first cousin ! ( Source :
Wikipedia.com )
>
> As pointed out on the News a Format which can be like any word, altered
> at will, upon personal knowledge, conviction, belief, position, intended
> jest, or even willful insult.
Or as Humpty Dumpty said "it means whatever I want it to mean".
>>>>>>>>>> And your precious Abraham, that paragon of virtue, married his half-
>>>>>>>>>> sister and shagged her maid who he then abandoned in the desert along
>>>>>>>>>> with their bastard son. What a sterling example to us all.
>
> SNIP
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>> Remainder of bigoted bollocksology snipped.
>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah well the Tribes of the 6, from Abraham's Second Wife are
>>>>>>>>> considerably different than the 12 born of the Slave.
>>>>>>>>> We are the "Tribes of Law".
>>>>>>>>> AKA Common Law Rule 1 I Believe, "I am my fathers son", but in the
>>>>>>>>> Tribes of the 6 also "I am my Mothers Son".
>
>>>>>>>> And just what has this to do with the price of potatoes in County
>>>>>>>> Carlow?
>
>>>>>>> Quite a Bit, the Tribes of the 6, are "The Children of Nature", and have
>>>>>>> a different teaching
>>>>>>> which does allow evolution.
>
>>>>>> Glad to know they take an interest in science.
>
>>>>> Angels of Knowledge, not those who call Knowledge Evil.
>
>>>> As creationists frequently do.
>
>>> Yeah well Joe goes even further, I understand he is a Calvinist.
>>> Talk about "Conservative Right".
>
>> I'd rather not, there are more interesting things to talk about.
>
> Really, then why do you pursue him?
In order to show him up for the snivelling, sanctimonious hypocritical
piece of human offal he so obviously is. Why do you defend him?
>>>>>>> 1 Day is as 1,000 Years to Man or to those people, one heck of a long
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>> 7 Day's WOW!
>>>>>>> I mean it takes 1,000 years to become a God ya know.
>
>>>>>> How does one "become" a God? I thought there was only one who always existed.
>
> Read the story/legend of Horous, the Wadjet, Cyclops, All Seeing Eye,
> lives life as a man and upon death becomes the New Osiris, God.
> Ar El, Uir El, Pur El, the Shi Vad, Lotus.........
You're doing it again.
>>>>> There is but One "GOD" That which Is, Was, and Forever Shall Be "ALL THINGS".
>>>>> That said there are those known as Local Gods or the Gods who Walked the
>>>>> Earth.
>>>>> Jesus, Krishna, Rama, Buddha, Fu Xi, Gaia, Rhea, Isis, Odin, Zeus . . .
>
>>>> I don't think Buddha ever claimed to be a god. Could be wrong though.
>
>>> He said the same as me, "I am not GOD!
>>> Those of My Family were not GOD!
>>> Indra was not "GOD"!
>
> That Said, Buddha walked away from his inheritance as Indra's Heir.
> He was a Somebody who became Nobody, I was claimed a Nobody, which is in
> actuality THE somebody, hiding in secret among mankind.
> The problem is, they knew who I was before I did.
Remarkably prescient of "them".
>>>>>>> I was responding to a bigoted, small-minded, self-righteous,
>>>>>>>> sanctimonious hypocrite who was trying to indulge in some cheap point-
>>>>>>>> scoring by casting aspersions on the morals of a man whose boots he is
>>>>>>>> not fit to lick so I cited the behaviour of one of his biblical heroes
>>>>>>>> in return.
>
>>>>>>> I was only adding my point of view.
>
>>>>>> Fair enough. But I do wish you'd stay with the programme.
>
> I am you insulted "All Heirs" of Abraham,
As I am not personally acquainted with "All Heirs" of Abraham I could
hardly insult them now could I?
> my family are of the Tribes of
> the 6, named on multiple counts in Gen 25:2, but Daddy was Shua, the
> "Wee Folk" of the House of Abraham and Keturah.
> Mommy was a Daughter of the Earth, Xion, ard (Heir) to the Yellow Witch,
> Bear to the Cave of the North Wind, House of the River.
Should I then be addressing you as "Your Royal Highness" or something
like that?
>>>>>>> Screw the 12 tribes or the 6 tribes, they are irrelevant to
>
>>>>>>>> the issue.
>
>>>>>> No, actually they are not.
>>>>>> In what way are they relevant to a feeble attempt at the character
>>>>>> assassination of a great scientist by a sanctimonious small-minded
>>>>>> lying hypocrite?
>
> You attack my ancestors,
I don't know your ancestors. If I wanted to attack them I'd need a
time machine.
> I am a Descendant under "LAW" Named (Numbers
> 13:16 in the Word)My family are Born of Freedom, Wild and Untamed, born
> of Love not Slavery.
> The Wild Ones have Never known Slavery, and have always "Fought the
> Whip", why Rome insults the Hylic's at every turn.
> To Rome the Travelers, are the "Niggers of the Universe".
> Of which "I" am the 3 G's of the Arianhod, PROPER.
> Not only a descendant of the name, but the name is a soundex cabal, of
> my name proper.
> The whole story is.
Bully for you.
>>> You decide.
>
>> I already did.
>
>>> 12 Fakers stole the inheritance of the 6 and have engaged in Genocide
>>> against us for Millennia.
>
>> And this is relevant..................How?
>
>>>>>>> And Abraham didn't have a second wife, he raped a servant
>
>>>>>>>> who had no choice in the matter.
>
> There was my relevance, and why and where I entered my point of view.
So Abraham's Jolly Rogering of Hagar is somehow relevant to you. Or
is it vice versa? Do YOU own a time machine?
>>>>>>> WRONG, go back 3 spaces, Gen 25: Abraham had a "SECOND WIFE",
>>>>>>> after Sarah Died, he married Keturah.
>
>>>>>> Sorry, I should have made it clear that I was referring to Abraham's
>>>>>> cosy little domestic arrangement with his half-sister and her
>>>>>> handmaid. Bet Hagar never got to plead "a headache".
>
>>>>> You denied he had a Second Wife "At All".
>
>>>> Quite the little pedant aren't you? I suppose you are never guilty of
>>>> a slip of the tongue. Or mind. Or keyboard.
>
>>> Oh Yeah but every person out there lets me know when I do.
>
>> Refresh my memory. When did I do this?
>
> In one form or another virtually every post.
Cite a specific instance.
>>> Miss a Comma and your an Illiterate who doesn't even have the right to
>>> post on the Net.
>
>> You said it not I.
>
> True enough on that issue itself that was simple reference on my part
> sorry.
> You do however insist that my posts are irrelevant.
Because they are.
> When the issue YOU BROUGHT UP, is what I was responding to.
The issue was BROUGHT UP by old man jerkoff. As you well know.
>>>>> He did.
>
>>>> And?
>
>>>>> Wild Ones, Scape Goats, they left society believing building all these
>>>>> monuments and
>>>>> raping the Earth the way man does will destroy the planet.
>>>>> Ancient Greenies?
>>>>> Yep, Green Man, he liked Trees.
>
>>>> Relevance please. Or are you indulging in some kind of cheap wisecrack
>>>> regarding my environmentalist position?
>
>>> Yours?
>>> Eagles of the Isle of Man are the Tribes of the Miden(?)
>>> The Heap, the Undergrounders
>>> who quite some time ago, built their society around recycling
>>> everything.
>>> They have always believed in "Evolution" even in the Word, they believed
>>> in evolution.
>>> The word evolves every 2,000 years according to Legends.
>>> The people of the 12, got so torked about God checking in every 2,000
>>> years,
>>> they Locked God in a Mountain.
>>> Daniel 8: The Red Goat evolves the Word next.
>
>> You've lost me. Do stay with the programme.
>
> I am you wonder in pursuit of vamperistic intentions against Joe, who
> you can't influence.
If I was a vampire and he was the last human on earth I would rather
run out into the blazing sunlight, drink a gallon of Holy Water, set
fire to myself, swallow a crucifix or fall on a wooden stake than
touch him. And do try to make up what passes for your mind, first you
say that I am a vampire hater, now you accuse me of "vamperistic
intentions".
>>>>>>> The Tribes of the 6 are the Sparrows of the Fields, the Wild Beasts,
>>>>>>> Those who "NEVER KNEW SLAVERY".
>
>>>>>> Good for them.
>
>>>>> Yeah, had people like, Nemedia (Nemesis) Vercingetorix, Atilla.
>
>>>> Had they what? Relevance please.
>
> Tribes of the Law, Children of Abraham and Keturah.
Wow, that Abraham surely believed in spreading it around.
>>> Nemesis is Karma or Justice, King of the Hill, including the females.
>
>> If you say so.
>
> Yeah, kewl history, Amazon's, Dyionisis, Drag Queens taking over Delphi
> after Nemedia was raped, Lug, the Silver Wheel, Mountains with Voice
> Activated Doors, the Sword of Light, Nuada, Mechanical Arms. . .
You left out Muffin the Mule.
>>>>> Did you know that Atilla was Pendragon?
>
>>>> Didn't know, don't care. Relevance please.
>
> Red Bull is Atilla, Atilla was King of the Hill, the same Hill,
> Vercingetorix Ruled.
You're doing it AGAIN!
>>> To Hatred, Atilla is Satan.
>
> Rome decided the teachings of the descendants was to dangerous and after
> Vercingetorix and Atilla never wanted to deal with the situation again,
> so they demonized us.
> Daemon was one of my Ancestors.
> I am the E d'Munster, get the pun to the tv show.
Nah, don't watch TV. I prefer to buy DVDs.
>>> Ask Joe about Satan.
>>> Ask him why Satan is evil,'
>
>> You jest of course. I wouldn't ask him the time of day. And wouldn't
>> believe him if he said Christmas Day fell on December 25th.
>
> Yet you pursue him in cross posts across the net?
See my previous comment re. the Grand Scumpouch.
>>> see if it isn't because Satan gave us the Fruit of Knowledge.
>>> How can you argue with a Family who has for time unknown determined
>>> Knowledge is Evil
>>> and Bred it out of their family.
>
>> I don't.
>
> Yes you do!!
> That is what this thread was about.
Nope, I don't argue with families, I leave that to the Mafia.
>>>>> Tattoo thing check it out.
>
>>>> Why? Relevance please.
>
> Mark of the Chosen, Sarmation Mark of the Royal Sacred, Hun also,
> Gnostic Tradition stems from it.
>From a tattoo? WAY OUT THERE!
>>> To Evolution?
>
> Yes
Did Charles Darwin have one?
>>> I bear that mark, top center right forearm...........
>
>> Which one (mark that is, not forearm).
>
> Tattoo of God, the Seahorse, Mother Male of the Ocean, the Unicorn or
> Wild Red Ox, the "Dragons Head" or MARK OF THE BEAST.
I thought that was Damien Thorn. Oh I forgot, his was on his head.
>>>>>>>>> England is run by a Queen right, Her Children are Hardly "THE HUSBANDS",
>>>>>>>>> but HERS.
>
>>>>>>>> Funny, I was under the impression that they were both.
>
>>>>>>> Not in Regards to the COURT they are not.
>>>>>>> They do not bare his name, they bare Hers.
>
>>>>>> Simply because of this "Royal family" nonsense.
>
>>> Yes
>
>>>> Anyway I do not think
>>>>>> that Prince Philip would look too kindly on the notion that he had no claim on his children.
>
>>>>> Ask him they are National Treasures not his "Property".
>
>>>> Ones family is not ones property.
>
>>> Right one point got through.
>
>>>> Do you consider yourself to be your parents property?
>
>>> Nope, I am not my father and my father is not me.
>>> As such there I find JESUS IS NOT GOD!
>
>> Wouldn't disagree there.
>
>>>> And human beings are not national treasures.
>
>>> You are Not a True Sovereign or Noble and have no concept of the life of
>>> a Golden Child.
>
>> No, just an ordinary human being. And every bit as good as any vacuous
>> inbred ponce claiming to have "blue blood", probably a great deal
>> better than most.
>
> Yeah, well, I always felt that way until I looked up and found the place
> is run not by truth, logic, or rights, but Good Ole Boy Relationships,
> which forgot that according to the legends, if you are going to have a
> King, or Worship Man, is is MY FAMILY you Bow to,
As I neither have a King nor worship Homo not-so-sapiens I won't be
doing any bowing.
> you never slap the
> Wild Ox, Tain is Gods Chosen Weapon.(Deu 33:)
I wouldn't even slap a domestic one, I have strong views on the
subject of animal abuse.
>>>>> Unless of
>
>>>>>>>> course Her Majesty was having it off with the Royal Milkman. Either
>>>>>>>> way children belong to both parents in a marriage. As distinct from
>>>>>>>> the legalised rape indulged in by Abraham and his fellow patriarchs.
>
>>>>>>> Nope you are the narrow minded Bigot attempting to attack
>>>>>>> both my understandings and others faiths, so who is who?
>
>>>>>> Back up there Missy.
>
>>> Homophobic Bigot!
>
>> OK I'll rephrase. Back up there Homophobic Bigot. Or do you prefer
>> "Missy Homophobic Bigot"?
>
> Laddie of the Gall's is hardly a Title befitting a Homophobe, I just
> hate Crag type Queers who point fingers of shame at people like me.
Why would they do that? What are "people like you?
> Fagots who hang out in secret giving blow jobs in public restrooms then
> run home to share their good fortunes of the day with their wife and
> some even the kids.
'Tis the way of the modern world. "Their shame is their pride" as it
says somewhere in the Bible.
> But people like me spread aids, we are responsible for the Gay Plague,
> God Hates Queers.
You are some kind of Aids Demon?
> Red Ox material there, as in "Male Bovine Fecal Matter".(Gen 4 last 2
> verses) After Cain slew Able, God gave Eve Seth, a 3rd son Born in the
> image of Adam before the separation.
So God and Eve were having it off. Must have been a practice run for
when he got around to Mary.
>>>>>>If YOU were not so blinded by narrow-minded
>>>>>> bigotry you would realise that the only one I am "attacking" is a
>>>>>> petty, spiteful, lying hypocrite
>
>>> You are speaking to me at the moment and you are the one who is being
>>> narrow minded and bigoted.
>
>> Rather fetching shade of ebony you are sporting Miss Pot.
>
> NO, I am the Darkness itself, but understand, the dark ones are born of
> fire, the whites are born of darkness and devoid of the color which Fire
> imparts.
Most profound.
>>> The problem I saw and responded to is I find both creationist theory and
>>> scientific theory, both wrong.
>
>> I see. You are right and everyone else is wrong. Glad we cleared that
>> up.
>
> Yep, but I am not "Alone" on the view.
> So, you are the one who claims to be all knowledgeable on the subject.
Never made such a claim outside of your oh-so-vivid imagination.
> There is no room for discussion.
Your words not mine.
> That is why you keep up the relevance thingy.
No, I keep it up because it is er................relevant.
>>> Both Closed Minded to the other and both unwilling to share the floor.
>>> The Thought said I AM and BANG all things became, the winds blew, the
>>> waters came forth, the vegetation came forth, life began, the Creatures
>>> of the Fields multiplied, and man came.
>
>> Man usually does. Frequently and regularly, that's why there is a
>> population problem.
>
> According to the legend, not only did God Separate the Body into Male
> and Female, but for added Luck stuck a finger in swirled it around and
> said "Now be thou Fruitful and Multiply".
> Man has been screwing anything that moves ever since.
And a lot that doesn't.
>>> Bible talks of Evolution as I see it but that Evolution "INCLUDES GOD".
>>> No matter how old the Earth, the Universe, even life itself is, in the
>>> context of it all,
>>> GOD is but a Child.
>
>> Who's his daddy then?
>
> The Void
Not the impression one would get from Genesis 1.1, 2.
>>>>>>who does not even stick around to
>>>>>> defend the hate-filled drivel he spews, preferring to post and crawl
>>>>>> back into the sewer where he belongs. If you choose to side with him,
>>>>>> as you obviously do, don't blame me or anyone else if your delicate
>>>>>> sensibilities become somewhat bruised as a result. And for the record
>>>>>> I could not give a flying (insert word that rhymes with "truck") about
>>>>>> your "understandings and others faiths". If you cannot handle the
>>>>>> truth then the problem is yours.
>
>>>>> I am not the one going off on a RANT, you are!
>
>>>> Try this for a RANT: "Nope you are the narrow minded Bigot attempting
>>>> to attack
>>>> both my understandings and others faiths, so who is who?" Look
>>>> familiar?
>
>>> Yeah you quoting me to start a fight.
>
>> No need for me to do so. You already did.
>
>>> Your the Neo Nazi attacking the Zionists,
>
>> Playing the victim card now Miss Zionist?
>
> Yep, and you the insult card as usual.
I would not dream of encroaching on your territory. Frightfully bad
form you know.
> What next you going to plonk me with the Virus Bot like the others?
Ah, paranoia rears its ugly head.
>>> your the one who started the
>>> Name calling FIRST.
>
>> You sure you're not a creationist Miss Liar?
>
> I am not the liar, nor off topic with my thread to your postings.
You're giving a most credible imitation.
>>> Your the one who called me a Bigot First
>
>> A reading of the posts will show that I stated that old man jerkoff
>> was bigoted, then you chimed in with your unfounded accusations which
>> led to me quoting your own words.
>
> Which is already apparent, the thread is coherent enough.
Yes. My contribution to it.
>>>>> I am not the one "Insulting" you are!
>
>>>> See: "you are the narrow minded Bigot". Look familiar?
>
>>> Yep I see you are still the Narrow Minded Bigot, the aura is very
>>> familiar
>
>> Didn't your parents ever tell you that projecting your shortcomings
>> onto another person is the height of rudeness?
>
> No, I was told by my Mommy that was how to get what I wanted.
Doesn't seem to be working this time.
> ESP works wonders for a Royal who needs their people.
Would that be Extremely Silly Pontification?
>>>>> Your Idea and My Idea are our own divine spark.
>>>>> I grew up on a poem I don't remember the Author sorry.
>>>>> It Went something like this:
>>>>> I am I and you are you
>>>>> I am not in this world to live up to your expectations, nor you to mine
>>>>> I do my thing and you do yours and if by chance we should meet, it would
>>>>> be beautiful
>
>>>> And?
>
> Figures from you.
Not figures, words.
>>> And you can't share the world, it ain't big enough for you and anyone
>>> else.
>
>> Quoth the one who believes that everyone else is wrong.
>
> I am not the one running around claiming everyone else in the world is
> wrong,
Presumably you are sitting still claiming everyone else in the world
is wrong. It's difficult to type while in motion.
> you are,
Show me where I made any such claim.
> first Joe, now me, who next?
Next for what. A register of posters whose shoe size rates a higher
figure than their IQ score?
>>>>> Antagonis taught about the "Argument!
>>>>> But most misunderstand his teachings.
>>>>> The Argument is not about the words of war but 2+2=, the Quest is what
>>>>> open the Kitchen Door.
>>>>> You can not Quest to understand his side if you close the door on him.
>>>>> Rather you prob only make him colder.
>
>>>> So?
>
>>> So stop cross posting your Vampire Hatred, it is time for Harmony, not
>>> Chaos.
>
>> Personally I've got nothing against vampires. You must be confusing
>> me with Buffy.
>
> Not as the Hound of Hel I can Smell the Blood, Werelich always stand
> against the Vamping of the People.
> Read Beowulf.
> The People come for Fellowship, to share ideas, you and Joe and others
> try to take that away.
> Drag us into Flame Wars to suck us of our Karmic Energy.
> The Net is after all a series of wires along which energy travels.
Yours must have become disconnected.
>>> You do not "Quest for Knowledge or Understanding, just a flame war.
>
>> Started by you my dear, started by you.
>
> NO, Started By YOU, continued By YOU, and now expanding not only from
> its original intended victim, but now attacking me as well.
Do try to refrain from projecting. Face your shortcomings. Overcome
them. Confront reality.
>>>> "The time will come when men such as I will look upon the murder of
>>>> animals as they now look on the murder of men."(Leonardo da Vinci).
>
>>> Yep, some day.
>
>> But neither of us will be around to see it.
>
> Not Sure.
You must intend to live to a very great age.
>> "Auschwitz begins wherever someone looks at a slaughterhouse and
>> thinks: they're only animals!" (Theodor Adorno).
>
> People like You
I do believe my sigs plus my previous postings on the subject tell a
different story Madam Liar. When you have evidence to the contrary
trot it out. In the meantime why don't you try getting laid, it just
might improve your disposition. I wouldn't bet my life savngs on it
though.
"Cruelty is the chief, if not the only sin." (Walter Savage Landor).
>>>>>> "I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the
>>>>>> better for it."(Abraham Lincoln).
>
>>>>>>>> "I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the
>>>>>>>> way of a whole human being." (Abraham Lincoln).
>>>> Scalp the Anglie, they believe in the Perfect Body Right?
>>>>>>> Can't get to heaven with out your hair.
>>>>>>> (Francoise Gautros)- Hide quoted text -
>
>>>>> As one born of the Red OX, Great Bear, Pigs, Hounds(Wolves), Lions, and
>>>>> Eagles,
>>>>> I would hope ONE respects the rights of the "BEAST"!-
