|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Pahu78Pahu78 Date: Mar 20, 2008 13:45
Was There Room?
Could the Ark have held all the animals? Easily. A few humans, some
perhaps hired by others, could build a boat (a). large enough to hold
representatives of every air-breathing land animal--perhaps 16,000
animals in all. (Of course, sea creatures did not need to be on the
Ark. Nor did insects or amphibians. Only mammals, birds, reptiles, and
humans. Much plant life survived the flood in a surprisingly simple
way (b)). The Ark, having at least 1,500,000 cubic feet of space, was
adequate to hold these animals, their provisions, and all their other
needs for one year (c).
|
| Show full article (3.57Kb) |
|
| | 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: tony htony h Date: Mar 20, 2008 15:03
> The Seemingly Impossible Events of a Worldwide Flood Are Credible, If
> Examined Closely.
what happened to the freshwater fish? did the ark hold tanks and filtering
/aeriating equipment?
numpty!
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Date: Apr 5, 2008 03:21
> Was There Room?
>
> Could the Ark have held all the animals? Easily. A few humans, some
> perhaps hired by others, could build a boat (a). large enough to hold
> representatives of every air-breathing land animal--perhaps 16,000
> animals in all. (Of course, sea creatures did not need to be on the
> Ark. Nor did insects or amphibians.
> Since the flood, many offspring of those on the Ark would have become
> reproductively isolated to some degree due to mutations, natural
> genetic variations, and geographic dispersion. Thus, variations within
> a kind have proliferated. Each variation or species we see today did
> not have to be on the Ark. For example, a pair of wolflike animals
> were probably ancestors of the coyotes, dingoes, jackals, and hundreds
> of varieties of domestic dogs.
|
| Show full article (4.93Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: No OneNo One Date: Apr 15, 2008 18:43
gmail.com> wrote in message
news:67b9d4a1-5259-4010-9958-9bc65ec1d302@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
| Was There Room?
|
| Could the Ark have held all the animals? Easily. A few humans, some
| perhaps hired by others, could build a boat (a). large enough to hold
| representatives of every air-breathing land animal--perhaps 16,000
| animals in all. (Of course, sea creatures did not need to be on the
| Ark. Nor did insects or amphibians. Only mammals, birds, reptiles, and
| humans. Much plant life survived the flood in a surprisingly simple
| way (b)). The Ark, having at least 1,500,000 cubic feet of space, was
| adequate to hold these animals, their provisions, and all their other
| needs for one year (c).
|
| Since the flood, many offspring of those on the Ark would have become
| reproductively isolated to some degree due to mutations, natural
| genetic variations, and geographic dispersion. Thus, variations within
| a kind have proliferated. Each variation or species we see today did
| not have to be on the Ark. For example, a pair of wolflike animals
| were probably ancestors of the coyotes, dingoes, jackals, and hundreds ...
|
| Show full article (3.85Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
