>
>"stoney" the.net> wrote in message
>news:vbll34h7quokh26gc4540ml6ckom7d9sh0@4ax.com...

>> On Sun, 25 May 2008 02:22:17 +0100, "Smiler" Joe.King.com>,
>> Message ID: wrote in alt.atheism;
>>

>>>
>>>"stoney" the.net> wrote in message
>>>news:m31h34ti9697vau3q5vkqa91qibcve97fl@4ax.com...

>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:48:55 -0700 (PDT), meg gmail.com>,
>>>> Message ID:
>>>> w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
>>>> wrote in alt.atheism;
>>>>

>>>>>On May 18, 6:32 pm, "Pastor Frank" christfirst.edu> wrote:

>>>>>> "Smiler" Joe.King.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:KJLXj.8114$EH5.571@newsfe30.ams2...
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Pastor Frank" christfirst.edu> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:1e7d5$482f3af4$d1d89aaa$20828@PRIMUS.CA...

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Christ is about ideals of behaviour to live up to, for by the
>>>>>>>> quality
>>>>>>>> of their actions you shall know them. (Jesus in Mt:7:16). All
>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> illustration.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> We sure do know *you* by your actions.
>>>>>>> 11Years of posting your crap to a.a. and how many converts have you
>>>>>>> got?
>>>>>>> Speak up! I can't hear you! Was that a "None"?
>>>>>>> Your actions are those of a rude, pig-ignorant and obnoxious shoe
>>>>>>> salesman, continually knocking on the door of a man he knows has no
>>>>>>> legs,
>>>>>>> trying to sell him a pair of shoes. What can't you get through that
>>>>>>> concrete skull of yours about "We're not interested in your
>>>>>>> delusions!"?
>>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>>> The godless one
>>>>>>> a.a.# 2279

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you posting to Christian groups then? Do I have to scratch
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> one lone atheist group? But then I will be accommodating and I will do
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> scratching for you, and replace the Christian groups with atheist
>>>>>> ones.
>>>>>> Are
>>>>>> you happy now?

>>>>>
>>>>>Where is your religious tolerance not a pastor frank. Go bang your
>>>>>choir boy and leave us alone else you might encourage more to come
>>>>>over to your boards and leave a word or two.

>>>>
>>>> Gosh Meg, now you've gone and gotten Frankenfundy all excited.
>>>>

>>>
>>>It'll keep at least one of his hands occupied elsewhere, other than his
>>>keyboard, for a while ;-)

>>
>> Wouldn't the other be controlling the Hubble on a, possibly fruitless,
>> search?
>>

>
>An Electron Scanning Microscope might be more appropriate as Hubble usually
>looks for very big things that are very far away and the resolution wouldn't
>be fine enough. The search, even with an ESM, would, as you say, possibly be
>fruitless.