> On Sun, 25 May 2008 02:22:17 +0100, "Smiler" Joe.King.com>,
> Message ID: wrote in alt.atheism;
>

>>
>>"stoney" the.net> wrote in message
>>news:m31h34ti9697vau3q5vkqa91qibcve97fl@4ax.com...

>>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:48:55 -0700 (PDT), meg gmail.com>,
>>> Message ID:
>>> w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
>>> wrote in alt.atheism;
>>>

>>>>On May 18, 6:32 pm, "Pastor Frank" christfirst.edu> wrote:

>>>>> "Smiler" Joe.King.com> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:KJLXj.8114$EH5.571@newsfe30.ams2...
>>>>>

>>>>>> "Pastor Frank" christfirst.edu> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:1e7d5$482f3af4$d1d89aaa$20828@PRIMUS.CA...

>>>>>

>>>>>>> Christ is about ideals of behaviour to live up to, for by the
>>>>>>> quality
>>>>>>> of their actions you shall know them. (Jesus in Mt:7:16). All
>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> illustration.

>>>>>

>>>>>> We sure do know *you* by your actions.
>>>>>> 11Years of posting your crap to a.a. and how many converts have you
>>>>>> got?
>>>>>> Speak up! I can't hear you! Was that a "None"?
>>>>>> Your actions are those of a rude, pig-ignorant and obnoxious shoe
>>>>>> salesman, continually knocking on the door of a man he knows has no
>>>>>> legs,
>>>>>> trying to sell him a pair of shoes. What can't you get through that
>>>>>> concrete skull of yours about "We're not interested in your
>>>>>> delusions!"?
>>>>>> Smiler,
>>>>>> The godless one
>>>>>> a.a.# 2279

>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you posting to Christian groups then? Do I have to scratch
>>>>> the
>>>>> one lone atheist group? But then I will be accommodating and I will do
>>>>> this
>>>>> scratching for you, and replace the Christian groups with atheist
>>>>> ones.
>>>>> Are
>>>>> you happy now?

>>>>
>>>>Where is your religious tolerance not a pastor frank. Go bang your
>>>>choir boy and leave us alone else you might encourage more to come
>>>>over to your boards and leave a word or two.

>>>
>>> Gosh Meg, now you've gone and gotten Frankenfundy all excited.
>>>

>>
>>It'll keep at least one of his hands occupied elsewhere, other than his
>>keyboard, for a while ;-)

>
> Wouldn't the other be controlling the Hubble on a, possibly fruitless,
> search?
>