> "old man joe" home.com> wrote in messagenews:bqp264drtf2661a769qv1n7rhcm4nl3utj@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>>  according to scientists, most of which are  Atheists by the way,
>> physical laws are always at play but somehow they didn't apply to form
>> the universe and life as we know it...

>

>>  here's five good reasons the whole story they tell is just that... a
>> story... substantiated by cartoons...

>

>>  1.  Energy can not be created or destroyed they say...

>

>>      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy

>

>>       yet, the mass which Big Banged itself into our universe as we
>> know it today had to came into being by magic.  it was  " always
>> there. "  a fancy idea which is so inconceivable as to warrant no
>> tangible explanation on the part of the Evolutionist.  it's simply
>> given as an unprovable " truth " from which everything that follows,
>> hangs.  ( can you see where they're going with this ? )

>

>>  2.  While the gravity of such a mass was so fantastically great, it
>> managed somehow to explode.  mass converted into energy and the mass
>> exploded outward forming the universe we have today.  mass, in this
>> case, countered this great force of gravity whereas all the matter in
>> the universe was formerly in one place.

>

>>      the tangible ' proof ' offered is a computer graphic cartoon
>> offered on such TV shows as Nova and The History Channel... two
>> Atheistic entities.   you have to take it as truth on Atheistic faith.
>> ( but the Christian is considered stupid for believing God on faith. )

>

>>  3.  Somehow life created itself out of things never alive from a
>> mass that was always there defying gravity and exploding outward into
>> this perfectly balanced universe / solar system of ours...  here we
>> have a bunch of elements which got together and became alive all by
>> themselves.  mass produced energy, ( which can not be created or
>> destroyed, but simply passes from one form of energy to another form
>> of energy, ) and formed a living thing.  life from energy... which
>> defies the proposition that energy can be defined as heat,
>> light,sound, etc... all fitting into 2 categories.   some trick.

>

>>      the same is to say a tornado passed through a grave yard and
>> formed a bunch of living people, male and female... all Evolutionists,
>> of course.

>

>>  4.  Which came first ?  the chicken or the egg ?  the Evolutionist
>> must say the chicken since dinosaurs don't lay chicken eggs.
>> he must agree with point number's 1, 2 and  3 to be true to his
>> philosophy of a Godless creation.  the parents come before the
>> children. from where did the parents come ?  from their parents... all
>> the way back to a bunch of elements acting together on their own from
>> matter and energy acting in partnership to create life.

>

>>    something is missing... life is more than matter and energy.
>> matter and energy does not think.  it is not moral.  it does not love
>> or hate, and it certainly does not evolve out of absolute sterility
>> which was the nature of being of the mass which Big Banged it's way
>> into our solar system.

>

>>      but in the world of Evolution the Dinosaur did in fact lay the
>> egg which eventually became a chicken. they're on record ( The History
>> Channel ) as stating boldly... without proof, of course, that " first
>> it was a chicken which evolved into a dinosaur which evolved back into
>> a chicken again.  this statement is made public by ' educated ' people
>> and supported by yet another cartoon.

>

>>    the Evolutionist talked his universe into being which canceled out
>> God talking His universe into being... ( the circle is almost
>> complete.)

>

>>    5.  Is it not peculiar that the Big Bang Theory was concocted by
>> an Atheist Catholic priest in the last century and then endorsed by
>> the Atheist Catholic Pope of that time ?  that's the very same Pope
>> who gave aid and comfort to the Nazis during WWll.

>

>>     Is it not peculiar that Darwin married his own niece so that his
>> perversion should spill over into all other areas of his life ?
>> to deny such is the same as electing Charles Manson to the Popehood...
>> the crimes of which surpass those of Charles Manson.

>

>>    as the Good Book asks... " Can the Ethiopian change his skin or
>> the leopard his spots?  Then you also can do good who are accustomed
>> to doing evil. "  Jer. 13:23

>

>>   the whole idea of the Big Bang Theory and Evolution is nothing more
>> than an exploration of Metaphysics... mere philosophy, based on
>> Gnosticism.

>

>>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

>

>>   the facts in the case are simple and direct.

>

>>   God spoke the universe into being and made man from it's elements.
>> that's why man's body in not alive since the elements comprising it
>> are not alive, except that God breathed into man "  the breath of
>> life; and man became a living being. "  Gen. 2:7

>

>>   those contending with God over all of this do simply " suppress the
>> truth in unrighteousness " ... " because that which is known about God
>> is evident within them;  for God made it evident to them. "

>

>>     because...

>

>>   " since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His
>> eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being
>> understood through what has been made, so that they are without
>> excuse. "  Ro. 1:18-32

>

>>    " In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth... "
>>       Gen. 1:1

>
> Based on the above bullshit, you must be the dumbest man alive!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -