Re: Definition of Evolution you say ? Huh, it's nothing more than a rhetorical religion of Double-Speak...
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.athiesm only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.athiesm Profile…
 Up
Re: Definition of Evolution you say ? Huh, it's nothing more than a rhetorical religion of Double-Speak...         


Author: Free Lunch
Date: Sep 13, 2008 07:37

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 05:51:54 -0400, in alt.talk.creationism
old man joe home.com> wrote in
4ax.com>:
>
> the last thing Evolution could ever be is a science.

Evolution is a fact. The theory of evolution was developed through
scientific discovery about evolution.
> this is because it expects it's adherents to take the bait that
>living things came from elements never alive... a scientific
>impossibility. not only that, but it expects it's adherents to put in
>the mix and accept it as true that the universe and living beings and
>living things came to life by themselves out of absolute sterility...
>a medical impossibility.

Why do you repeat such a silly claim?
> it requires it's adherents to believe they ' evolved ' from
>monkey's, which makes man nothing more than a smarter monkey.
Show full article (2.74Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Definition of Evolution you say ? Huh, it's nothing more than a rhetorical religion of Double-Speak...         


Author: Andrew
Date: Sep 13, 2008 08:59

On 2008-09-13 15:37:52 +0100, Free Lunch said:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 05:51:54 -0400, in alt.talk.creationism
> old man joe home.com> wrote in
> 4ax.com>:
>>
>> the last thing Evolution could ever be is a science...
Show full article (3.03Kb)
no comments