On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:45:44 -0400, old man joe
home.com> wrote in
alt.talk.creationism:
> it's no surprise to find the Evolutionist hunting high and low for
>some way he can convince himself there is no God... so today, the
>Evolutionist mentions a bolas spider as though this is his proof
>positive there is no God.
I'm not looking for evidence that there is no God because, as you are
keenly aware, there is absolutely no evidence that there are any gods,
not even the one you make unsupported claims about.
> ( the Evolutionists hope is to discredit the Word of God thereby
>discrediting the stirring in his mind which holds him accountable to
>God for his sins... Ro. 1:18-20 )
There is no evidence that the Bible is the Word of God, but many
Christians refuse to acknowledge that fact.
>*********************************************************************
>
> rather than explain his proof of how life came from non-living
>elements, and as i've posted in times past, the Evolutionists hope to
>quell the agony in his mind by switching the burden of proof...
Evolution is a fact that was discovered and understood over time by
scientists. You object to that discovery, but have no scientific
evidence to back up your objection.
> the Evolutionist can't give evidence there is no God ( because his
>own conscience betrays him, Ro. 1:18-20 ) so his next hope is to get a
>believer in Christ ( as though the Evolutionist could Biblically
>define such ) to help him out by putting to the believer a test.
Repeat references to religious doctrines does not make them true.
> this is the typical Evolutionists ploy... rather than explain his
>position scientifically of how life began out of elements not alive...
>even that his body is made up entirely of elements not alive, yet he
>is alive ( life came from God, not Darwin ) he'd rather sit back and
>test the believer; thinking if the believer can't satisfy the
>question to the Evolutionist, ( and the Evolutionist will never accept
>ANY answer whereas God wins the argument ) behold, the Evolutionist
>thinks himself the winner !
I think you don't understand what life is.
> an open and shut case where the Evolutionist always wins because he
>hates God so much no answer will satisfy him.
I don't hate God. God, as far as anyone can tell, is an imaginary being
invented by mankind. No evidence supports any special claims about any
gods.
>**********************************************************************
>
> no where does the Book, which is never picked up by an Evolutionist
>and read, even if he could understand it... which he can't ( 1 Cor.
>2:14 ) mention bugs being meat and all animals and creatures before
>the fall, as vegetarians.
I've read the entire Bible. You make a mockery of it with your dishonest
attempt to use it to support your war on knowledge. Read the Parable of
the Talents and repent of your ways.
> now, will the Evolutionist kindly explain how life came from
>non-living elements out of absolute sterility ? ? ?
>
> i didn't think so.
It doesn't matter how life began. Eventually, we will find a number of
possible pathways, but we aren't likely to ever be sure since life has
completely polluted the environment of pre-biotic Earth. If it makes you
feel good to claim that God gave life a start, that is your choice, but
it doesn't give you any reason to object to evolution, since evolution
is about how life changes over time and that fact has been demonstrated
an no religious zealot has offered any valid objections to it.
