On 2008-09-13 17:08:58 +0100, "Jamffer"
hotmail.com> said:
>
> "Free Lunch"
wrote in message
> news:lijnc4tn1qtgtj83hut6jsla891dgu4csr@4ax.com...>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:26:10 -0400, in alt.talk.creationism
>> old man joe
home.com> wrote in
>> 4ax.com>:>>> On Tue, 29 May 2007 16:02:16 -0400, "Ghamph"
localnet.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> Still searching for anyone in the entire world who has real hard
> evidence
>>>> that a supreme being exists.
>>>> If someone can present real hard evidence there will be more than one
>>>> Billion dollars available. They will also become very famous throughout
> the
>>>> world.
>>>> I am confident that no evidence will be found for a very good reason.
>>>> There is no supreme being.
>>>> Jamffer
>>>>
>>>
>>> Creation is hard evidence and you suppress that fact since it is
>>> made evident to you by God Himself. Ro. 1:18-20
>>>
>>> now pay up.
>>
>> You know that the Bible is made up. You know that no gods had anything
>> to do with it. When you are asked to provide evidence, you know that the
>> Bible doesn't count. Stop being such a fool.
>
> There is no creation, that I know of. The fact that everything exists, is
> evidence of itself, but not of any supreme being. If the only evidence you
> have is an ancient manuscript, written by cave dwellers and goat breeders,
> the reward will never be paid.
But therein lies the difficulty. One person says that the existence of
the universe is evidence of the existence of God, another says that it
is not. It is impossible to determine who is right without an agreed
definition of what God is and how his existence would be manifest in
the observable world.
