>On Tue, 29 May 2007 16:02:16 -0400, "Ghamph" localnet.com>
>wrote:
>

>>Still searching for anyone in the entire world who has real hard evidence
>>that a supreme being exists.
>>If someone can present real hard evidence there will be more than one
>>Billion dollars available. They will also become very famous throughout the
>>world.
>>I am confident that no evidence will be found for a very good reason.
>>There is no supreme being.
>>Jamffer
>>

>
> Creation is hard evidence and you suppress that fact since it is
>made evident to you by God Himself. Ro. 1:18-20
>
> now pay up. ...

> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:26:10 -0400, in alt.talk.creationism
> old man joe home.com> wrote in
> 4ax.com>:

>>On Tue, 29 May 2007 16:02:16 -0400, "Ghamph" localnet.com>
>>wrote:
>>

>>>Still searching for anyone in the entire world who has real hard

>>>that a supreme being exists.
>>>If someone can present real hard evidence there will be more than one
>>>Billion dollars available. They will also become very famous throughout

>>>world.
>>>I am confident that no evidence will be found for a very good reason.
>>>There is no supreme being.
>>>Jamffer
>>>

>> ...

>
> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
> news:lijnc4tn1qtgtj83hut6jsla891dgu4csr@4ax.com...

>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:26:10 -0400, in alt.talk.creationism
>> old man joe home.com...

> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:29:16 -0500, in alt.talk.creationism
> "adman" wrote in
> bignews7.bellsouth.net>:

>> Free Lunch wrote:

> ...

>>> You know I did not lie. You have no evidence, but refuse to be
>>> honest here.

>>
>> Sure you lie. Wanna know the qualifier in your statement for that
>> assertion? You said " ignorant of history and science ". The two do
>> not belong in the same sentence.
>>
>> History is subjective and based upon the author's, as well as the
>> readers, interputation of the events.

>
> When a book makes a claim that is objectively false, it is wrong.
> Subjectivity comes in the understanding of the impact of something
> that happened. You don't get to claim that it doesn't matter that the
> story is objectively false. ...