>In article 4ax.com>,
>Free Lunch wrote:
>...

>>>The people named in the first paragraph above are in their fifties and
>>>sixties, so they can't be considered "new" in the chronological sense.

>>
>>Newly energized in their response to the evils of religion.

>
>Yes.
>
>Incidentally (this is not directed at you, but at the OP), Sam Harris
>(the only one of those mentioned whose life and work I have studied in
>any detail) was born in 1967.
>
>I don't _think_ the others are that much older than that.