> On Nov 30, 10:11 am, Christopher A.Lee optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:08:48 -0800 (PST), pjmutn...@sbcglobal.net
>> wrote:

>

>>>On Nov 30, 7:17 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" wrote:

>

>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:09:09 -0800, pjmutnick wrote:

>>>>> Actually, God is our highest ideal of Truth, Beauty,
>>>>> and Goodness, according to which we attempt to interpret reality.

>

>>>> Well, that was entirely free of content...

>

>>>For you, it would be. For most of us, it is not. Actually it takes
>>>alot of effort to be a sophisticated fool, devoid of deep inner truth ...

> On Nov 30, 7:44 am, Uncle Vic withheld.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> One fine day in alt.atheism, pjmutn...@sbcglobal.net bloodied us up with
>> this:

>

>>> On Nov 30, 4:59 am, Michael Gray newsguy.com> wrote:

>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:01:59 GMT, Uncle Vic withheld.com>
>>>> wrote:

>

>>>>>One fine day in alt.atheism, "AKA gray asphalt"
>>>>>hotmail.spam.com> bloodied us up with this:

>

>>>>>"God" is an emotion, nothing more.

>

>>>> And an extremely infantile one, at that. ...

>
>"Christopher A.Lee" optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:u0h0l3tcdo1kebpre9bg62egl8gcbk6c28@4ax.com...

>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:45:49 -0500, "thinker"
>> notreal.com> wrote:...

>
>"Christopher A.Lee" optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:u0h0l3tcdo1kebpre9bg62egl8gcbk6c28@4ax.com...

>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:45:49 -0500, "thinker"
>> notreal.com> wrote:...

> Absolute bullshit on evry single account.
> It is not worth my time to address your outrageous lack of grasp of
> facts.

>
>"Michael Gray" newsguy.com> wrote in message
>news:pu81l3ta5on3rkgdqgmtrlm6f4ra6ro8tn@4ax.com...

>>>The difference between the believer and the non-believer amounts to a
>>>disagreement on whether the proposition "God exists" is true. Nothing
>>>more,
>>>nothing less.

>>
>> Not at all.
>> A baby is a disbeliever, yet cannot make the distinction that you
>> insist is required.
>> You are (subtly) quite wrong in your false dichotomy.

> "thinker" notreal.com> wrote:

>> "Daniel T." earthlink.net> wrote:

>>> "thinker" notreal.com> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Is the proposition, "God exists" true or false?

>>>
>>> It is meaningless.

>>
>> Do you believe there is an old man that sits in the clouds and rules
>> everything?

>
> Do you? Does anybody believe a human can sit in the clouds? Does anyone
> believe that a single person, no matter how old, rules everything?
>
> Your being silly.

> thinker wrote:

>> "Michael Gray" newsguy.com> wrote in message
>> news:pu81l3ta5on3rkgdqgmtrlm6f4ra6ro8tn@4ax.com...

>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:39:23 -0500, "thinker"
>>> notreal.com> wrote:
>>>

>>>> "Michael Gray" newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ns51l3linlft0fagpe4romgrd2omdor3do@4ax.com...

>>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:07:36 -0500, "thinker"
>>>>> notreal.com> wrote:
>>>>>

>>>>>> "Christopher A.Lee" optonline.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:u0h0l3tcdo1kebpre9bg62egl8gcbk6c28@4ax.com...

>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:45:49 -0500, "thinker"
>>>>>>> notreal.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "AKA gray asphalt" hotmail.spam.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:EWL3j.10394$Rw3.6226@newsfe06.phx... ...

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:42:18 -0500, "thinker"
> notreal.com> wrote:
>

>>
>>"Michael Gray" newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>news:pu81l3ta5on3rkgdqgmtrlm6f4ra6ro8tn@4ax.com...

>
> :
>

>>>>The difference between the believer and the non-believer amounts to a
>>>>disagreement on whether the proposition "God exists" is true. Nothing
>>>>more,
>>>>nothing less.

>>>
>>> Not at all.
>>> A baby is a disbeliever, yet cannot make the distinction that you
>>> insist is required.
>>> You are (subtly) quite wrong in your false dichotomy. ...