| Re: Science Disproves Evolution |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.atheism.satire · Group Profile
Author: ErrolErrol Date: May 19, 2008 07:23
> Similar problems are now widely acknowledged. If a big bang >occurred it happened 13.7 b.y. ago. If stars evolved, some stars are 16 >b.y. old, such as the stars in the globular cluster called M13 (2).
> Obviously, stars cannot be older than the universe.
So science is all fucked up then? They are forever disgraced and
should hang up their academic robes and slink off into the sunset.
(4.5 b.y old)
But God could be the explanation for this eery business.
God has a different perspective of time than we mere mortals (See
section titled "the mysterious ways of God")
> Also, the Hubble
> Space Telescope has found distant galaxies whose age, based on big
> bang assumptions, exceeds the age of the universe (3).
Oops forgot those there from a previous cycle of the universe
| 
