|
|
Up |
  |
Author: BHouseMadrigalsBHouseMadrigals Date: Sep 8, 2007 05:32
There are several distinct possibilities:
(1) Legitimately involved with their own families getting the kids off to
school, etc., etc.
(2) Watching reruns of The Dick Van Dyke Show produced in the good ole
days of the early 1960s before Kennedy was assassinated and all hell broke
loose politically in the US. (Those were the days.)
(3) Attending the latest Warren Commissionoid Convention... "We have met
the enemy and the enemy is us."
(4) On their annual Company paid vacation secretly funded by the FBI or
CIA... voting on who gets the coveted Edwin Landsdale award for political
subversion beyond the call of duty whether foreign or domestic.
(3) Attending the latest Ad Hominem Seminar looking for the lowest
personal attacks possible in leu of anything truly credible that Lee
Harvey Oswald shot anyone other than Santa Claus or Peter Pan in Dallas.
(4) Scouring the world looking for another bullet somehow, somewhere that
looks anything like CE399... but so far running out of gas money...
(5) Licking their wounds because their arguments continue to be repeatedly
rejected by 80 percent of American citizens who understand the
implications of this case better than they do.
|
| Show full article (1.74Kb) |
| 8 Comments |
|
  |
Author: clarkwilkinsclarkwilkins Date: Sep 8, 2007 17:08
On Sep 7, 8:32 pm, BHouseMadrig...@ aol.com wrote:
> There are several distinct possibilities:
>
> (1) Legitimately involved with their own families getting the kids off to
> school, etc., etc.
>
> (2) Watching reruns of The Dick Van Dyke Show produced in the good ole
> days of the early 1960s before Kennedy was assassinated and all hell broke
> loose politically in the US. (Those were the days.)
>
> (3) Attending the latest Warren Commissionoid Convention... "We have met
> the enemy and the enemy is us."
>
> (4) On their annual Company paid vacation secretly funded by the FBI or
> CIA... voting on who gets the coveted Edwin Landsdale award for political
> subversion beyond the call of duty whether foreign or domestic.
>
> (3) Attending the latest Ad Hominem Seminar looking for the lowest
> personal attacks possible in leu of anything truly credible that Lee
> Harvey Oswald shot anyone other than Santa Claus or Peter Pan in Dallas. ...
|
| Show full article (2.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: rwalkerrwalker Date: Sep 9, 2007 18:20
> On Sep 7, 8:32 pm, BHouseMadrig...@ aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> There are several distinct possibilities:
>
>> (1) Legitimately involved with their own families getting the kids off to
>> school, etc., etc.
>
>> (2) Watching reruns of The Dick Van Dyke Show produced in the good ole
>> days of the early 1960s before Kennedy was assassinated and all hell broke
>> loose politically in the US. (Those were the days.)
>
>> (3) Attending the latest Warren Commissionoid Convention... "We have met
>> the enemy and the enemy is us."
>
>> (4) On their annual Company paid vacation secretly funded by the FBI or ...
|
| Show full article (2.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman Date: Sep 9, 2007 18:30
> On Sep 7, 8:32 pm, BHouseMadrig...@ aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> There are several distinct possibilities:
>
>> (1) Legitimately involved with their own families getting the kids off to
>> school, etc., etc.
>
>> (2) Watching reruns of The Dick Van Dyke Show produced in the good ole
>> days of the early 1960s before Kennedy was assassinated and all hell broke
>> loose politically in the US. (Those were the days.)
>
>> (3) Attending the latest Warren Commissionoid Convention... "We have met
>> the enemy and the enemy is us."
>
>> (4) On their annual Company paid vacation secretly funded by the FBI or ...
|
| Show full article (3.14Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh Date: Sep 10, 2007 02:55
cdddraftsman wrote:
>> On Sep 7, 8:32 pm, BHouseMadrig...@ aol.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> There are several distinct possibilities:
>>> (1) Legitimately involved with their own families getting the kids off to
>>> school, etc., etc.
>>> (2) Watching reruns of The Dick Van Dyke Show produced in the good ole
>>> days of the early 1960s before Kennedy was assassinated and all hell broke
>>> loose politically in the US. (Those were the days.)
>>> (3) Attending the latest Warren Commissionoid Convention... "We have met
>>> the enemy and the enemy is us."
>>> (4) On their annual Company paid vacation secretly funded by the FBI or
>>> CIA... voting on who gets the coveted Edwin Landsdale award for political
>>> subversion beyond the call of duty whether foreign or domestic.
>>> (3) Attending the latest Ad Hominem Seminar looking for the lowest ...
|
| Show full article (4.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Russ BurrRuss Burr Date: Sep 10, 2007 03:05
> There are several distinct possibilities:
>
> (1) Legitimately involved with their own families getting the kids off to
> school, etc., etc.
>
> (2) Watching reruns of The Dick Van Dyke Show produced in the good ole
> days of the early 1960s before Kennedy was assassinated and all hell broke
> loose politically in the US. (Those were the days.)
>
> (3) Attending the latest Warren Commissionoid Convention... "We have met
> the enemy and the enemy is us."
>
> (4) On their annual Company paid vacation secretly funded by the FBI or
> CIA... voting on who gets the coveted Edwin Landsdale award for political
> subversion beyond the call of duty whether foreign or domestic.
>
> (3) Attending the latest Ad Hominem Seminar looking for the lowest
> personal attacks possible in leu of anything truly credible that Lee
> Harvey Oswald shot anyone other than Santa Claus or Peter Pan in Dallas. ...
|
| Show full article (1.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein Date: Sep 10, 2007 04:28
>>> "Not fair! I believe that David Von Pien [sic] has eliminated time
traveling space aliens as suspects. As near as I can tell, he's working
on eliminating a plot by Antarctic penguins with republican nomination
ambitions as his next debunking. Who knows? Maybe he'll attack a
conspiracy by tree moss next. If so, I think that will eliminate any CT
theories for me." <<<
Anybody have the slightest inkling what the above Clark rambling is
supposed to mean?
~shrug~
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman Date: Sep 11, 2007 04:53
On Sep 9, 7:28 pm, David Von Pein aol.com> wrote:
>>>> "Not fair! I believe that David Von Pien [sic] has eliminated time
>
> traveling space aliens as suspects. As near as I can tell, he's working
> on eliminating a plot by Antarctic penguins with republican nomination
> ambitions as his next debunking. Who knows? Maybe he'll attack a
> conspiracy by tree moss next. If so, I think that will eliminate any CT
> theories for me." <<<
>
> Anybody have the slightest inkling what the above Clark rambling is
> supposed to mean?
>
> ~shrug~
He's gone a bit top heavy on use wouldn't you say ? ............tl
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman Date: Sep 11, 2007 04:54
On Sep 9, 5:55 pm, Anthony Marsh comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>> The thing I don't understand is why any conspiracy's at all . I'm
>
> The plural of conspiracy is conspiracies, not conspiracy's. You used the
> possessive instead of the plural. The reason why there are conspiracies is
> because we are humans. There are conspiracies all the time and the
> government is always prosecuting conspiracies.
>
>
>>> 99%% against the public sector of society and not against supposed
>>> imaginary machinations that your all hung up about .
>
>> perfectly happy at a lone nut solution . Every assassination in the
>> past that got close or was successful had at best one person
>> involved .
>
> That is pure nonsense. The US government hanged 4 people for conspiracy in
> the Lincoln assassination. About half of all assassinations involve more ...
|
| Show full article (2.75Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|