|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: burb2872burb2872 Date: Jul 22, 2008 03:37
IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate AND he claims to
have seen SOMEONE in the SOUTHWEST corner WINDOW on 6TH at 12:15>>>could
that not be LHO HIMSELF?
And, if yes, doesn't that narrow the window re: his whereabouts vis-a- vis
Givens and other testimonies?
Thx bunchly!
Burb
|
| |
| 90 Comments |
|
|
Author: curtjester1curtjester1 Date: Jul 23, 2008 05:36
On Jul 21, 6:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: > IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate AND he claims to
> have seen SOMEONE in the SOUTHWEST corner WINDOW on 6TH at 12:15>>>could
> that not be LHO HIMSELF?
>
> And, if yes, doesn't that narrow the window re: his whereabouts vis-a- vis
> Givens and other testimonies?
>
> Thx bunchly!
> Burb
Check out Howard Roffman's 'Presumed Guilty' online, chapter 8.
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BudBud Date: Jul 24, 2008 04:47
On Jul 22, 11:36 pm, curtjester1 hotmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 21, 6:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote:
> >> IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate AND he claims to
>> have seen SOMEONE in the SOUTHWEST corner WINDOW on 6TH at 12:15>>>could
>> that not be LHO HIMSELF?
>
>> And, if yes, doesn't that narrow the window re: his whereabouts vis-a- vis
>> Givens and other testimonies?
>
>> Thx bunchly!
>> Burb
>
> Check out Howard Roffman's 'Presumed Guilty' online, chapter 8.
>
> I do think it's possible to believe in LHO on the sixth floor if one
> consider's the two Oswald theory,
What a bargain, two employees for the price of one.
|
| Show full article (2.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: yeuhdyeuhd Date: Jul 24, 2008 05:53
On Jul 21, 8:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: > IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate
Right there is where the theory falls apart! Beyond his name and address,
I don't believe a word of Rowland's testimony. An elderly black man
looking out the sniper's window? Two black women in the windows below
that?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: burb2872burb2872 Date: Jul 24, 2008 06:05
On Jul 22, 9:36 pm, curtjester1 hotmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 21, 6:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote:
> >> IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate AND he claims to
>> have seen SOMEONE in the SOUTHWEST corner WINDOW on 6TH at 12:15>>>could
>> that not be LHO HIMSELF?
>
>> And, if yes, doesn't that narrow the window re: his whereabouts vis-a- vis
>> Givens and other testimonies?
>
>> Thx bunchly!
>> Burb
>
> Check out Howard Roffman's 'Presumed Guilty' online, chapter 8.
>
> I do think it's possible to believe in LHO on the sixth floor if one
> consider's the two Oswald theory, and having both in the TSBD at the same
> time. Most would scoff at that, but I do think it would be possible for
> Judyth Baker's scenario via the phone call she received before the
> assassination that LHO might be used to take one warning shot (the missed ...
|
| Show full article (4.59Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: curtjester1curtjester1 Date: Jul 24, 2008 16:38
On Jul 23, 7:47 pm, Bud fast.net> wrote:> On Jul 22, 11:36 pm, curtjester1 hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Jul 21, 6:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: >
>>> IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate AND he claims to
>>> have seen SOMEONE in the SOUTHWEST corner WINDOW on 6TH at 12:15>>>could
>>> that not be LHO HIMSELF?
>
>>> And, if yes, doesn't that narrow the window re: his whereabouts vis-a- vis
>>> Givens and other testimonies?
>
>>> Thx bunchly!
>>> Burb
>
>> Check out Howard Roffman's 'Presumed Guilty' online, chapter 8. ...
|
| Show full article (4.15Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: curtjester1curtjester1 Date: Jul 24, 2008 16:38
On Jul 23, 8:53 pm, yeuhd gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 21, 8:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote:
> >> IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate
>
> Right there is where the theory falls apart! Beyond his name and address,
> I don't believe a word of Rowland's testimony. An elderly black man
> looking out the sniper's window? Two black women in the windows below
> that?
Hard to eliminate the two people seen by others, especially when 40
inmates saw two men and watched a fooling around with a scope with
Rowland seeing a rifle with a scope attached. He also saw the clock
sign at 12:15 and heard the police radio givng the motorcade location
which would have been 12:15/12:16. It also matches the Dillard photo
of a man in the southwest window, with a light-colored or white shirt.
CJ
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: curtjester1curtjester1 Date: Jul 24, 2008 16:38
On Jul 23, 9:05 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: > On Jul 22, 9:36 pm, curtjester1 hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Jul 21, 6:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: >
>>> IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate AND he claims to
>>> have seen SOMEONE in the SOUTHWEST corner WINDOW on 6TH at 12:15>>>could
>>> that not be LHO HIMSELF?
>
>>> And, if yes, doesn't that narrow the window re: his whereabouts vis-a- vis
>>> Givens and other testimonies?
>
>>> Thx bunchly!
>>> Burb
>
>> Check out Howard Roffman's 'Presumed Guilty' online, chapter 8. ...
|
| Show full article (6.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: yeuhdyeuhd Date: Jul 24, 2008 23:43
On Jul 23, 11:05 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: > 5) Timeline - 12:30 (shooting)>12:31:30 (Baker sees LHO on 2nd)>>> Again,
> my Q re: timeline has NOT been properly excused away from ANYONE ON THIS
> SITE - IF I'm the homicide cop in charge, this is one of the major doubts
> I would have to face, HOW IN THE TIME THE SHOOTER HAD, COULD IT BE LHO
> THAT BAKER SEES 11/2 MINS AFTER SHOOTING???
Special Agent John Howlett of the Secret Service re-created Oswald's
actions from the 6th floor window, stopping to place a rifle where
Oswald's was hidden, and down to the 2nd floor lunch room in two time
trials, one walking at a fast walk (74 seconds) and one walking at a
normal pace (78 seconds). "Howlett was not short winded at the end of
either test run," the WC reported.
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0087a.htm
The HSCA was able to re-create Oswald's actions in even less time at a
running pace (46 seconds).
So — what is the problem?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh Date: Jul 25, 2008 00:00
curtjester1 wrote:
> On Jul 23, 9:05 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: >> On Jul 22, 9:36 pm, curtjester1 hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> On Jul 21, 6:37 pm, burb2...@ yahoo.com wrote: >>>> IF Arnold Rowland's WC testimony can be taken as accurate AND he claims to
>>>> have seen SOMEONE in the SOUTHWEST corner WINDOW on 6TH at 12:15>>>could
>>>> that not be LHO HIMSELF?
>>>> And, if yes, doesn't that narrow the window re: his whereabouts vis-a- vis
>>>> Givens and other testimonies?
>>>> Thx bunchly!
>>>> Burb
>>> Check out Howard Roffman's 'Presumed Guilty' online, chapter 8.
>>> I do think it's possible to believe in LHO on the sixth floor if one
>>> consider's the two Oswald theory, and having both in the TSBD at the same
>>> time. Most would scoff at that, but I do think it would be possible for ...
|
| Show full article (7.12Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
